57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An assessment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting direct costs in three EU countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been commonly reported as one of the most distressing adverse effects among treated patients with cancer. Inadequately treated, CINV can lead to increased resource utilization and severely impair patients’ daily functioning and quality of life.

          Direct costs include acquisition cost of antiemetic drugs and rescue medication, administration devices, add-on treatments, such as hydration, and additional patient care, that is, nursing and physician time, unscheduled office visits, emergency room admissions, and, in some cases, extended hospitalization or readmission. There are many reports on the cost-effectiveness of antiemetic drugs, but information on the total cost per patient associated with CINV is limited. The costs associated with severe CINV episodes are considered responsible for the most significant part of the expenditures.

          Scope:

          The aim of this study was to investigate the management of CINV episodes in three European health-care environments and to estimate direct costs associated with severe CINV episodes.

          Methods:

          An online survey addressed to Italian, German, and French oncologists and oncology nurses was performed. The survey included 41 questions about the management and the resource utilization for patients experiencing any CINV episode during the 6-month period preceding the survey. Furthermore, the cost associated with severe CINV episode management was estimated by adopting the National Health Service’s perspective.

          Findings:

          A large proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy experienced a CINV episode (34.4% in Italy, 50.2% in France, and 40.4% in Germany); among those, 8.8% in Italy, 11.6% in France, and 19.2% in Germany experienced a severe CINV episode. Compared with Italy, Germany and France presented a greater hospitalization rate following an unplanned visit to the oncology ward or an emergency room access due to CINV. In Italy, the mean cost per patient with a severe CINV episode resulted in approximately €389, about half of the mean cost in France (€750) and a third of the mean cost in Germany (€1,017).

          Conclusions:

          Severe CINV episodes requiring hospitalization, day hospital, or hospitalization extension involve a significant cost for the National Health Services; additional studies should be conducted in order to evaluate potential ways to offset these expenses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: incidence and impact on patient quality of life at community oncology settings.

          The present study sought to determine the prevalence of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) across ten community oncology settings. The effect of CINV on quality of life (QOL) was also evaluated. Cancer patients who were scheduled for their first cycle of a new chemotherapy regimen were recruited from ten community oncology clinics. Study participants recorded occurrence of CINV by completing a daily diary each day for the first 8 days after treatment during each cycle and the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) before chemotherapy, at the end of day 1 and day 6 after chemotherapy. Mixed model regression analysis was used to explore the association between occurrence of CINV at cycle 1 and subsequent cycles and its impact on patient QOL. One hundred and fifty-one patients provided information for at least one cycle. During cycle 1, only 33% had neither acute nor delayed CINV. Of the 36% patients who developed acute CINV, 8% developed acute CINV only. Of the 59% who developed delayed CINV, 53% reported delayed only and 47% reported acute and delayed CINV. A similar pattern was seen at cycles 2 and 3. Experience of CINV at cycle 1 was associated with the development of CINV at cycles 2 and 3. Occurrence of CINV significantly interfered with patient QOL as assessed by the FLIE. CINV remained a substantial problem for patients receiving chemotherapy in this community-based sample, especially delayed CINV. CINV significantly interfered with patient QOL and daily functioning.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics.

            The authors determined the incidence of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis (vomiting) (CINV) among patients receiving highly (HEC) or moderately (MEC) emetogenic chemotherapy. They also assessed whether physicians and nurses accurately recognized the incidence of acute and delayed CINV in their own practices. A prospective, observational study of adult patients receiving HEC or MEC for the first time was performed. Before patient enrollment, medical oncologists and oncology nurses estimated the incidence of acute (Day 1) and delayed (Days 2-5) CINV after first administration of HEC and MEC in their own practices. Eligible patients from their practices then completed a 6-day diary including emetic episodes, nausea assessment, and antiemetic medication use. Observed incidence rates of acute and delayed CINV were compared with physician/nurse predictions. Twenty-four physicians and nurses and 298 eligible patients (67 receiving HEC and 231 receiving MEC) were recruited from 14 oncology practices in 6 countries. Greater than 35% of patients overall experienced acute nausea, whereas 13% experienced acute emesis. Delayed nausea and emesis were observed in 60% and 50% of HEC patients, respectively, and in 52% and 28% of MEC patients, respectively. Delayed symptoms appeared without acute symptoms after HEC (emesis, 38%; nausea, 33%) and MEC (emesis, 19%; nausea, 21%). Physicians and nurses accurately predicted the incidence of acute CINV but underestimated the incidence of delayed nausea and emesis after HEC by 21 and 28 percentage points, respectively, and delayed nausea after MEC by 28 percentage points. Greater than 75% of physicians and nurses underestimated the incidence of delayed CINV after both HEC and MEC. Physicians and nurses markedly underestimated the incidence of delayed nausea and emesis after both HEC and MEC. Delayed nausea and emesis, which may appear even in the absence of acute nausea and emesis, remain important targets for improved therapeutic intervention. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy.

              To propose a classification of the acute emetogenicity of antineoplastic chemotherapy agents, and to develop an algorithm to define the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens. A Medline search was conducted to identify (1) clinical trials that used chemotherapy as single-agent therapy, and (2) major reviews of antiemetic therapy. The search was limited to patients who received commonly used doses of chemotherapy agents, primarily by short ( 90%). For combinations, the emetogenic level was determined by identifying the most emetogenic agent in the combination and then assessing the relative contribution of the other agents. The following rules apply: (1) level 1 agents do not contribute to the emetogenic level of a combination; (2) adding > or = one level 2 agent increases the emetogenicity of the combination by one level greater than the most emetogenic agent in the combination; and (3) adding level 3 or 4 agents increases the emetogenicity of the combination by one level per agent. The proposed classification schema provides a practical means to determine the emetogenic potential of individual chemotherapy agents and combination regimens during the 24 hours after administration. This system can serve as a framework for the development of antiemetic guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drugs Context
                Drugs Context
                DIC
                Drugs in Context
                Just Medical Media Limited
                1745-1981
                1740-4398
                2015
                28 July 2015
                : 4
                : 212285
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano/Pazzallo, Switzerland;
                [2 ]IMS Health Information Solutions Medical Research srl, Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Nazarena Cataldo, IMS Health Information Solutions Medical Research srl, Viale E. Jenner, 53 – 20159 Milano – Italy. ncataldo@ 123456it.imshealth.com

                Contributions: Claudio Ripellino and Nazarena Cataldo were responsible for survey design, data analyses, and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

                Potential conflicts of interests and funding: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests forms for the authors are available for download at: http://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/dic.212285-COI.pdf.

                This study was financially supported by an unrestricted grant from Helsinn Healthcare SA. Pierfrancesco Ruffo, Marco Turini, and Vittoria Piovesana are employees of Helsinn SA. Claudio Ripellino and Nazarena Cataldo are employees of IMS Health Information Solutions Medical Research srl and work for Novartis, Lundbeck, Bayer, Otsuka, Takeda, and Merck Serono. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflict of interest with regard to the content of this article.

                Correct attribution: Copyright © 2015 Turini M, Piovesana V, Ruffo P, Ripellino C, Cataldo N. http://dx.doi.org/10.7573/dic.212285. Published by Drugs in Context under Creative Commons License Deed CC BY NC ND 3.0.

                Provenance: Submitted; externally peer reviewed

                Peer review comments to author: 9 July 2015;

                Drugs in Context is published by Just Medical Media Ltd. Registered office: Undermount, Rydal, Ambleside, Cumbria, LA22 9LT, UK

                Just Medical Media Limited is registered in England Number 6891187. VAT GB 945 1713 22

                For all manuscript and submissions enquiries, contact Julia Savory, Head of Digital Publishing and Submissions Management julia@ 123456justmedicalmedia.com

                For all permissions, rights, and reprints, contact Stephen I’Anson, Commercial Director steve@ 123456justmedicalmedia.com

                Article
                dic-4-212285
                10.7573/dic.212285
                4544273
                26322114
                35760b9f-612c-4e9e-9635-e0e74f28fe35
                Copyright © 2015 Marco T, Vittoria P, Pierfrancesco R, Claudio R, Nazarena C.

                Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License Deed CC BY NC ND 3.0 which allows anyone to copy, distribute, and transmit the article provided it is properly attributed in the manner specified below. No commercial use without permission.

                History
                : 30 June 2015
                Categories
                Original Research

                cinv,chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting,antiemetic,resource utilization,direct cost,italy,france,germany,cinv management

                Comments

                Comment on this article