68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present a method for categorising and comparing alien or invasive species in terms of how damaging they are to the environment, that can be applied across all taxa, scales, and impact metrics.

          Abstract

          Species moved by human activities beyond the limits of their native geographic ranges into areas in which they do not naturally occur (termed aliens) can cause a broad range of significant changes to recipient ecosystems; however, their impacts vary greatly across species and the ecosystems into which they are introduced. There is therefore a critical need for a standardised method to evaluate, compare, and eventually predict the magnitudes of these different impacts. Here, we propose a straightforward system for classifying alien species according to the magnitude of their environmental impacts, based on the mechanisms of impact used to code species in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Global Invasive Species Database, which are presented here for the first time. The classification system uses five semi-quantitative scenarios describing impacts under each mechanism to assign species to different levels of impact—ranging from Minimal to Massive—with assignment corresponding to the highest level of deleterious impact associated with any of the mechanisms. The scheme also includes categories for species that are Not Evaluated, have No Alien Population, or are Data Deficient, and a method for assigning uncertainty to all the classifications. We show how this classification system is applicable at different levels of ecological complexity and different spatial and temporal scales, and embraces existing impact metrics. In fact, the scheme is analogous to the already widely adopted and accepted Red List approach to categorising extinction risk, and so could conceivably be readily integrated with existing practices and policies in many regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline.

          Different components of global environmental change are often studied and managed independently, but mounting evidence points towards complex non-additive interaction effects between drivers of native species decline. Using the example of interactions between land-use change and biotic exchange, we develop an interpretive framework that will enable global change researchers to identify and discriminate between major interaction pathways. We formalise a distinction between numerically mediated versus functionally moderated causal pathways. Despite superficial similarity of their effects, numerical and functional pathways stem from fundamentally different mechanisms of action and have fundamentally different consequences for conservation management. Our framework is a first step toward building a better quantitative understanding of how interactions between drivers might mitigate or exacerbate the net effects of global environmental change on biotic communities in the future.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions

            A major challenge of invasion biology is the development of a predictive framework that prevents new invasions. This is inherently difficult because different biological characteristics are important at the different stages of invasion: opportunity/transport, establishment and spread. Here, we draw from recent research on a variety of taxa to examine the evolutionary causes and consequences of biological invasions. The process of introduction may favour species with characteristics that promote success in highly disturbed, human-dominated landscapes, thus exerting novel forms of selection on introduced populations. Moreover, evidence is accumulating that multiple introductions can often be critical to the successful establishment and spread of introduced species, as they may be important sources of genetic variation necessary for adaptation in new environments or may permit the introduction of novel traits. Thus, not only should the introduction of new species be prevented, but substantial effort should also be directed to preventing the secondary introduction of previously established species (and even movement of individuals among introduced populations). Modern molecular techniques can take advantage of genetic changes postintroduction to determine the source of introduced populations and their vectors of spread, and to elucidate the mechanisms of success of some invasive species. Moreover, the growing availability of genomic tools will permit the identification of underlying genetic causes of invasive success.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of an invasive plant changes over time.

              Many exotic plant invaders pose a serious threat to native communities, but little is known about the dynamics of their impacts over time. In this study, we explored the impact of an invasive plant Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) at 24 grassland sites invaded for different periods of time (from 11 to 48 years). Native species' richness and productivity were initially reduced by hogweed invasion but tended to recover after ~30 years of hogweed residence at the sites. Hogweed cover declined over the whole period assessed. A complementary common garden experiment suggested that the dynamics observed in the field were due to a negative plant-soil feedback; hogweed survival and biomass, and its competitive ability were lower when growing in soil inocula collected from earlier-invaded grasslands. Our results provide evidence that the initial dominance of an invasive plant species and its negative impact can later be reversed by stabilising processes. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                May 2014
                6 May 2014
                : 12
                : 5
                : e1001850
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [3 ]Environment Institute, School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [5 ]Imperial College London, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom
                [6 ]The Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [7 ]Technische Universität München, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Restoration Ecology, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
                [8 ]UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, Halle, Germany
                [9 ]German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [10 ]Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
                [11 ]Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic
                [12 ]Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
                [13 ]Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                [14 ]Environment Agency Austria, Department of Biodiversity and Nature Conservation, Vienna, Austria
                [15 ]Redpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [16 ]Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
                [17 ]South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens, Claremont, South Africa
                [18 ]ISPRA, Institute for Environmental Protection and Research and Chair IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, Rome, Italy
                [19 ]Department of Biology, Unit Ecology & Evolution, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Article
                PBIOLOGY-D-13-04781
                10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850
                4011680
                24802715
                35dd5a60-adb4-4376-89c7-bfd06f8aff7c
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                The sDiv workshop that led to the sImpact working group was funded by the German Research Foundation DFG (FZT 118). JP, PP, and ZM acknowledge the support from long-term research development project no. RVO 67985939 (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic), Centre of Excellence PLADIAS no. 14-36079G, and grant no. P504/11/1028 (Czech Science Foundation), and institutional resources of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic. PP acknowledges the support by the Praemium Academiae award from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. JMJ acknowledges support from the ERA-Net BiodivERsA (project FFII), with the national funder German Research Foundation DFG (JE 288/7-1). SK acknowledges financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, and the Drakenstein Trust. DMR and JRUW acknowledge support from the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology and the National Research Foundation (grants 85417 and 86894, respectively). AS acknowledges financial support of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). MV acknowledges support from the Severo Ochoa Program for Centres of Excellence in R+D+I (SEV-2012-0262). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Essay
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecological Metrics
                Global Change Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Bioindicators
                Conservation Science

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article