5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Burden of Keloid Disease: A Cross-sectional Health-related Quality of Life Assessment.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Keloid scars may be painful, itch severely and be cosmetically disturbing. The burden of keloid disease, however, has not yet been determined. This study evaluated the association of keloid disease with health-related quality of life (HRQL) and identified indicators of burden using a cross-sectional survey study, with one disease-specific HRQL measure (Skindex-29) and 2 generic HRQL measures (SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L). A total of 106 keloid patients with no other skin diseases participated in the study. Having keloid disease was associated with a considerable impairment of emotional wellbeing, with most impairment on the emotional and mental HRQL. Pain and itch were the strongest indicators of HRQL impairment in keloid patients. Having painful or itchy keloids was related to low mental and emotional HRQL, implying that patients with keloids require access to effective treatment aimed at alleviating physical symptoms.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Acta Derm. Venereol.
          Acta dermato-venereologica
          Acta Dermato-Venereologica
          1651-2057
          0001-5555
          Feb 08 2017
          : 97
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.bijlard@erasmusmc.nl.
          Article
          10.2340/00015555-2498
          27378582
          377393f8-9c4d-42a7-8a26-fbdfd7df4622
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article