Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sap-Sucking Pests; They Do Matter

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense.

          There has been a long-standing hypothesis that specialist and generalist insects interact with plants in distinct ways. Although many tests exist, they typically compare only one species of each, they sometimes confound specialization and feeding guild, and often do not link chemical or transcriptional measures of the plant to actual resistance. In this review, we synthesize current data on whether specialists and generalists actually differ, with special attention to comparisons of their differential elicitation of plant responses. Although we find few consistencies in plant induction by specialists versus generalists, feeding guilds are predictive of differential plant responses. We outline a novel set of predictions based on current coevolutionary hypotheses and make methodological suggestions for improved comparisons of specialists and generalists. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emerging virus diseases transmitted by whiteflies.

            Virus diseases that have emerged in the past two decades limit the production of important vegetable crops in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions worldwide, and many of the causal viruses are transmitted by whiteflies (order Hemiptera, family Aleyrodidae). Most of these whitefly-transmitted viruses are begomoviruses (family Geminiviridae), although whiteflies are also vectors of criniviruses, ipomoviruses, torradoviruses, and some carlaviruses. Factors driving the emergence and establishment of whitefly-transmitted diseases include genetic changes in the virus through mutation and recombination, changes in the vector populations coupled with polyphagy of the main vector, Bemisia tabaci, and long distance traffic of plant material or vector insects due to trade of vegetables and ornamental plants. The role of humans in increasing the emergence of virus diseases is obvious, and the effect that climate change may have in the future is unclear. Copyright © 2011 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transmission of plant viruses by aphid vectors.

              SUMMARY Aphids are the most common vector of plant viruses. Mechanisms of transmission are best understood by considering the routes of virus movement in the aphid (circulative versus non-circulative) and the sites of retention or target tissues (e.g. stylets, salivary glands). Capsid proteins are a primary, but not necessarily sole, viral determinant of transmission. A summary is presented of the taxonomic affiliations of the aphid transmitted viruses, including 8 families, 18 genera, and taxonomically unassigned viruses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Insects
                Insects
                insects
                Insects
                MDPI
                2075-4450
                19 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 12
                : 4
                : 363
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan
                [2 ]Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Chiyoda, Tokyo 102-0083, Japan
                [3 ]Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos str, Athens 11855, Attica, Greece
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-5141
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-1289
                Article
                insects-12-00363
                10.3390/insects12040363
                8072765
                384ee682-631c-4861-b7f7-6b1afe36a197
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 08 April 2021
                : 16 April 2021
                Categories
                Editorial

                integrated pest management (ipm),management of sap-sucking pests,natural enemies,plant–insect interaction,plant–microbe–insect interactions,plant defense mechanisms,sap-sucking pest biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article