17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Project ESTEEM protocol: a randomized controlled trial of an LGBTQ-affirmative treatment for young adult sexual minority men’s mental and sexual health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Young gay and bisexual men disproportionately experience depression, anxiety, and substance use problems and are among the highest risk group for HIV infection in the U.S. Diverse methods locate the source of these health disparities in young gay and bisexual men’s exposure to minority stress. In fact, minority stress, psychiatric morbidity, substance use, and HIV risk fuel each other, forming a synergistic threat to young gay and bisexual men’s health. Yet no known intervention addresses minority stress to improve mental health, substance use problems, or their joint impact on HIV risk in this population. This paper describes the design of a study to test the efficacy of such an intervention, called ESTEEM (Effective Skills to Empower Effective Men), a 10-session skills-building intervention designed to reduce young gay and bisexual men’s co-occurring health risks by addressing the underlying cognitive, affective, and behavioral pathways through which minority stress impairs health.

          Methods

          This study, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, is a three-arm randomized controlled trial to examine (1) the efficacy of ESTEEM compared to community mental health treatment and HIV counseling and testing and (2) whether ESTEEM works through its hypothesized cognitive, affective, and behavioral minority stress processes. Our primary outcome, measured 8 months after baseline, is condomless anal sex in the absence of PrEP or known undetectable viral load of HIV+ primary partners. Secondary outcomes include depression, anxiety, substance use, sexual compulsivity, and PrEP uptake, also measured 8 months after baseline.

          Discussion

          Delivering specific stand-alone treatments for specific mental, behavioral, and sexual health problems represents the current state of evidence-based practice. However, dissemination and implementation of this one treatment-one problem approach has not been ideal. A single intervention that reduces young gay and bisexual men’s depression, anxiety, substance use, and HIV risk by reducing the common minority stress pathways across these problems would represent an efficient, cost-effective alternative to currently isolated approaches, and holds great promise for reducing sexual orientation health disparities among young men.

          Trial registration

          Registered October 10, 2016 to ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02929069.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in white and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults.

            We examined specific family rejecting reactions to sexual orientation and gender expression during adolescence as predictors of current health problems in a sample of lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. On the basis of previously collected in-depth interviews, we developed quantitative scales to assess retrospectively in young adults the frequency of parental and caregiver reactions to a lesbian, gay, or bisexual sexual orientation during adolescence. Our survey instrument also included measures of 9 negative health indicators, including mental health, substance abuse, and sexual risk. The survey was administered to a sample of 224 white and Latino self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults, aged 21 to 25, recruited through diverse venues and organizations. Participants completed self-report questionnaires by using either computer-assisted or pencil-and-paper surveys. Higher rates of family rejection were significantly associated with poorer health outcomes. On the basis of odds ratios, lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults who reported higher levels of family rejection during adolescence were 8.4 times more likely to report having attempted suicide, 5.9 times more likely to report high levels of depression, 3.4 times more likely to use illegal drugs, and 3.4 times more likely to report having engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse compared with peers from families that reported no or low levels of family rejection. Latino men reported the highest number of negative family reactions to their sexual orientation in adolescence. This study establishes a clear link between specific parental and caregiver rejecting behaviors and negative health problems in young lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Providers who serve this population should assess and help educate families about the impact of rejecting behaviors. Counseling families, providing anticipatory guidance, and referring families for counseling and support can help make a critical difference in helping decrease risk and increasing well-being for lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: a cognitive-affective-behavioral model.

              Many assume that individuals with a hidden stigma escape the difficulties faced by individuals with a visible stigma. However, recent research has shown that individuals with a concealable stigma also face considerable stressors and psychological challenges. The ambiguity of social situations combined with the threat of potential discovery makes possessing a concealable stigma a difficult predicament for many individuals. The increasing amount of research on concealable stigmas necessitates a cohesive model for integrating relevant findings. This article offers a cognitive-affective-behavioral process model for understanding the psychological implications of concealing a stigma. It ends with discussion of potential points of intervention in the model as well as potential future routes for investigation of the model.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                john.pachankis@yale.edu
                erin.mcconocha@yale.edu
                jesse.reynolds@yale.edu
                rw2738@cumc.columbia.edu
                oluwaseyi.adeyinka@nyulangone.org
                aharkness@miami.edu
                charles.burton@yale.edu
                kriti.behari@yale.edu
                TJ.Sullivan@stonybrook.edu
                aie2108@cumc.columbia.edu
                denise.esserman@yale.edu
                mlh2101@cumc.columbia.edu
                ssafren@miami.edu
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                9 August 2019
                9 August 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 1086
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000419368710, GRID grid.47100.32, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, , Yale School of Public Health, ; New Haven, USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000419368710, GRID grid.47100.32, Department of Biostatistics, , Yale School of Public Health, ; New Haven, USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8606, GRID grid.26790.3a, Department of Public Health Sciences, , University of Miami, ; Miami, USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000419368729, GRID grid.21729.3f, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, , Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, ; New York City, USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8606, GRID grid.26790.3a, Department of Psychology, , University of Miami, ; Miami, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2015-9225
                Article
                7346
                10.1186/s12889-019-7346-4
                6688287
                31399071
                3bcbe73c-21a8-43cb-80f9-a08d832b74ae
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 28 June 2019
                : 19 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health (US)
                Award ID: R01 MH 109413
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article