11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dykes or diapirs?

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT:

          Until the last few years, diapirism reigned supreme among granitoid ascent mechanisms. Granitoid masses in a variety of material states, from pure melt through semi-molten crystal mushes to solid rock, were believed to have risen forcefully through the continental crust to their final emplacement levels in a way analogous to salt domes. The structural analogy between granite plutons and salt diapirs, which gained acceptance in the 1930s, has clearly been attractive despite the pessimistic outcomes of thermal models and, at best, ambiguous field evidence.

          In contrast with traditional diapiric ascent, dyke transport of granitoid magmas has a number of important implications for the emplacement and geochemistry of granites that have yet to be fully explored. Rapid ascent rates of ≍ 10 2m/s predicted for granite melts in dykes (cf. m/a for diapirs) mean that felsic magmas can be transported through the continental crust in months rather than thousands (or even millions) of years, and that large plutons can in principle be filled in <10 4 a. Granitic melts are likely to rise adiabatically from their source regions, leading to the resorption of any entrained restitic material. Ascending melts in dykes close to their critical minimum widths may have little opportunity to assimilate significant amounts of country rock, and if source extraction is sufficiently rapid, most crustal contamination will be restricted to the site of emplacement. Rates of pluton and batholith inflation will be determined by the amount and rate of melt extraction at source.

          The construction of large plutons and batholiths piecemeal from a number of magma pulses separated by periods of relative quiescence provides a means of reconciling rapid ascent rates with times for batholith construction based on average rates. Field and seismic evidence that shows batholiths as large, sheet-like structures with flat roofs and floors is consistent with a general model for plutons and batholiths as laccolith-type structures, fed from depth by dykes. The overall geometry of this type of structure helps ameliorate the space problem, which developed as a consequence of the unrealistic volumes of upwelling granite associated with the classical diapir model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The operated Markov´s chains in economy (discrete chains of Markov with the income)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Viscosities of magmatic silicate liquids; an empirical method of prediction

            H. R. Shaw (1972)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Generation of Granitic Magmas by Intrusion of Basalt into Continental Crust

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
                Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1755-6910
                1755-6929
                1996
                November 03 2011
                1996
                : 87
                : 1-2
                : 105-114
                Article
                10.1017/S0263593300006520
                3d9540f8-7d42-4bbc-8dba-1be57ce6e804
                © 1996

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article