10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab Alone for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck : The Phase 2 CheckMate 714 Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial investigates whether first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone improves objective response rate in adult patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

          Key Points

          Question

          Does first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab provide clinical benefit vs nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN)?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial of 425 adults with platinum-refractory or platinum-eligible R/M SCCHN, the primary end point of objective response rate benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab was not met; results were generally similar in the population with platinum-eligible disease. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile.

          Meaning

          In this trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab had no clinical benefit over nivolumab alone as first-line treatment for R/M SCCHN.

          Abstract

          Importance

          There remains an unmet need to improve clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

          Objective

          To evaluate clinical benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in patients with R/M SCCHN.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          The CheckMate 714, double-blind, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 83 sites in 21 countries between October 20, 2016, and January 23, 2019. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had platinum-refractory or platinum-eligible R/M SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for R/M disease. Data were analyzed from October 20, 2016 (first patient, first visit), to March 8, 2019 (primary database lock), and April 6, 2020 (overall survival database lock).

          Interventions

          Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks) or nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) plus placebo for up to 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or consent withdrawal.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response between treatment arms by blinded independent central review in the population with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Exploratory end points included safety.

          Results

          Of 425 included patients, 241 (56.7%; median age, 59 [range, 24-82] years; 194 males [80.5%]) had platinum-refractory disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 159; nivolumab, n = 82) and 184 (43.3%; median age, 62 [range, 33-88] years; 152 males [82.6%]) had platinum-eligible disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 123; nivolumab, n = 61). At primary database lock, the ORR in the population with platinum-refractory disease was 13.2% (95% CI, 8.4%-19.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 18.3% (95% CI, 10.6%-28.4%) with nivolumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95.5% CI, 0.33-1.43; P = .29). Median duration of response for nivolumab plus ipilimumab was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 11.0 months to NR) vs 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.1 months to NR) for nivolumab. In the population with platinum-eligible disease, the ORR was 20.3% (95% CI, 13.6%-28.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 29.5% (95% CI, 18.5%-42.6%) with nivolumab. The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab were 15.8% (25 of 158) vs 14.6% (12 of 82) in the population with platinum-refractory disease and 24.6% (30 of 122) vs 13.1% (8 of 61) in the population with platinum-eligible disease.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The CheckMate 714 randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point of ORR benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with an acceptable safety profile. Research to identify patient subpopulations in R/M SCCHN that would benefit from nivolumab plus ipilimumab over nivolumab monotherapy is warranted.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02823574

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

          This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

            (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

              Among the most promising approaches to activating therapeutic antitumour immunity is the blockade of immune checkpoints. Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumours co-opt certain immune-checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Because many of the immune checkpoints are initiated by ligand-receptor interactions, they can be readily blocked by antibodies or modulated by recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies were the first of this class of immunotherapeutics to achieve US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Preliminary clinical findings with blockers of additional immune-checkpoint proteins, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), indicate broad and diverse opportunities to enhance antitumour immunity with the potential to produce durable clinical responses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                6 April 2023
                June 2023
                6 April 2023
                : 9
                : 6
                : 779-789
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [3 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
                [4 ]National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
                [5 ]Hygeia Hospital, Marousi, Greece
                [6 ]Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [7 ]Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
                [8 ]Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
                [9 ]Centrul de Oncologie Sf Nectarie, Craiova, Romania
                [10 ]Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
                [11 ]University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [12 ]Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
                [13 ]Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
                [14 ]Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
                [15 ]University of Louisville, Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, Kentucky
                [16 ]Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d’Amiens, Amiens, France
                [17 ]Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
                [18 ]St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
                [19 ]Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
                [20 ]Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
                [21 ]Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [22 ]Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
                [23 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: December 10, 2022.
                Published Online: April 6, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0147
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2023 Harrington KJ et al. JAMA Oncology.
                Corresponding Author: Kevin J. Harrington, MBBS, PhD, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JB, United Kingdom ( kevin.harrington@ 123456icr.ac.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Harrington had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Harrington, Ferris, Gillison, Argiris, Wei, Haddad.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Harrington, Ferris, Tahara, Argiris, Fayette, Schenker, Bratland, Walker, Grell, Even, Chung, Redman, Coutte, Salas, Grant, de Azevedo, Soulières, Hansen, Wei, Khan, Miller-Moslin, Roberts, Haddad.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Harrington, Ferris, Tahara, Argiris, Schenker, Bratland, Walker, Grell, Wei, Khan, Miller-Moslin, Roberts.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Bratland, Walker, Wei, Khan.
                Obtained funding: Ferris.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Harrington, Ferris, Walker, Chung, Soulières, Khan, Miller-Moslin, Roberts, Haddad.
                Supervision: Harrington, Ferris, Tahara, Schenker, Chung, Redman, de Azevedo, Soulières, Hansen, Khan, Haddad.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Harrington reported receiving personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Arch Oncology, Codiak, Inzen, Merck Serono, MSD, Replimune, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer; receiving honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, and MSD; receiving meeting attendance and/or travel support from Merck Serono, MSD, and Replimune; participating in data safety monitoring board or advisory board meetings for Arch Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Codiak, Inzen, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer, and Replimune; and receiving grants from AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Replimune, and MSD. Dr Ferris reported receiving personal fees from Achilles Therapeutics, Adagene Inc, Aduro Biotech, Bicara Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics LLC, Catenion, Coherus BioSciences, EMD Serono, Everest Clinical Research Corporation, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Genocea Biosciences, Hookipa Biotech, Instil Bio, Kowa Research Institute, Lifescience Dynamics Limited, MacroGenics, MeiraGTx LLC, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Nanobiotix, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Novasenta, Numab Therapeutics, Oncocyte Corporation, Pfizer, PPD Development, Rakuten Medical, Sanofi, Seagen, SIRPant Immunotherapeutics, Vir Biotechnology, and Zymeworks; receiving grants from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novasenta, and Tesaro; serving on the advisory board of Coherus BioSciences, Hookipa, Instil Bio, Lifescience Dynamics, MacroGenics, MeiraGTx LLC, Oncocyte Corporation, Pfizer, Rakuten Medical, Seagen, SIRPant Immunotherapeutics, and Vir Biotechnology; serving on the data safety monitoring board for and having stock in Mirror Biologics; having stock in or receiving stock options from Novasenta; serving on the advisory board for and receiving research funding from Numab Therapeutics; and serving as president-elect of the American Head and Neck Society. Prof Gillison reported receiving clinical trial support to the institution from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and from Gilead Sciences, Seagen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Kura Oncology, and Agenus outside the submitted work; receiving personal fees from EMD Serono, Shattuck Labs, BioNTech, Kura Oncology, LLX Solutions, Eisai Medical Research, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Nektar Therapeutics, Debiopharm, Coherus BioSciences, Mirati Therapeutics, Sensei Biotherapeutics, Seagen, Istari Oncology, iTeos Therapeutics, Caladrius Biosciences, Exelixis, Amgen, Aspyrian Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bicara Therapeutics, Celgene, Genocea Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NewLink Genetics, OncLive Intellisphere, Roche, and TRM Oncology; receiving honoraria from OncLive and Roche; having patents issued for plasmid DNA and patents pending for oral human papillomavirus infection detection and screening; participating on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for BioMimetix, Kura Oncology, NRG, Seagen, Sensei Biotherapeutics, and SQZ Biotech; receiving options from Sensei Biotherapeutics; and receiving research funding to the institution from Agenus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cullinan Labs, Genentech, Genocea Biosciences, Kura Oncology, LaRoche, NRG, and the University of Cincinnati. Dr Tahara reported receiving personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and grants from Ono Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study; receiving personal fees from Bayer, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Rakuten Medical, Genmab, Nektar, Janssen, Astellas, Eisai, and MSD outside the submitted work; receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Merck, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Rakuten Medical; and receiving grants or contracts to the institution from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Rakuten Medical. Dr Argiris reported receiving research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and speaker fees from Merck. Dr Fayette reported receiving personal fees and nonfinancial support from MSD and AstraZeneca; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Bristol Myers Squibb; and personal fees from Innate Pharma, Roche, Hookipa, Merck, F-star, and Sanofi. Dr Schenker reported receiving grants from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and grants or fees from Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, GSK, Amgen, Astellas, AbbVie, Bioven, BeiGene, Bayer, Clovis, Gilead, Mylan, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Samsung Pharmaceuticals, and Tesaro outside the submitted work. Dr Bratland reported receiving grants from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and from Merck Sharp & Dohme and GSK outside the submitted work; receiving personal fees from Sanofi for serving on the advisory board; and serving as president of the Scandinavian Society for Head and Neck Oncology. Dr Grell reported receiving funding from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Roche and Servier outside the submitted work. Dr Even reported receiving personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Merck Serono; travel fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD; nonfinancial support from MSD and Merck Serono; and participating in data safety monitoring board or advisory board meetings for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, F-Star Therapeutics, and MSD. Dr Chung reported receiving a clinical trial contract from Bristol Myers Squibb to the Moffitt Cancer Center during the conduct of the study and personal fees for participating on ad hoc scientific advisory boards from Merck, Sanofi, Exelixis, Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Fulgent, GenMap, and Aveo outside the submitted work. Dr Redman reported receiving institutional funding from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and from Merck, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Iovance, Molecular Templates, RAPT Therapeutics, Inspirna, and ALX Oncology outside the submitted work. Dr Grant reported receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr de Azevedo reported participating in data safety monitoring board or advisory board meetings for Gilead Brazil. Dr Soulières reported receiving grants to the institution and personal fees for advisory board or clinical study board participation from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and from Merck and Adlai-Nortye outside the submitted work. Dr Hansen reported receiving research support to the institution from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Eisai, Novartis, POINT Biopharma, GSK, and MedImmune outside the submitted work and receiving consulting fees from Eisai, GSK, and Merck. Dr Wei reported receiving stocks from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Khan reported having stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Miller-Moslin reported having stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Roberts reported being employed by Takeda outside the submitted work. Dr Haddad reported receiving grants from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study; receiving personal fees for consulting or advisory board participation from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, EMD, Eisai, Celgene, Kura, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Exelixis, Blue DOT, and Nanobiotix outside the submitted work; having a leadership role in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network; receiving consulting fees from Achilles Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Coherus BioSciences, Eisai, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Immunomic Therapeutics, Loxo, Merck, Mirati, Pfizer, and Vaccinex; receiving royalties or having patents or other intellectual property from UpToDate; receiving research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Kura Oncology, Merck, and Pfizer; and receiving fees for serving as chair of the data safety monitoring board for 2 trials run by Nanobiotix and ISA Pharmaceuticals. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The study was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: In collaboration with the authors, Bristol Myers Squibb was involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Meeting Presentation: This study was presented in part at the European Society for Medical Oncology 41st Congress; October 9, 2016; Copenhagen, Denmark.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 3.
                Additional Contributions: We thank the patients, their families, and the clinical study teams for making this study possible. We also thank Dako for collaborative development of the PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Sonji Smith, BA (Bristol Myers Squibb), served as global trial manager for the CheckMate 714 study; she did not receive any compensation beyond her salary. Meenakshi Subramanian, PhD (Evidence Scientific Solutions), provided writing and editorial assistance; Cheryl Doyle, BA (Evidence Scientific Solutions, Inc), provided editorial support; and Courtney Laney, BA (Evidence Scientific Solutions, Inc) provided administrative support; all were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.
                Article
                coi230005
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0147
                10080406
                37022706
                3d98f687-3d5d-4ffa-9aac-e2a99d880b54
                Copyright 2023 Harrington KJ et al. JAMA Oncology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 2 September 2022
                : 10 December 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content316

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors1,512