23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The publication of a large number of taxon names at all levels within the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) has resulted in conflicting systematic schemes and generated considerable confusion among biologists working with these important plant symbionts. A group of biologists with more than a century of collective experience in the systematics of Glomeromycota examined all available molecular-phylogenetic evidence within the framework of phylogenetic hypotheses, incorporating morphological characters when they were congruent. This study is the outcome, wherein the classification of Glomeromycota is revised by rejecting some new names on the grounds that they are founded in error and by synonymizing others that, while validly published, are not evidence-based. The proposed "consensus" will provide a framework for additional original research aimed at clarifying the evolutionary history of this important group of symbiotic fungi.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Mycorrhiza
          Mycorrhiza
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1432-1890
          0940-6360
          Oct 2013
          : 23
          : 7
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Université de Bourgogne/INRA, UMR 1347 Agroécologie, 17 rue Sully, BP 86510, 21000, Dijon, France, dirk.redecker@dijon.inra.fr.
          Article
          10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y
          23558516
          3f1ae65b-c319-4280-a251-4ef1eb369335
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article