1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self-reported work ability predicts health-related exit and absence from work, work participation, and death: longitudinal findings from a sample of German employees

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The cohort study examined the performance of the Work Ability Index in predicting health-related exit and absence from work, work participation, and death among a sample of workers previously receiving sickness absence benefits.

          Methods

          Workers aged 40–54 years who received sickness absence benefits in 2012 completed the Work Ability Index in 2013. Outcomes were extracted from administrative data records covering the period until the end of 2016.

          Results

          Data for 2266 participants were included (mean age: 47.9 years; 54.4% women). Maximum follow-up was 43 months. In terms of work ability, 38.4% had good scores, 38.2% moderate scores, and 23.4% poor scores. Fully adjusted analyses showed an increased risk of a disability pension in workers with poor (HR = 12.98; 95% CI 5.81–28.99) and moderate Work Ability Index scores (HR = 3.17; 95% CI 1.36–7.38) compared to workers with good or excellent scores. The risk of a rehabilitation measure was also significantly increased for workers with poor and moderate scores. In addition, poor scores were prospectively associated with a longer duration of sickness absence and unemployment benefits, and fewer employment days and less income from regular employment. Those with poor Work Ability Index scores also had a significantly increased risk of premature death.

          Conclusions

          The Work Ability Index is a potential tool to identify individuals with previous long-term sickness absence having an increased risk of health-related exit and absence from work and poor work participation outcomes.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00420-020-01608-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

          Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers.This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Work Ability Index (WAI)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                matthias.bethge@uksh.de
                Journal
                Int Arch Occup Environ Health
                Int Arch Occup Environ Health
                International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-0131
                1432-1246
                21 November 2020
                21 November 2020
                2021
                : 94
                : 4
                : 591-599
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4562.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0057 2672, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, , University of Lübeck, ; Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.6363.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, , Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, ; Berlin, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-7812
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-4930
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8299-2415
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1808-9210
                Article
                1608
                10.1007/s00420-020-01608-4
                8068707
                33219840
                4006cad1-27c0-44d9-af1a-01a9b869a915
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 May 2020
                : 3 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (DE)
                Award ID: 8011-106-31/31.104.1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Universität zu Lübeck (3165)
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Occupational & Environmental medicine
                needs assessment,occupational health,rehabilitation,pensions,cohort study

                Comments

                Comment on this article