3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The effect of immunization against gonadotropin-releasing factor in market gilts: Meta-analyses of parameters relevant for pig producers, pork packers and retailers/consumers.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The vaccine against gonadotropin releasing factor (GnRF), Improvac®, has recently emerged as an option for rearing market gilts up to heavier harvest weights. Improvac's® temporary suppression of the ovarian function and gonadal hormones results in greater feed intake and better welfare from avoidance of sexual behavioral problems. Based on 22 published articles, our meta-analysis has quantified the effect of immunizing gilts against GnRF on parameters relevant for pig producers, pork packers and retailers/consumers. The meta-analyses included growth performance and final harvest parameters, general carcass traits and yield of valuable meat, meat and fat quality parameters. Primary analyses considered studies without ractopamine, subgroup and additional analyses assessed the impact of co-variates. From the perspective of pig producers, primary analyses showed that immunized (IM) gilts have significantly (P < 0.001) increased average daily gain (+45.1 g/day) and daily feed intake (+0.19 kg/day), higher final live weight (+4.0 kg) and more backfat (+2.8 mm). From the perspective of the pork packers, IM gilts have heavier carcasses (+3.2 kg; P < 0.001), whereas dressing percentage is similar. IM gilts are less lean (-1.5% units; P < 0.001) and have 0.21% units more intramuscular fat (P = 0.001). The yield of ham, shoulder, and loin is similar, whereas the yield of belly is significantly higher (+0.28 kg; P < 0.001). There are no differences in meat quality parameters (color, pH24, and drip loss) between IM gilts and untreated gilts, whereas a lower iodine value in IM gilts indicates an improved fat quality. Further subgroup and additional analyses confirmed the validity of our meta-analysis.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Res Vet Sci
          Research in veterinary science
          Elsevier BV
          1532-2661
          0034-5288
          Aug 2020
          : 131
          Affiliations
          [1 ] EAH-Consulting, Karlsgraben 12, 52064 Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: bpn@eah-consulting.de.
          [2 ] CHESS, Zwarte Leeuwstraat 69, 2820 Bonheiden, Belgium.
          [3 ] Zoetis, 10 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ 07054, USA.
          Article
          S0034-5288(20)30226-5
          10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.04.012
          32387811
          41136207-7d8e-43e7-89ec-b16b6d05c08b
          Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
          History

          Carcass traits,Female pigs,Immunization against GnRF,Meat characteristics,Meta-analysis,Performance

          Comments

          Comment on this article