A Working Group Classification of Focal Prostate Atrophy Lesions

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Focal atrophy is extremely common in prostate specimens. Although there are distinct histologic variants, the terminology is currently nonstandardized and no formal classification has been tested for interobserver reliability. This lack of standardization hampers the ability to study the biologic and clinical significance of these lesions. After informal and formal meetings by a number of the authors, focal atrophy lesions were categorized into 4 distinct subtypes as follows: (i) simple atrophy, (ii) simple atrophy with cyst formation, (iii) postatrophic hyperplasia, and (iv) partial atrophy. In phase 1 of the study, pathologists with varying levels of experience in prostate pathology were invited to view via the Internet a set of "training" images with associated descriptions of lesions considered typical of each subtype. In phase 2 of the study, each participant provided diagnoses on a series of 140 distinct "test" images that were viewed over the Internet. These test images consisted of the 4 subtypes of atrophy and images of normal epithelium, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and carcinoma. The diagnoses for each image from each pathologist were compared with a set of "standard" diagnoses and the kappa statistic was computed. Thirty-four pathologists completed both phases of the study. The interobserver reliability (median kappa) for classification of lesions as normal, cancer, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or focal atrophy was 0.97. The median kappa for the classification of atrophy lesions into the 4 subtypes was 0.80. The median percent agreement with the standard diagnosis for the atrophy subtypes were: simple 60.6%, simple with cyst formation 100%; postatrophic hyperplasia 87.5%; partial atrophy 93.9%. The lower percentage for simple atrophy reflected a propensity to diagnose some of these as simple atrophy with cyst formation. Seven pathologists completed the phase 2 analysis a second time, and their intraobserver reproducibility was excellent. Three of 4 pathologists with low agreement with the standard diagnosis for simple atrophy improved their scores after repeating the analysis after re-examination of the "training set" of images. In conclusion, these criteria for variants of focal prostate atrophy may facilitate studies to examine the relation between various patterns of prostate atrophy and prostate cancer.

Related collections

Most cited references 6

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate: implications for prostatic carcinogenesis.

Angelo De Marzo, Valerie L. Marchi, Jonathan Epstein … (1999)

Proliferation in the setting of longstanding chronic inflammation appears to predispose to carcinoma in the liver, large bowel, urinary bladder, and gastric mucosa. Focal prostatic atrophy, which is associated with chronic inflammation, is highly proliferative (Ruska et al, Am J Surg Pathol 1998, 22:1073-1077); thus the focus of this study was to more fully characterize the phenotype of the atrophic cells to assess the feasibility of the proposal that they may be targets of neoplastic transformation. The pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1), a carcinogen-detoxifying enzyme, is not expressed in >90% of prostate carcinomas (CaPs). GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation, which appears to permanently silence transcription, is the most frequently detected genomic alteration in CaP (Lee et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:11733-11737; >90% of cases). In high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), this alteration is present in at least 70% of cases (Brooks et al, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 1998, 7:531-536). Although normal-appearing prostate secretory cells rarely express GSTP1, they remain capable of expression, inasmuch as GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation is not detected in normal prostate. Fifty-five lesions from paraffin-embedded prostatectomy specimens (n = 42) were stained for GSTP1, using immunohistochemistry. Adjacent sections were stained for p27(Kip1), Ki-67, androgen receptor (AR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP), Bcl-2, and basal cell-specific cytokeratins (34betaE12). With normal prostate epithelium as the internal standard, staining was scored for each marker in the atrophic epithelium. The lesions showed two cell types, basal cells staining positive for 34betaE12, and atrophic secretory-type cells staining weakly negative for 34betaE12. All lesions showed elevated levels of Bcl-2 in many of the secretory-type cells. All lesions had an elevated staining index for the proliferation marker Ki-67 in the secretory layer and decreased expression of p27(Kip1), a finding reminiscent of high-grade PIN (De Marzo et al, Am J Pathol 1998, 153:911-919). Consistent with partial secretory cell differentiation, the luminal cells showed weak to moderate staining for androgen receptor and the secretory proteins PSA and PSAP. All atrophic lesions showed elevated GSTP1 expression in many of the luminal secretory-type cells. Because all lesions are hyperproliferative, are associated with inflammation, and have the distinct morphological appearance recognized as prostatic atrophy, we suggest the term "proliferative inflammatory atrophy" (PIA). Elevated levels of GSTP1 may reflect its inducible nature in secretory cells, possibly in response to increased electrophile or oxidant stress. Elevated Bcl-2 expression may be responsible for the very low apoptotic rate in PIA and is consistent with the conclusion that PIA is a regenerative lesion. We discuss our proposal to integrate the atrophy and high-grade PIN hypotheses of prostate carcinogenesis by suggesting that atrophy may give rise to carcinoma either directly, as previously postulated, or indirectly by first developing into high-grade PIN.

0 comments Cited 142 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Intermediate cells in human prostate epithelium are enriched in proliferative inflammatory atrophy.

Geert van Leenders, Wesley Gage, Jessica Hicks … (2003)

Within the human prostate epithelium four cell populations can be discriminated based on their expression of keratins (K). Basal cells express high levels of K5 and K14, as well as p63, whereas they have very low levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), K8, and K18. Luminal secretory cells lack p63, K5, and K14 but express high levels of K8, K18, androgen receptor, and PSA. Additionally, cells have been identified with a keratin phenotype intermediate between basal and luminal cells that co-express high levels of K5 and K18 (K5/18) as well as hepatocyte growth factor receptor c-MET. Although intermediate cells have been proposed as precursor cells of prostate cancer, their biology is ill defined. Epithelial cells in proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) appear to be cycling rapidly as indicated by expression of Ki-67, and morphological transitions have been identified between PIA and high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia. Many of the atrophic epithelial luminal cells in PIA are candidates for intermediate cells based in part on weak expression of PSA and androgen receptor, high levels of K8/18, and lack of p63. The objective of this study was to further clarify the phenotype of the proposed intermediate cells in PIA and to quantitatively determine the level in which these intermediate cells preferentially occur in PIA lesions. Intermediate cells were immunohistochemically demonstrated using antibodies to K5, K14, K18, and c-MET. Using radical prostatectomy specimens (n = 15) the area fraction of intermediate cells in normally differentiated prostate epithelium and PIA were quantified by a grid point counting method. Atrophic luminal cells of PIA lesions expressed K5 in 39.2 +/- 7.4% of cells compared to 2.4 +/- 2.3% in normal epithelium (P < 0.00001). By contrast, K14 was only expressed in 3.0 +/- 3.2% of the luminal cells. Previous studies have shown that virtually 100% of these atrophic luminal cells are strongly positive for K8/18. c-MET was present in 44.1 +/- 14.1% of luminal cells in PIA but only in 2.1 +/- 2.8% of luminal cells in normal epithelium (P < 0.00001). To unambiguously determine whether intermediate luminal cells in PIA show increased proliferative activity and decreased p27(kip1) expression, double-staining immunofluorescence of Ki-67 and K5, as well as p27(Kip1) and K5 was performed. Luminal cells in PIA often co-expressed K5 and Ki-67. Although p27(Kip1) was strongly expressed in K5-negative differentiated cells in normal epithelium, p27(Kip1) staining was absent in many of the K5-positive cells in the luminal compartment of PIA. We conclude that cells phenotypically intermediate between basal and secretory cells are enriched in PIA lesions. The finding of a large number of highly proliferating intermediate cells in PIA provides further support that these cells may serve as preferred target cells in prostate carcinogenesis.