5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Yellow and Blue Sticky Cards for Detection and Monitoring Parasitoid Wasps of the Invasive Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The invasive Halyomorpha halys (Stål) is a significant agricultural and urban nuisance pest in many parts of the world. In North America, biological control of H. halys by parasitoid wasps in the families Scelionidae and Eupelmidae has shown promise. An effective technique for detection and monitoring native and exotic parasitoids is the deployment of yellow sticky cards; however, yellow cards also attract nontarget arthropods, reducing efficiency and accuracy of parasitoid screening. This study sought to identify an alternative yet effective trapping technique by comparing the number of target parasitoid wasps [Anastatus spp. Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), Telenomus spp. Haliday (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), and Trissolcus spp. Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)] and arthropod bycatch on yellow and blue sticky cards deployed in urban, orchard, and vegetable landscapes in northern Utah from late May to early October in 2019 and 2020. Yellow sticky cards captured 54–72% more target parasitoids than blue cards from June through August in all three landscape types in both years; however, a positive correlation in parasitoid capture indicated blue cards detect target parasitoids, just in fewer numbers. Both card colors detected adventive Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) in initial findings of 2019, and in expanded locations of 2020. Furthermore, blue cards captured 31–48% less Diptera and nontarget Hymenoptera than yellow cards in both years across all three landscapes, translating to reduced card processing time and impacts to beneficial insect populations. Our results suggest that blue vs yellow sticky cards offer an alternative monitoring technique to survey for H. halys parasitoids.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

          Maximum likelihood or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates of the parameters in linear mixed-effects models can be determined using the lmer function in the lme4 package for R. As for most model-fitting functions in R, the model is described in an lmer call by a formula, in this case including both fixed- and random-effects terms. The formula and data together determine a numerical representation of the model from which the profiled deviance or the profiled REML criterion can be evaluated as a function of some of the model parameters. The appropriate criterion is optimized, using one of the constrained optimization functions in R, to provide the parameter estimates. We describe the structure of the model, the steps in evaluating the profiled deviance or REML criterion, and the structure of classes or types that represents such a model. Sufficient detail is included to allow specialization of these structures by users who wish to write functions to fit specialized linear mixed models, such as models incorporating pedigrees or smoothing splines, that are not easily expressible in the formula language used by lmer. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1) ISSN:1548-7660
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

            The extent of our reliance on animal pollination for world crop production for human food has not previously been evaluated and the previous estimates for countries or continents have seldom used primary data. In this review, we expand the previous estimates using novel primary data from 200 countries and found that fruit, vegetable or seed production from 87 of the leading global food crops is dependent upon animal pollination, while 28 crops do not rely upon animal pollination. However, global production volumes give a contrasting perspective, since 60% of global production comes from crops that do not depend on animal pollination, 35% from crops that depend on pollinators, and 5% are unevaluated. Using all crops traded on the world market and setting aside crops that are solely passively self-pollinated, wind-pollinated or parthenocarpic, we then evaluated the level of dependence on animal-mediated pollination for crops that are directly consumed by humans. We found that pollinators are essential for 13 crops, production is highly pollinator dependent for 30, moderately for 27, slightly for 21, unimportant for 7, and is of unknown significance for the remaining 9. We further evaluated whether local and landscape-wide management for natural pollination services could help to sustain crop diversity and production. Case studies for nine crops on four continents revealed that agricultural intensification jeopardizes wild bee communities and their stabilizing effect on pollination services at the landscape scale.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being

              Wild and managed pollinators provide a wide range of benefits to society in terms of contributions to food security, farmer and beekeeper livelihoods, social and cultural values, as well as the maintenance of wider biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Pollinators face numerous threats, including changes in land-use and management intensity, climate change, pesticides and genetically modified crops, pollinator management and pathogens, and invasive alien species. There are well-documented declines in some wild and managed pollinators in several regions of the world. However, many effective policy and management responses can be implemented to safeguard pollinators and sustain pollination services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Subject Editor
                Journal
                J Insect Sci
                J Insect Sci
                jis
                Journal of Insect Science
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1536-2442
                September 2021
                02 September 2021
                02 September 2021
                : 21
                : 5
                : 1
                Affiliations
                Biology Department, Utah State University , 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author, e-mail: cody.holthouse@ 123456usu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9919-1542
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-0405
                Article
                ieab062
                10.1093/jisesa/ieab062
                8411605
                34473296
                46b56dcc-856f-4875-8647-53fefef44d39
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 June 2021
                : 03 August 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Food and Agriculture, DOI 10.13039/100005825;
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture, DOI 10.13039/100000199;
                Award ID: 2016-51181-25409
                Funded by: Utah Department of Agriculture and Food;
                Funded by: Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education, DOI 10.13039/100006104;
                Award ID: 2017-38640-26913
                Award ID: GW18-106
                Funded by: USDA APHIS PPQ;
                Award ID: AP18PPQFO000C099
                Award ID: AP19PPQFO000C343
                Funded by: Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, DOI 10.13039/100007199;
                Funded by: Utah State University, DOI 10.13039/100006630;
                Award ID: 9488
                Categories
                Research Article
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01382

                Entomology
                anastatus spp,bycatch,parasitoid,survey,telenomus spp,trissolcus spp
                Entomology
                anastatus spp, bycatch, parasitoid, survey, telenomus spp, trissolcus spp

                Comments

                Comment on this article