9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Social Support and Optimism as Protective Factors for Mental Health among 7765 Healthcare Workers in Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of the VOICE Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is impacting mental health worldwide, particularly among healthcare workers (HCWs). Risk and protective factors for depression and generalized anxiety in healthcare workers need to be identified to protect their health and ability to work. Social support and optimism are known protective psychosocial resources, but have not been adequately studied in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers in Germany. Methods: Within the first wave of the VOICE study ( n = 7765), a longitudinal web-based survey study among healthcare workers in Germany, we assessed symptoms of depression (PHQ-2) and generalized anxiety (GAD-2), social support (ENRICHD Social Support Inventory; ESSI), and generalized optimism as well as sociodemographic, occupational, and COVID-19 related variables. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the constructs. Results: The analyses revealed that higher levels of social support and optimism were associated with lower levels of depression and generalized anxiety. They showed a higher association with depression and generalized anxiety than demographic or occupational risk factors such as female gender and direct contact with infected individuals. Conclusion: Psychosocial resources such as social support and optimism appear to contribute to successful coping with the COVID-19 pandemic and should be considered in future studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Highlights • At least one in five healthcare professionals report symptoms of depression and anxiety. • Almost four in 10 healthcare workers experience sleeping difficulties and/or insomnia. • Rates of anxiety and depression were higher for female healthcare workers and nursing staff. • Milder mood symptoms are common and screening should aim to identify mild and sub-threshold syndromes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.

              Actual and perceived social isolation are both associated with increased risk for early mortality. In this meta-analytic review, our objective is to establish the overall and relative magnitude of social isolation and loneliness and to examine possible moderators. We conducted a literature search of studies (January 1980 to February 2014) using MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar. The included studies provided quantitative data on mortality as affected by loneliness, social isolation, or living alone. Across studies in which several possible confounds were statistically controlled for, the weighted average effect sizes were as follows: social isolation odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, loneliness OR = 1.26, and living alone OR = 1.32, corresponding to an average of 29%, 26%, and 32% increased likelihood of mortality, respectively. We found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region, but initial health status has an influence on the findings. Results also differ across participant age, with social deficits being more predictive of death in samples with an average age younger than 65 years. Overall, the influence of both objective and subjective social isolation on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                06 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 18
                : 7
                : 3827
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; eva.morawa@ 123456uk-erlangen.de (E.M.); andrea.borho@ 123456uk-erlangen.de (A.B.); marietta.lieb@ 123456uk-erlangen.de (M.L.); yesim.erim@ 123456uk-erlangen.de (Y.E.)
                [2 ]Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Clinic of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; franziska.geiser@ 123456ukbonn.de (F.G.); nina.hiebel@ 123456ukbonn.de (N.H.)
                [3 ]Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; petra.beschoner@ 123456uniklinik-ulm.de (P.B.); lucia.bretzke@ 123456uni-ulm.de (L.J.-B.)
                [4 ]Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, 50931 Cologne, Germany; christian.albus@ 123456uk-koeln.de
                [5 ]Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; kerstin.weidner@ 123456uniklinikum-dresden.de (K.W.); susann.schmiedgen@ 123456tu-dresden.de (S.S.-S.)
                Author notes
                [†]

                The present work was performed in fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. rer. biol. hum”.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-9692
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-5290
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-7133
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-6158
                Article
                ijerph-18-03827
                10.3390/ijerph18073827
                8038794
                33917493
                46ceb80b-40c4-4c81-aba5-832ea4965108
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 January 2021
                : 30 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                covid-19,anxiety,depression,healthcare,mental health,resources,social support,optimism
                Public health
                covid-19, anxiety, depression, healthcare, mental health, resources, social support, optimism

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content223

                Cited by30

                Most referenced authors1,455