33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Long‐Term Opioid Therapy in Older Cancer Survivors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To examine the rates and predictors of long-term opioid therapy in older cancer survivors Retrospective cohort study. Texas, United States. Cancer survivors (≥ 5 years post-cancer diagnosis) diagnosed from 1995 to 2008 and who were also Medicare Part A, B, and D beneficiaries. We used Medicare Part D event data to calculate the proportion of cancer survivors with a prolonged opioid prescription (≥90-day supply of opioids/year). Adjusted odds ratios were calculated to identify predictors of prolonged opioid prescribing. All analyses were repeated with a sub-cohort of opioid naïve cancer survivors. The rate of prolonged opioid therapy for cancer patients diagnosed in 2008 was 7.1% prior to cancer diagnosis; it rose to 9.8% within a year of cancer treatments, and to 13.3% at five years post-diagnosis. The rate at the sixth year varied by cancer sites: 19.4% in lung cancer and 9.6% in prostate cancer. Among opioid naïve survivors, the rate increased from 1.4% to 7.1%, from five to eighteen years post-cancer diagnosis. Cancer survivors diagnosed in 2004–2008 had higher rates of opioid prescribing compared to those diagnosed in 1995–1998 and 1999–2003. Years since diagnosis, a later year of diagnosis, female gender, urban location, lung cancer diagnosis, disability as reason for Medicare entitlement, Medicaid eligibility, ≥1 comorbidity, and history of depression, drug abuse were predictors of prolonged opioid therapy. Among opioid naïve cancer survivors, diagnosis in 2004–2008 was the strongest predictor, while a history of drug abuse was the strongest predictor for all the survivors. The rates of prolonged opioid prescribing for older cancer survivors remained high at ≥ 5 years after cancer diagnosis. Our findings have potential to inform the development of clinical guidelines and public policy to ensure safer and more effective pain treatment in older cancer survivors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC.

          Here we provide the updated version of the guidelines of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) on the use of opioids for the treatment of cancer pain. The update was undertaken by the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. Previous EAPC guidelines were reviewed and compared with other currently available guidelines, and consensus recommendations were created by formal international expert panel. The content of the guidelines was defined according to several topics, each of which was assigned to collaborators who developed systematic literature reviews with a common methodology. The recommendations were developed by a writing committee that combined the evidence derived from the systematic reviews with the panellists' evaluations in a co-authored process, and were endorsed by the EAPC Board of Directors. The guidelines are presented as a list of 16 evidence-based recommendations developed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optimal pain management for patients with cancer in the modern era

            Pain is a common symptom amongst patients with cancer. Adequate pain assessment and management is critical to improve the quality of life and health outcomes in this population. In this review we provide a framework for safely and effectively managing cancer-related pain by summarizing the evidence for the importance of controlling pain, the barriers to adequate pain management, strategies to assess and manage cancer-related pain, how to manage pain in patients at risk of substance use disorder and considerations when managing pain in a survivorship population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              New Persistent Opioid Use Among Patients With Cancer After Curative-Intent Surgery

              Purpose The current epidemic of prescription opioid misuse has increased scrutiny of postoperative opioid prescribing. Some 6% to 8% of opioid-naïve patients undergoing noncancer procedures develop new persistent opioid use; however, it is unknown if a similar risk applies to patients with cancer. We sought to define the risk of new persistent opioid use after curative-intent surgery, identify risk factors, and describe changes in daily opioid dose over time after surgery. Methods Using a national data set of insurance claims, we identified patients with cancer undergoing curative-intent surgery from 2010 to 2014. We included melanoma, breast, colorectal, lung, esophageal, and hepato-pancreato-biliary/gastric cancer. Primary outcomes were new persistent opioid use (opioid-naïve patients who continued filling opioid prescriptions 90 to 180 days after surgery) and daily opioid dose (evaluated monthly during the year after surgery). Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for new persistent opioid use. Results A total of 68,463 eligible patients underwent curative-intent surgery and filled opioid prescriptions. Among opioid-naïve patients, the risk of new persistent opioid use was 10.4% (95% CI, 10.1% to 10.7%). One year after surgery, these patients continued filling prescriptions with daily doses similar to chronic opioid users ( P = .05), equivalent to six tablets per day of 5-mg hydrocodone. Those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had modestly higher doses ( P = .002), but patients with no chemotherapy still had doses equivalent to five tablets per day of 5-mg hydrocodone. Across different procedures, the covariate-adjusted risk of new persistent opioid use in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was 15% to 21%, compared with 7% to 11% for those with no chemotherapy. Conclusion New persistent opioid use is a common iatrogenic complication in patients with cancer undergoing curative-intent surgery. This problem requires changes to prescribing guidelines and patient counseling during the surveillance and survivorship phases of care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
                J Am Geriatr Soc
                Wiley
                0002-8614
                1532-5415
                April 29 2019
                May 2019
                April 26 2019
                May 2019
                : 67
                : 5
                : 945-952
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of MedicineUniversity of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas
                [2 ]Department of Preventive Medicine and Community HealthUniversity of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas
                [3 ]Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas
                [4 ]Sealy Center on AgingUniversity of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas
                [5 ]Institute for Translational SciencesUniversity of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas
                Article
                10.1111/jgs.15945
                6645777
                31026356
                4778cea6-5762-44b7-ab76-88c1347a1a10
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article