12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring the well-being of people with dementia: a conceptual scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Enabling people with dementia to ‘live well’ is a policy and research priority in many countries. However, instruments for measuring outcomes of psychosocial interventions designed to promote well-being in dementia are often derived from a symptom-focused, loss/deficit approach, or from broad quality of life concepts. A pan-European dementia working group called for research on the development of an alternative asset/strengths-based conceptual framework of well-being in dementia. This paper takes forward this recommendation by developing such a framework and using this to map relevant self-report outcome measures.

          Methods

          Three scoping reviews of published studies were conducted iteratively. First, we examined the literature on lived experiences of well-being and quality of life in people with dementia and then the wider dementia literature for application of well-being constructs. The synthesised findings generated conceptual domains of well-being in people with dementia. Corresponding self-report instruments used in dementia research were scoped, categorised within the conceptual framework and their potential value in measuring outcomes for people with dementia was examined.

          Findings

          Six conceptual domains for the measurement of well-being and 35 self-report instruments that have been used with people with dementia were identified. Six instruments were developed specifically for people with dementia, five were derived from the gerontological literature and 24 from the well-being literature. Fifteen instruments and one sub-scale have been examined for psychometric properties amongst people with dementia. To date, 20 have been used as outcome measures, with seven measuring change over time. A number of identified instruments utilise traditional retrospective Likert-scaling response formats, limiting their potential for use with some groups of people with dementia.

          Conclusion

          An assets/strengths-based framework is presented, outlining structural domains for selecting self-report measures of well-being in people with dementia. It provides a foundation for enhancing research into processes and outcomes of psychosocial interventions, including instrument development, more precise matching of intervention aims with outcome measurement, and newer technology-based ‘in-the-moment’ measurement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references142

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

              This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.clarke@hull.ac.uk
                b.woods@bangor.ac.uk
                E.D.Moniz-Cook@hull.ac.uk
                G.Mountain@bradford.ac.uk
                Laila.Oeksnebjerg.02@regionh.dk
                rabih.chattat@unibo.it
                Ana.Diaz@alzheimer-europe.org
                Dianne.Gove@alzheimer-europe.org
                myrra.vernooij-dassen@radboud.nl
                E.Wolverson@hull.ac.uk
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                24 July 2020
                24 July 2020
                2020
                : 18
                : 249
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9481.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0412 8669, Faculty of Health Sciences, , University of Hull, ; Hull, HU6 7RX UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.7362.0, ISNI 0000000118820937, DSDC Wales, Bangor University, Ardudwy, ; Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PZ UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.6268.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0379 5283, School of Dementia Studies, , University of Bradford, ; Richmond Rd, Bradford, BD7 1DP UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.475435.4, Danish Dementia Research Centre, , Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, ; Section 6922, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
                [5 ]GRID grid.6292.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 1758, Department of Psychology Università di Bologna - Via Zamboni, ; 33 - 40126 Bologna, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.424021.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0739 010X, Alzheimer Europe, ; L-1417 14, rue Dicks, Luxembourg
                [7 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Radboud University Medical Centre, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, ; IQ Healthcare 114, PO Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8957-0795
                Article
                1440
                10.1186/s12955-020-01440-x
                7382062
                32709238
                47e49bc6-3deb-4aac-ab5e-8dee45599272
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 14 May 2019
                : 5 June 2020
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                dementia,outcome measurement,well-being,quality of life,positive psychology,successful aging,lived experience

                Comments

                Comment on this article