Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Metagenomic, phylogenetic, and functional characterization of predominant endolithic green sulfur bacteria in the coral Isopora palifera

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Endolithic microbes in coral skeletons are known to be a nutrient source for the coral host. In addition to aerobic endolithic algae and Cyanobacteria, which are usually described in the various corals and form a green layer beneath coral tissues, the anaerobic photoautotrophic green sulfur bacteria (GSB) Prosthecochloris is dominant in the skeleton of Isopora palifera. However, due to inherent challenges in studying anaerobic microbes in coral skeleton, the reason for its niche preference and function are largely unknown.

          Results

          This study characterized a diverse and dynamic community of endolithic microbes shaped by the availability of light and oxygen. In addition, anaerobic bacteria isolated from the coral skeleton were cultured for the first time to experimentally clarify the role of these GSB. This characterization includes GSB’s abundance, genetic and genomic profiles, organelle structure, and specific metabolic functions and activity. Our results explain the advantages endolithic GSB receive from living in coral skeletons, the potential metabolic role of a clade of coral-associated Prosthecochloris (CAP) in the skeleton, and the nitrogen fixation ability of CAP.

          Conclusion

          We suggest that the endolithic microbial community in coral skeletons is diverse and dynamic and that light and oxygen are two crucial factors for shaping it. This study is the first to demonstrate the ability of nitrogen uptake by specific coral-associated endolithic bacteria and shed light on the role of endolithic bacteria in coral skeletons.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0616-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms.

          Ocean acidification is a pervasive stressor that could affect many marine organisms and cause profound ecological shifts. A variety of biological responses to ocean acidification have been measured across a range of taxa, but this information exists as case studies and has not been synthesized into meaningful comparisons amongst response variables and functional groups. We used meta-analytic techniques to explore the biological responses to ocean acidification, and found negative effects on survival, calcification, growth and reproduction. However, there was significant variation in the sensitivity of marine organisms. Calcifying organisms generally exhibited larger negative responses than non-calcifying organisms across numerous response variables, with the exception of crustaceans, which calcify but were not negatively affected. Calcification responses varied significantly amongst organisms using different mineral forms of calcium carbonate. Organisms using one of the more soluble forms of calcium carbonate (high-magnesium calcite) can be more resilient to ocean acidification than less soluble forms (calcite and aragonite). Additionally, there was variation in the sensitivities of different developmental stages, but this variation was dependent on the taxonomic group. Our analyses suggest that the biological effects of ocean acidification are generally large and negative, but the variation in sensitivity amongst organisms has important implications for ecosystem responses. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria.

            Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are anaerobic microorganisms that use sulphate as a terminal electron acceptor in, for example, the degradation of organic compounds. They are ubiquitous in anoxic habitats, where they have an important role in both the sulphur and carbon cycles. SRB can cause a serious problem for industries, such as the offshore oil industry, because of the production of sulphide, which is highly reactive, corrosive and toxic. However, these organisms can also be beneficial by removing sulphate and heavy metals from waste streams. Although SRB have been studied for more than a century, it is only with the recent emergence of new molecular biological and genomic techniques that we have begun to obtain detailed information on their way of life.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms.

              A combination of fluorescent rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes ("phylogenetic stains") and flow cytometry was used for a high resolution automated analysis of mixed microbial populations. Fixed cells of bacteria and yeasts were hybridized in suspension with fluorescein- or tetramethylrhodamine-labeled oligonucleotide probes complementary to group-specific regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) molecules. Quantifying probe-conferred cell fluorescence by flow cytometry, we could discriminate between target and nontarget cell populations. We critically examined changes of the hybridization conditions, kinetics of the hybridization, and posthybridization treatments. Intermediate probe concentrations, addition of detergent to the hybridization buffer, and a posthybridization washing step were found to increase the signal to noise ratio. We could demonstrate a linear correlation between growth rate and probe-conferred fluorescence of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas cepacia cells. Oligonucleotides labeled with multiple fluorochromes showed elevated levels of nonspecific binding and therefore could not be used to lower the detection limits, which still restrict studies with fluorescing rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to well-growing microbial cells. Two probes of different specificities--one labeled with fluorescein, the other with tetramethylrhodamine--could be applied simultaneously for dual color analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mushroom0512@gmail.com
                kshitijtandon1990@gmail.com
                genelu1859@gmail.com
                naohisa0308.nw@gmail.com
                cjs23@firdi.org.tw
                agno3hsiao@gmail.com
                wnjane@gate.sinica.edu.tw
                crane173@yahoo.com.tw
                cmyang@gate.sinica.edu.tw
                chiteliu@ntu.edu.tw
                vianney.denis@gmail.com
                yutingwu@mail.npust.edu.tw
                wlt@firdi.org.tw
                hln@firdi.org.tw
                dclee@earth.sinica.edu.tw
                yuwei.wu@tmu.edu.tw
                hyama@lab.u-ryukyu.ac.jp
                sltang@gate.sinica.edu.tw
                Journal
                Microbiome
                Microbiome
                Microbiome
                BioMed Central (London )
                2049-2618
                4 January 2019
                4 January 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2287 1366, GRID grid.28665.3f, Biodiversity Research Center, , Academia Sinica, ; Taipei, 11529 Taiwan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0685 5104, GRID grid.267625.2, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, , University of the Ryukyus, ; Okinawa, 905-0227 Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0532 1428, GRID grid.265231.1, Department of Life Science, , Tunghai University, ; Taichung, 40704 Taiwan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0532 1428, GRID grid.265231.1, Center for Ecology and Environment, , Tunghai University, ; Taichung, 40704 Taiwan
                [5 ]Bioinformatics Program, Institute of Information Science, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529 Taiwan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0532 0580, GRID grid.38348.34, Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, , National Tsing Hua University, ; Hsinchu, 30013 Taiwan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9608 6611, GRID grid.417912.8, Bioresource Collection and Research Center, , Food Industry Research and Development Institute, ; Hsinchu, 30062 Taiwan
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2287 1366, GRID grid.28665.3f, Institute of Earth Sciences, , Academia Sinica, ; Taipei, 11529 Taiwan
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2287 1366, GRID grid.28665.3f, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, , Academia Sinica, ; Taipei, 11529 Taiwan
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2287 1366, GRID grid.28665.3f, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, , Academia Sinica, ; Taipei, 11529 Taiwan
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0546 0241, GRID grid.19188.39, Institute of Biotechnology, , National Taiwan University, ; Taipei, 10672 Taiwan
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0546 0241, GRID grid.19188.39, Institute of Oceanography, , National Taiwan University, ; Taipei, 10617 Taiwan
                [13 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9767 1257, GRID grid.412083.c, Department of Forestry, , National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, ; Pintung, 91201 Taiwan
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9337 0481, GRID grid.412896.0, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, , Taipei Medical University, ; Taipei, 11031 Taiwan
                Article
                616
                10.1186/s40168-018-0616-z
                6320609
                30609942
                486c19d8-3880-41f5-bdcd-3745523d1832
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 16 August 2018
                : 21 December 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004663, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan;
                Award ID: MOST 105-2621-B-001-004-MY3
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                green sulfur bacteria,endoliths,isopora palifera,anaerobic cultivation,nitrogen fixation

                Comments

                Comment on this article