1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Randomized comparison of low-dose involved-field radiotherapy and no radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin's disease who achieve a complete response to chemotherapy.

      Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
      Adolescent, Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, administration & dosage, therapeutic use, Bleomycin, Child, Child, Preschool, Combined Modality Therapy, Cyclophosphamide, Disease-Free Survival, Doxorubicin, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hodgkin Disease, drug therapy, pathology, radiotherapy, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Lymph Nodes, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Prednisone, Procarbazine, Radiotherapy Dosage, Remission Induction, Salvage Therapy, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Vinblastine, Vincristine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current standard therapy for children and adolescents with Hodgkin's disease includes combination chemotherapy and low-dose involved-field radiation (LD-IFRT). Because radiation may be associated with adverse late effects, the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) investigated whether radiation could be omitted in patients achieving a complete response to initial chemotherapy without jeopardizing the excellent outcome obtained with combined-modality therapy. Between January 1995 and December 1998, 829 eligible patients were enrolled onto CCG 5942. A total of 501 patients who achieved an initial complete response after risk-adapted combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive LD-IFRT or no further treatment. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival were assessed from the date of study entry or the date of randomization, as appropriate. The projected 3-year EFS from study entry for the entire cohort was 87% +/- 1.2%. Among patients who achieved a complete response to initial chemotherapy, 92% +/- 1.9% of those randomized to receive LD-IFRT were alive and disease free 3 years after randomization, versus 87% +/- 2.2% for patients randomized to receive no further therapy (stratified log-rank test; P =.057). With an "as-treated" analysis, 3-year EFS after randomization for the radiation cohort was 93% +/- 1.7% versus 85% +/- 2.3% for patients receiving no further therapy (stratified log-rank test; P =.0024). Three-year survival estimates for patients treated with and without LD-IFRT were 98% +/- 1.1% for patients who received radiation and 99% +/- 0.5% for patients who did not receive radiation. LD-IFRT after an initial complete response to risk-adapted chemotherapy improved EFS. At this time, there is no survival advantage for LD-IFRT, but follow-up remains short.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article