25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective Detection of Early Lung Cancer in Patients With COPD in Regular Care by Electronic Nose Analysis of Exhaled Breath

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with COPD are at high risk of lung cancer developing, but no validated predictive biomarkers have been reported to identify these patients. Molecular profiling of exhaled breath by electronic nose (eNose) technology may qualify for early detection of lung cancer in patients with COPD.

          Research Question

          Can eNose technology be used for prospective detection of early lung cancer in patients with COPD?

          Study Design and Methods

          BreathCloud is a real-world multicenter prospective follow-up study using diagnostic and monitoring visits in day-to-day clinical care of patients with a standardized diagnosis of asthma, COPD, or lung cancer. Breath profiles were collected at inclusion in duplicate by a metal-oxide semiconductor eNose positioned at the rear end of a pneumotachograph (SpiroNose; Breathomix). All patients with COPD were managed according to standard clinical care, and the incidence of clinically diagnosed lung cancer was prospectively monitored for 2 years. Data analysis involved advanced signal processing, ambient air correction, and statistics based on principal component (PC) analysis, linear discriminant analysis, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

          Results

          Exhaled breath data from 682 patients with COPD and 211 patients with lung cancer were available. Thirty-seven patients with COPD (5.4%) demonstrated clinically manifest lung cancer within 2 years after inclusion. Principal components 1, 2, and 3 were significantly different between patients with COPD and those with lung cancer in both training and validation sets with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89). The same three PCs showed significant differences ( P < .01) at baseline between patients with COPD who did and did not subsequently demonstrate lung cancer within 2 years, with a cross-validation value of 87% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95).

          Interpretation

          Exhaled breath analysis by eNose identified patients with COPD in whom lung cancer became clinically manifest within 2 years after inclusion. These results show that eNose assessment may detect early stages of lung cancer in patients with COPD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

          (2011)
          The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer. From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U.S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009. The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P=0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P=0.02). Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; National Lung Screening Trial ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary

              American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 195(5), 557-582
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Chest
                Chest
                Chest
                American College of Chest Physicians
                0012-3692
                1931-3543
                19 May 2023
                November 2023
                19 May 2023
                : 164
                : 5
                : 1315-1324
                Affiliations
                [a ]Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [b ]Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [c ]The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [d ]Breathomix B.V, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [e ]Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [f ]Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [g ]Diagnostiek voor U, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [h ]Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [] CORRESPONDENCE TO: Rianne de Vries, PhD riannedevries1@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0012-3692(23)00754-7
                10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.050
                10635840
                37209772
                4aa833df-3f33-46bb-8ff8-60be4584b225
                © 2023 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Thoracic Oncology: Original Research

                Respiratory medicine
                breath test,breathomics,copd,early detection,enose,lung cancer
                Respiratory medicine
                breath test, breathomics, copd, early detection, enose, lung cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article