14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Pilot Digital Intervention Targeting Loneliness in Youth Mental Health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Loneliness is an emerging issue for young people, but yet many interventions to address loneliness in this group focus on providing social opportunities. While these sorts of interventions may appear to increase social connections, loneliness is more related to quality rather than quantity of social relationships. Thus, interventions addressing loneliness should focus on maximizing the quality of current relationships. Together with youth consumers both with mental ill health and those without, we developed a digital smartphone application (app) called +Connect. The 6-week program delivers positive psychology content designed to improve relationship quality. We tested the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of the program in lonely young people with or without a mental health diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. We used a mixed method study design to triangulate pilot quantitative and qualitative data in young people with and without social anxiety disorder (SAD).

          Method: Nine participants with a diagnosis of social anxiety disorder ( M age = 21.00; SD = 1.41) and 11 participants with no mental health conditions ( M age = 20.36; SD = 2.16) completed the +Connect digital intervention.

          Results: Those with social anxiety disorder reported less acceptable ratings on outcomes. Feasibility ratings, measured by uptake and app completion, met a priori threshold criteria in both groups. Those with social anxiety disorder yielded more attrition, with almost double the attrition rate compared with those without the disorder. There were no safety issues elicited during the pilot study. In terms of outcomes, exploratory analyses indicated that the app itself is likely to be beneficial rather than cause harm. Our qualitative data indicated both groups reported no negative outcomes and noted that positive outcomes were driven by three processes: reflection, learning, and real-life application. Further exploratory data on usability indicated room for improvement in terms of giving more support for different components of the app (i.e., challenges).

          Conclusion: The pilot findings of this proof-of-concept app indicates some promise in terms of a second iterative version of +Connect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

          L Radloff (1977)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.

            Actual and perceived social isolation are both associated with increased risk for early mortality. In this meta-analytic review, our objective is to establish the overall and relative magnitude of social isolation and loneliness and to examine possible moderators. We conducted a literature search of studies (January 1980 to February 2014) using MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar. The included studies provided quantitative data on mortality as affected by loneliness, social isolation, or living alone. Across studies in which several possible confounds were statistically controlled for, the weighted average effect sizes were as follows: social isolation odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, loneliness OR = 1.26, and living alone OR = 1.32, corresponding to an average of 29%, 26%, and 32% increased likelihood of mortality, respectively. We found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region, but initial health status has an influence on the findings. Results also differ across participant age, with social deficits being more predictive of death in samples with an average age younger than 65 years. Overall, the influence of both objective and subjective social isolation on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies.

              Most studies of social relationships in later life focus on the amount of social contact, not on individuals' perceptions of social isolation. However, loneliness is likely to be an important aspect of aging. A major limiting factor in studying loneliness has been the lack of a measure suitable for large-scale social surveys. This article describes a short loneliness scale developed specifically for use on a telephone survey. The scale has three items and a simplified set of response categories but appears to measure overall loneliness quite well. The authors also document the relationship between loneliness and several commonly used measures of objective social isolation. As expected, they find that objective and subjective isolation are related. However, the relationship is relatively modest, indicating that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of social relationships are distinct. This result suggests the importance of studying both dimensions of social relationships in the aging process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                23 August 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 604
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [2] 2Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [3] 3Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University St. Louis , Missouri, MO, United States
                [4] 4School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [5] 5Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill , North Carolina, NC, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Frank M. Schmidt, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

                Reviewed by: Julian A. Rubel, University of Giessen, Germany; Casimiro Cabrera Abreu, Queens University, Canada

                *Correspondence: Michelle H. Lim, mlim@ 123456swin.edu.au

                This article was submitted to Mood and Anxiety Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00604
                6716464
                31507469
                4c74cc1d-54f1-48b3-8649-6f0037c77a9e
                Copyright © 2019 Lim, Rodebaugh, Eres, Long, Penn and Gleeson

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 February 2019
                : 30 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 8, Equations: 0, References: 63, Pages: 13, Words: 8564
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                loneliness,social anxiety disorder,positive psychology intervention,digital intervention,youth mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article