41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies?

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When navigating, women typically focus on landmarks within the environment, whereas men tend to focus on the Euclidean properties of the environment. However, it is unclear whether these observed differences in navigational skill result from disparate strategies or disparate ability. To remove this confound, the present study required participants to follow either landmark- or Euclidean-based instructions during a navigation task (either in the real-world or on paper). Men performed best when using Euclidean information, whereas women performed best when using landmark information, suggesting a dimorphic capacity to use these 2 types of spatial information. Further, a significant correlation was observed between the mental rotation task and the ability to use Euclidean information, but not the ability to use landmark information.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.

            A new paper-and-pencil test of spatial visualization was constructed from the figures used in the chronometric study of Shepard and Metzler (1971). In large samples, the new test displayed substantial internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20 = .88), a test-retest reliability (.83), and consistent sex differences over the entire range of ages investigated. Correlations with other measures indicated strong association with tests of spatial visualization and virtually no association with tests of verbal ability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability.

              Blindfolded sighted, adventitiously blind, and congenitally blind subjects performed a set of navigation tasks. The more complex tasks involved spatial inference and included retracing a multisegment route in reverse, returning directly to an origin after being led over linear segments, and pointing to targets after locomotion. As a group, subjects responded systematically to route manipulations in the complex tasks, but performance was poor. Patterns of error and response latency are informative about the internal representation used; in particular, they do not support the hypothesis that only a representation of the origin of locomotion is maintained. The slight performance differences between groups varying in visual experience were neither large nor consistent across tasks. Results provide little indication that spatial competence strongly depends on prior visual experience.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behavioral Neuroscience
                Behavioral Neuroscience
                American Psychological Association (APA)
                1939-0084
                0735-7044
                2002
                2002
                : 116
                : 3
                : 403-410
                Article
                10.1037/0735-7044.116.3.403
                12049321
                4cb38db6-5bc7-4e8f-be2b-b2f6a2bffc1c
                © 2002
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article