11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Identifying drivers of forest resilience in long-term records from the Neotropics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Here, we use 30 long-term, high-resolution palaeoecological records from Mexico, Central and South America to address two hypotheses regarding possible drivers of resilience in tropical forests as measured in terms of recovery rates from previous disturbances. First, we hypothesize that faster recovery rates are associated with regions of higher biodiversity, as suggested by the insurance hypothesis. And second, that resilience is due to intrinsic abiotic factors that are location specific, thus regions presently displaying resilience in terms of persistence to current climatic disturbances should also show higher recovery rates in the past. To test these hypotheses, we applied a threshold approach to identify past disturbances to forests within each sequence. We then compared the recovery rates to these events with pollen richness before the event. We also compared recovery rates of each site with a measure of present resilience in the region as demonstrated by measuring global vegetation persistence to climatic perturbations using satellite imagery. Preliminary results indeed show a positive relationship between pre-disturbance taxonomic richness and faster recovery rates. However, there is less evidence to support the concept that resilience is intrinsic to a region; patterns of resilience apparent in ecosystems presently are not necessarily conservative through time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pre-Columbian landscape impact and agriculture in the Monumental Mound region of the Llanos de Moxos, lowland Bolivia

          We present a multiproxy study of land use by a pre-Columbian earth mounds culture in the Bolivian Amazon. The Monumental Mounds Region (MMR) is an archaeological sub-region characterized by hundreds of pre-Columbian habitation mounds associated with a complex network of canals and causeways, and situated in the forest–savanna mosaic of the Llanos de Moxos . Pollen, phytolith, and charcoal analyses were performed on a sediment core from a large lake (14 km 2 ), Laguna San José (14°56.97′S, 64°29.70′W). We found evidence of high levels of anthropogenic burning from AD 400 to AD 1280, corroborating dated occupation layers in two nearby excavated habitation mounds. The charcoal decline pre-dates the arrival of Europeans by at least 100 yr, and challenges the notion that the mounds culture declined because of European colonization. We show that the surrounding savanna soils were sufficiently fertile to support crops, and the presence of maize throughout the record shows that the area was continuously cultivated despite land-use change at the end of the earth mounds culture. We suggest that burning was largely confined to the savannas, rather than forests, and that pre-Columbian deforestation was localized to the vicinity of individual habitation mounds, whereas the inter-mound areas remained largely forested.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Second international symposium in information theory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Late-Quaternary savanna history of the Colombian Llanos Orientales from Lagunas Chenevo and Mozambique: A transect synthesis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Biology Letters
                Biol. Lett.
                The Royal Society
                1744-9561
                1744-957X
                April 2020
                April 2020
                April 2020
                : 16
                : 4
                : 20200005
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Long-Term Ecology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [2 ]Biodiversity Informatics and Spatial Analysis, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK
                [3 ]School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [4 ]University of Göttingen, Department of Palynology and Climate Dynamics, Albrecht-von-Haller Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
                [5 ]School of Geography, Geology and Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
                [6 ]Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Facultad de Biología. Morelia, México
                [7 ]Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico
                [8 ]Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Departamento de Conservación de la Biodiversidad, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Chetumal, Mexico
                [10 ]Department of Anthropology and IIIRMES, California State University, Long Beach, USA
                [11 ]Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
                [12 ]Institute of Northern Engineering and College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, USA
                Article
                10.1098/rsbl.2020.0005
                7211461
                32228400
                4cf1918f-2c66-4a5b-8b7e-420b02e9d2eb
                © 2020

                https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article