1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Group-based storytelling in disease self-management among people with diabetes

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We explored the underlying mechanisms by which storytelling can promote disease self-management among people with type 2 diabetes.

          Methods

          Two, eight-session storytelling interventions were delivered to a total of eight adults with type 2 diabetes at a community health center in Toronto, Ontario. Each week, participants shared stories about diabetes self-management topics of their choice. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, transcripts from each session and focus groups conducted during and following the intervention were coded and analyzed using NVivo software. Through content analysis, we identified categories that describe processes and benefits of the intervention that may contribute to and support diabetes self-management.

          Results

          Our analysis suggests that storytelling facilitates knowledge exchange, collaborative learning, reflection, and making meaning of one’s disease. These processes, in turn, could potentially build a sense of community that facilitates peer support, empowerment, and active engagement in disease self-management.

          Conclusion

          Venues that offer patients opportunities to speak of their illness management experiences are currently limited in our healthcare systems. In conjunction with traditional diabetes self-management education, storytelling can support several core aspects of diabetes self-management. Our findings could guide the design and/or evaluation of future story-based interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The qualitative content analysis process.

          This paper is a description of inductive and deductive content analysis. Content analysis is a method that may be used with either qualitative or quantitative data and in an inductive or deductive way. Qualitative content analysis is commonly used in nursing studies but little has been published on the analysis process and many research books generally only provide a short description of this method. When using content analysis, the aim was to build a model to describe the phenomenon in a conceptual form. Both inductive and deductive analysis processes are represented as three main phases: preparation, organizing and reporting. The preparation phase is similar in both approaches. The concepts are derived from the data in inductive content analysis. Deductive content analysis is used when the structure of analysis is operationalized on the basis of previous knowledge. Inductive content analysis is used in cases where there are no previous studies dealing with the phenomenon or when it is fragmented. A deductive approach is useful if the general aim was to test a previous theory in a different situation or to compare categories at different time periods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Whatever happened to qualitative description?

            The general view of descriptive research as a lower level form of inquiry has influenced some researchers conducting qualitative research to claim methods they are really not using and not to claim the method they are using: namely, qualitative description. Qualitative descriptive studies have as their goal a comprehensive summary of events in the everyday terms of those events. Researchers conducting qualitative descriptive studies stay close to their data and to the surface of words and events. Qualitative descriptive designs typically are an eclectic but reasonable combination of sampling, and data collection, analysis, and re-presentation techniques. Qualitative descriptive study is the method of choice when straight descriptions of phenomena are desired. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons,
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited.

              "Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?" (Sandelowski, 2000) was written to critique the prevailing tendency in qualitative health research to claim the use of methods that were not actually used and to clarify a methodological approach rarely identified as a distinctive method. The article has generated several misconceptions, most notably that qualitative description requires no interpretation of data. At the root of these misconceptions is the persistent challenge of defining qualitative research methods. Qualitative description is a "distributed residual category" (Bowker & Star, 2000). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) in the classification of these methods. Its value lies not only in the knowledge its use can produce, but also as a vehicle for presenting and treating research methods as living entities that resist simple classification.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chronic Illn
                Chronic Illn
                CHI
                spchi
                Chronic Illness
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1742-3953
                1745-9206
                2 July 2019
                September 2021
                : 17
                : 3
                : 306-320
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Enza Gucciardi, School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Kerr Hall South, Room 349-I; Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada. Email: egucciar@ 123456ryerson.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-5729
                Article
                10.1177_1742395319859395
                10.1177/1742395319859395
                8414823
                31266352
                4d94e4cc-99a8-472d-af9b-0e764d3a9f14
                © The Author(s) 2019

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 30 April 2018
                : 13 May 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Ryerson University Health Research Fund;
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts19

                diabetes,self-management,storytelling,narratives,story-based interventions

                Comments

                Comment on this article