25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Control of eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis by inositol polyphosphate sensor domains.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Phosphorus is a macronutrient taken up by cells as inorganic phosphate (P(i)). How cells sense cellular P(i) levels is poorly characterized. Here, we report that SPX domains--which are found in eukaryotic phosphate transporters, signaling proteins, and inorganic polyphosphate polymerases--provide a basic binding surface for inositol polyphosphate signaling molecules (InsPs), the concentrations of which change in response to P(i) availability. Substitutions of critical binding surface residues impair InsP binding in vitro, inorganic polyphosphate synthesis in yeast, and P(i) transport in Arabidopsis In plants, InsPs trigger the association of SPX proteins with transcription factors to regulate P(i) starvation responses. We propose that InsPs communicate cytosolic P(i) levels to SPX domains and enable them to interact with a multitude of proteins to regulate P(i) uptake, transport, and storage in fungi, plants, and animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants

          W Kabsch (1993)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Jasmonate perception by inositol phosphate-potentiated COI1-JAZ co-receptor

            Jasmonates (JAs) are a family of plant hormones that regulate plant growth, development, and responses to stress. The F-box protein CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE 1 (COI1) mediates JA signaling by promoting hormone-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of transcriptional repressor JAZ proteins. Despite its importance, the mechanism of JA perception remains unclear. Here we present structural and pharmacological data to show that the true JA receptor is a complex of both COI1 and JAZ. COI1 contains an open pocket that recognizes the bioactive hormone, (3R,7S)-jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile), with high specificity. High-affinity hormone binding requires a bipartite JAZ degron sequence consisting of a conserved α-helix for COI1 docking and a loop region to trap the hormone in its binding pocket. In addition, we identify a third critical component of the JA co-receptor complex, inositol pentakisphosphate, which interacts with both COI1 and JAZ adjacent to the ligand. Our results unravel the mechanism of JA perception and highlight the ability of F-box proteins to evolve as multi-component signaling hubs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces.

              Because of their wide use in molecular modeling, methods to compute molecular surfaces have received a lot of interest in recent years. However, most of the proposed algorithms compute the analytical representation of only the solvent-accessible surface. There are a few programs that compute the analytical representation of the solvent-excluded surface, but they often have problems handling singular cases of self-intersecting surfaces and tend to fail on large molecules (more than 10,000 atoms). We describe here a program called MSMS, which is shown to be fast and reliable in computing molecular surfaces. It relies on the use of the reduced surface that is briefly defined here and from which the solvent-accessible and solvent-excluded surfaces are computed. The four algorithms composing MSMS are described and their complexity is analyzed. Special attention is given to the handling of self-intersecting parts of the solvent-excluded surface called singularities. The program has been compared with Connolly's program PQMS [M.L. Connolly (1993) Journal of Molecular Graphics, Vol. 11, pp. 139-141] on a set of 709 molecules taken from the Brookhaven Data Base. MSMS was able to compute topologically correct surfaces for each molecule in the set. Moreover, the actual time spent to compute surfaces is in agreement with the theoretical complexity of the program, which is shown to be O[n log(n)] for n atoms. On a Hewlett-Packard 9000/735 workstation, MSMS takes 0.73 s to produce a triangulated solvent-excluded surface for crambin (1 crn, 46 residues, 327 atoms, 4772 triangles), 4.6 s for thermolysin (3tln, 316 residues, 2437 atoms, 26462 triangles), and 104.53 s for glutamine synthetase (2gls, 5676 residues, 43632 atoms, 476665 triangles).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Science
                Science (New York, N.Y.)
                1095-9203
                0036-8075
                May 20 2016
                : 352
                : 6288
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Structural Plant Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany and Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
                [2 ] Department of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [3 ] Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [4 ] Department of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
                [5 ] Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
                [6 ] Medical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.
                [7 ] Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. Institute of Organic Chemistry, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
                [8 ] Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. yves.poirier@unil.ch michael.hothorn@unige.ch andreas.mayer@unil.ch.
                [9 ] Structural Plant Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany and Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. yves.poirier@unil.ch michael.hothorn@unige.ch andreas.mayer@unil.ch.
                [10 ] Department of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. yves.poirier@unil.ch michael.hothorn@unige.ch andreas.mayer@unil.ch.
                Article
                science.aad9858
                10.1126/science.aad9858
                27080106
                4da96e12-9ae9-41ab-a516-347832c0eaac
                Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article