12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A physiological approach for assessing human survivability and liveability to heat in a changing climate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most studies projecting human survivability limits to extreme heat with climate change use a 35 °C wet-bulb temperature (T w) threshold without integrating variations in human physiology. This study applies physiological and biophysical principles for young and older adults, in sun or shade, to improve current estimates of survivability and introduce liveability (maximum safe, sustained activity) under current and future climates. Our physiology-based survival limits show a vast underestimation of risks by the 35 °C T w model in hot-dry conditions. Updated survivability limits correspond to T w~25.8–34.1 °C (young) and ~21.9–33.7 °C (old)—0.9–13.1 °C lower than T w = 35 °C. For older female adults, estimates are ~7.2–13.1 °C lower than 35 °C in dry conditions. Liveability declines with sun exposure and humidity, yet most dramatically with age (2.5–3.0 METs lower for older adults). Reductions in safe activity for younger and older adults between the present and future indicate a stronger impact from aging than warming.

          Abstract

          Research examining the ability to survive or safely live under extreme heat often oversimplifies human exposure and responses. Here, the authors apply a physiology-based approach for young and older adults to improve survivability estimates and introduce liveability in current and future climates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

          By coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current, and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science. However, the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. After a long and wide community consultation, a new and more federated structure has been put in place. It consists of three major elements: (1) a handful of common experiments, the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima) and CMIP historical simulations (1850–near present) that will maintain continuity and help document basic characteristics of models across different phases of CMIP; (2) common standards, coordination, infrastructure, and documentation that will facilitate the distribution of model outputs and the characterization of the model ensemble; and (3) an ensemble of CMIP-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) that will be specific to a particular phase of CMIP (now CMIP6) and that will build on the DECK and CMIP historical simulations to address a large range of specific questions and fill the scientific gaps of the previous CMIP phases. The DECK and CMIP historical simulations, together with the use of CMIP data standards, will be the entry cards for models participating in CMIP. Participation in CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs by individual modelling groups will be at their own discretion and will depend on their scientific interests and priorities. With the Grand Science Challenges of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) as its scientific backdrop, CMIP6 will address three broad questions: – How does the Earth system respond to forcing? – What are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases? – How can we assess future climate changes given internal climate variability, predictability, and uncertainties in scenarios? This CMIP6 overview paper presents the background and rationale for the new structure of CMIP, provides a detailed description of the DECK and CMIP6 historical simulations, and includes a brief introduction to the 21 CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.

            The Compendium of Physical Activities was developed to enhance the comparability of results across studies using self-report physical activity (PA) and is used to quantify the energy cost of a wide variety of PA. We provide the second update of the Compendium, called the 2011 Compendium. The 2011 Compendium retains the previous coding scheme to identify the major category headings and specific PA by their rate of energy expenditure in MET. Modifications in the 2011 Compendium include cataloging measured MET values and their source references, when available; addition of new codes and specific activities; an update of the Compendium tracking guide that links information in the 1993, 2000, and 2011 compendia versions; and the creation of a Web site to facilitate easy access and downloading of Compendium documents. Measured MET values were obtained from a systematic search of databases using defined key words. The 2011 Compendium contains 821 codes for specific activities. Two hundred seventeen new codes were added, 68% (561/821) of which have measured MET values. Approximately half (317/604) of the codes from the 2000 Compendium were modified to improve the definitions and/or to consolidate specific activities and to update estimated MET values where measured values did not exist. Updated MET values accounted for 73% of all code changes. The Compendium is used globally to quantify the energy cost of PA in adults for surveillance activities, research studies, and, in clinical settings, to write PA recommendations and to assess energy expenditure in individuals. The 2011 Compendium is an update of a system for quantifying the energy cost of adult human PA and is a living document that is moving in the direction of being 100% evidence based.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Hot weather and heat extremes: health risks

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jvanos@asu.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                29 November 2023
                29 November 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 7653
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, ( https://ror.org/03efmqc40) Tempe, AZ USA
                [2 ]School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, ( https://ror.org/03efmqc40) Tempe, AZ USA
                [3 ]Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, ( https://ror.org/04gyf1771) Irvine, CA USA
                [4 ]Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, ( https://ror.org/02e2tgs60) Palisades, NY USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Medical Sciences, , Radboud university medical center, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Heat and Health Research Incubator, University of Sydney, ( https://ror.org/0384j8v12) Sydney, NSW Australia
                [7 ]Center for Health and the Global Environment, University of Washington, ( https://ror.org/00cvxb145) Seattle, WA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1854-9096
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-2743
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0055-5308
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-8236
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-6337
                Article
                43121
                10.1038/s41467-023-43121-5
                10687011
                38030628
                5140f949-9089-4f37-99ff-a0a48eeba227
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 March 2023
                : 1 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation (NSF);
                Award ID: CMMI-2045663
                Award ID: CMMI-2045663
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC);
                Award ID: 2021/GNT2009507
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Uncategorized
                risk factors,environmental health
                Uncategorized
                risk factors, environmental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article