Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy and Safety of Trabectedin or Dacarbazine for Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma After Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This multicenter study, to our knowledge, is the first phase III trial to compare trabectedin versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after prior therapy with an anthracycline and at least one additional systemic regimen.

          Patients and Methods

          Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive trabectedin or dacarbazine intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were disease control—progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, objective response rate, and duration of response—as well as safety and patient-reported symptom scoring.

          Results

          A total of 518 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either trabectedin (n = 345) or dacarbazine (n = 173). In the final analysis of PFS, trabectedin administration resulted in a 45% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with dacarbazine (median PFS for trabectedin v dacarbazine, 4.2 v 1.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.55; P < .001); benefits were observed across all preplanned subgroup analyses. The interim analysis of OS (64% censored) demonstrated a 13% reduction in risk of death in the trabectedin arm compared with dacarbazine (median OS for trabectedin v dacarbazine, 12.4 v 12.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.87; P = .37). The safety profiles were consistent with the well-characterized toxicities of both agents, and the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were myelosuppression and transient elevation of transaminases in the trabectedin arm.

          Conclusion

          Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control versus conventional dacarbazine in patients who have advanced liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma after they experience failure of prior chemotherapy. Because disease control in advanced sarcomas is a clinically relevant end point, this study supports the activity of trabectedin for patients with these malignancies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Clin Oncol
          J. Clin. Oncol
          jco
          jco
          JCO
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          American Society of Clinical Oncology
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          10 March 2016
          14 September 2015
          10 August 2016
          : 34
          : 8
          : 786-793
          Affiliations
          [1]George D. Demetri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA; Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Arthur Staddon, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Hussein Tawbi, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robin L. Jones, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Robert G. Maki, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Scott M. Schuetze, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mohammed Milhem, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Anthony Elias, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; Kristen Ganjoo, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA; Brian A. Van Tine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Andrew Dean, St John of God Hospital-Bendat Cancer Centre, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia; Nushmia Z. Khokhar, Youn Choi Park, Roland E. Knoblauch, and Trilok V. Parekh, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ; and Shreyaskumar R. Patel, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: George D. Demetri, MD, Ludwig Center at Harvard, Harvard Medical School, and Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: george_demetri@ 123456dfci.harvard.edu .
          Article
          PMC5070559 PMC5070559 5070559 624734
          10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4734
          5070559
          26371143
          51abea45-f5f8-4243-ae95-364d79a1d194
          © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
          History
          Page count
          Figures: 2, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 8
          Categories
          Rc
          Sarc2
          Sarc14
          ORIGINAL REPORTS
          Rapid Communications

          Comments

          Comment on this article