Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The validity of animal models of depression.

      Psychopharmacology
      5-Hydroxytryptophan, pharmacology, Amphetamine, Animals, Behavior, Animal, drug effects, physiology, Circadian Rhythm, Depressive Disorder, physiopathology, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Synergism, Helplessness, Learned, Humans, Kindling, Neurologic, Motor Activity, Olfactory Bulb, Predatory Behavior, Rats, Reserpine, antagonists & inhibitors, Self Stimulation, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Yohimbine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Eighteen animal models of depression are reviewed in relation to three sets of validating criteria. Of the 18 models, five could only be assessed for predictive validity, seven could be assessed for predictive and face validity, and six could potentially have predictive, face and construct validity. Some traditional models (reserpine reversal, amphetamine potentiation) are rejected as invalid; the models with the highest overall validity are the intracranial self-stimulation, chronic stress and learned helplessness models in rats, and the primate separation model.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article