2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex and gender correlates of sexually polymorphic cognition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sexually polymorphic cognition (SPC) results from the interaction between biological (birth-assigned sex (BAS), sex hormones) and socio-cultural (gender identity, gender roles, sexual orientation) factors. The literature remains quite mixed regarding the magnitude of the effects of these variables. This project used a battery of classic cognitive tests designed to assess the influence of sex hormones on cognitive performance. At the same time, we aimed to assess the inter-related and respective effects that BAS, sex hormones, and gender-related factors have on SPC.

          Methods

          We recruited 222 adults who completed eight cognitive tasks that assessed a variety of cognitive domains during a 150-min session. Subgroups were separated based on gender identity and sexual orientation and recruited as follows: cisgender heterosexual men ( n = 46), cisgender non-heterosexual men ( n = 36), cisgender heterosexual women ( n = 36), cisgender non-heterosexual women ( n = 38), gender diverse ( n = 66). Saliva samples were collected before, during, and after the test to assess testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone. Psychosocial variables were derived from self-report questionnaires.

          Results

          Cognitive performance reflects sex and gender differences that are partially consistent with the literature. Interestingly, biological factors seem to better explain differences in male-typed cognitive tasks (i.e., spatial), while psychosocial factors seem to better explain differences in female-typed cognitive tasks (i.e., verbal).

          Conclusion

          Our results establish a better comprehension of SPC over and above the effects of BAS as a binary variable. We highlight the importance of treating sex as a biological factor and gender as a socio-cultural factor together since they collectively influence SPC.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00579-8.

          Plain Language Summary

          Many studies show sex differences in cognitive abilities. In general, women outperform men in verbal tasks and fine motor skills, while men outperform women in spatial orientation and mental rotation tasks. These differences underlie research on sexually polymorphic cognition, a concept influenced by sex hormones (estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone) as well as birth-assigned sex. In addition to these biological factors, socio-cultural gender factors such as gender identity (the gender we feel and embody), gender roles (masculine and feminine expressions based on stereotypes), as well as sexual orientation are all known to influence cognition as well. We provide a broader understanding by accounting for both sex and gender factors. Our team recruited 222 adults separated into 5 sub-groups based on birth-assigned sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Each participant completed eight sexually polymorphic cognitive tasks. In this 150-min experimental protocol, saliva samples were collected before, during, and after the test to assess testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone. Psychosocial variables were derived from self-report questionnaires. Results showed that spatial cognition was better explained by biological sex factors, while verbal cognition was better explained by socio-cultural gender factors. Taken together, our findings demonstrate the importance of considering sex-based and gender-based factors collectively and, respectively, when studying sex differences in cognition.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00579-8.

          Highlights

          • Sex differences in cognition have been extensively studied but remain unclear

          • Incorporating sex and gender factors in cognitive studies is essential

          • Inclusion of sexual and gender diversity further explain cognitive sex differences

          • Contribution of each sex and gender factor depend on the cognitive function observed

          • Spatial cognition appears more sexed, while verbal cognition appears more gendered.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00579-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references191

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

          <i>Statistical Power Analysis</i> is a nontechnical guide to power analysis in research planning that provides users of applied statistics with the tools they need for more effective analysis. The Second Edition includes: <br> * a chapter covering power analysis in set correlation and multivariate methods;<br> * a chapter considering effect size, psychometric reliability, and the efficacy of "qualifying" dependent variables and;<br> * expanded power and sample size tables for multiple regression/correlation.<br>
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.

            In recent years, the magnitude, consistency, and stability across time of cognitive sex differences have been questioned. The present study examined these issues in the context of spatial abilities. A meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes from a variety of spatial ability measures was conducted. Effect sizes were partitioned by the specific test used and by a number of variables related to the experimental procedure in order to achieve homogeneity. Results showed that sex differences are significant in several tests but that some intertest differences exist. Partial support was found for the notion that the magnitude of sex differences has decreased in recent years. Finally, it was found that the age of emergence of sex differences depends on the test used. Results are discussed with regard to their implications for the study of sex differences in spatial abilities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.

              A new paper-and-pencil test of spatial visualization was constructed from the figures used in the chronometric study of Shepard and Metzler (1971). In large samples, the new test displayed substantial internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20 = .88), a test-retest reliability (.83), and consistent sex differences over the entire range of ages investigated. Correlations with other measures indicated strong association with tests of spatial visualization and virtually no association with tests of verbal ability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                robert-paul.juster@umontreal.ca
                Journal
                Biol Sex Differ
                Biol Sex Differ
                Biology of Sex Differences
                BioMed Central (London )
                2042-6410
                8 January 2024
                8 January 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center on Sex*Gender, Allostasis, and Resilience, Research Center of the Montreal Mental Health University Institute, ( https://ror.org/05ww3wq27) 7331, Rue Hochelaga, Montreal, QC H1N 3V2 Canada
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, University of Montreal, ( https://ror.org/0161xgx34) Montreal, QC Canada
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, ( https://ror.org/0161xgx34) Montreal, QC Canada
                [4 ]School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, ( https://ror.org/03c4mmv16) Ottawa, ON Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-4042
                Article
                579
                10.1186/s13293-023-00579-8
                10773055
                38191503
                53946b60-0367-47e7-a936-4b73871db9a0
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 25 July 2023
                : 21 December 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000038, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © Society for Women's Health Research and BioMed Central Ltd. 2024

                Human biology
                sexually polymorphic cognition,sex differences,sex hormones,lgbtq+,gender identity,gender roles,sexual orientation

                Comments

                Comment on this article