2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dexamethasone implantation in birdshot chorioretinopathy – long-term outcome

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To evaluate the long-term efficacy of the 0.70 mg dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR).

          Methods

          Retrospective descriptive case series of BSCR patients treated with DEX implant (DEX implant 0.70 mg, DEX). Patients receiving treatment between September 2013 and November 2016 with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 12 months were included. The outcomes of primary interest were vision-related functioning, Snellen visual acuity, ocular inflammation status, presence or absence of vasculitis, change in central macular thickness, and development of glaucoma and/or cataract. Change in vision-related functioning was evaluated by comparing the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, after DEX implant, at time of relapse, and at last FU.

          Results

          Three patients (six eyes) were included in the study and were followed for 1–3 years. They received 1–4 DEX implants OU. All patients demonstrated improvement in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 scores. Mean Snellen visual acuity better than or equal to 20/40 was seen in three eyes at baseline and five eyes at last FU. At induction, all of the patients (six eyes) had active vitritis and two (four eyes) had retinal vasculitis. All three patients (six eyes) were quiet at last FU. One patient (two eyes) developed bilateral ocular hypertension requiring topical therapy and discontinuation of DEX implants. Two patients (three eyes) developed posterior subcapsular cataract during therapy. Two patients (four eyes) showed progression of disease while on DEX therapy. All patients were eventually transitioned to systemic immunosuppressive drug therapy.

          Conclusion

          BSCR patients receiving DEX implant experienced clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported visual function as well as ocular inflammation. However, patients in this study required repeat implantation and were unable to be maintained on DEX implant long term due to development of adverse effects or progression of disease. Eventually, it was necessary to transition to systemic immunosuppressive therapy in all patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis.

          To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) for treatment of noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. In this 26-week trial, eyes with noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis were randomized to a single treatment with a 0.7-mg DEX implant (n = 77), 0.35-mg DEX implant (n = 76), or sham procedure (n = 76). The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with a vitreous haze score of 0 at week 8. The proportion of eyes with a vitreous haze score of 0 at week 8 was 47% with the 0.7-mg DEX implant, 36% with the 0.35-mg DEX implant, and 12% with the sham (P .05 at any visit). The incidence of cataract reported in the phakic eyes was 9 of 62 (15%) with the 0.7-mg DEX implant, 6 of 51 (12%) with the 0.35-mg DEX implant, and 4 of 55 (7%) with the sham (P > .05). In patients with noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis, a single DEX implant significantly improved intraocular inflammation and visual acuity persisting for 6 months. Application to Clinical Practice Dexamethasone intravitreal implant may be used safely and effectively for treatment of intermediate and posterior uveitis. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00333814.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Research criteria for the diagnosis of birdshot chorioretinopathy: results of an international consensus conference.

            To present and evaluate research criteria for the diagnosis of birdshot chorioretinopathy. Consensus statement. Investigators who attended an international conference on birdshot chorioretinopathy drafted diagnostic criteria, which were refined after comment by conference attendees. Sensitivity and specificity of the criteria were evaluated by review of 82 previously diagnosed cases and evaluation of 80 consecutive patients with other forms of uveitis. Criteria, including presence of "birdshot lesions" and mild intraocular inflammation in both eyes, are based on clinical findings in the absence of systemic disease; HLA-A29 is supportive of diagnosis, but not required. Diagnostic criteria were found to be 100% specific and 97.5% sensitive. Positive predictive value was 100%; negative predictive value was 97.6%. Standardized criteria for the diagnosis of birdshot chorioretinopathy will facilitate clinical research and the comparison of results from studies performed at different institutions by ensuring a homogeneous population of study patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dexamethasone posterior-segment drug delivery system in the treatment of macular edema resulting from uveitis or Irvine-Gass syndrome.

              To evaluate the effects of a dexamethasone intravitreous drug delivery system (dexamethasone DDS) in patients with persistent macular edema (ME) resulting from uveitis or Irvine-Gass syndrome. Randomized, prospective, single-masked, controlled trial. Three hundred and fifteen patients with persistent (>or= 90 days) ME were randomized in a multicenter study to surgical placement of 350 or 700 microg dexamethasone DDS or observation. This study evaluated the subset of patients with uveitis or Irvine-Gass syndrome (n = 41). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving a 10-letter or more improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at day 90. Change in fluorescein angiographic leakage and safety also were evaluated. At day 90, a 10-letter or more BCVA improvement was seen in 41.7% (5/12) of patients in the 350-microg group, in 53.8% (7/13) of patients in the 700-microg group, and in 14.3% (2/14) of patients in the observation group (P = .029 vs the 700-microg group). Improvement in visual acuity persisted to day 180. A 15-letter or more improvement was achieved in 53.8% (7/13) of 700-microg patients vs 7.1% (1/14) of observed patients (P = .008). There were significantly greater reductions in fluorescein leakage in treated patients than in observed patients. Dexamethasone DDS was well tolerated. Throughout the study, an increase in intraocular pressure of 10 mm Hg or more was seen in 5 of 13 patients in the 700-microg group, in 1 of 12 patients in the 350-microg group, and in no patients in the observation group. There were no reports of endophthalmitis. In patients with persistent ME resulting from uveitis or Irvine-Gass syndrome, 700-microg dexamethasone DDS was well tolerated and produced statistically significant improvements in visual acuity and fluorescein leakage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int Med Case Rep J
                Int Med Case Rep J
                International Medical Case Reports Journal
                International Medical Case Reports Journal
                Dove Medical Press
                1179-142X
                2018
                30 November 2018
                : 11
                : 349-358
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA, ys8q@ 123456hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
                [2 ]Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Yevgeniy Shildkrot, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA, Tel +1 434 982 0046, Fax +1 434 243 2896, Email ys8q@ 123456hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
                Article
                imcrj-11-349
                10.2147/IMCRJ.S164206
                6280912
                30555265
                56344210-6417-432c-85f0-467808ae6ec3
                © 2018 Bajwa et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Case Series

                birdshot chorioretinopathy,dexamethasone implant,inflammation,uveitis

                Comments

                Comment on this article