2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy of Integrating the Management of Pain and Addiction via Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) in Individuals With Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial of a Digital Cognitive Behavioral Treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Chronic pain is common among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are maintained on medications for OUD (MOUD; eg, buprenorphine or methadone). Chronic pain is associated with worse retention and higher levels of substance use. Treatment of individuals with chronic pain receiving MOUD can be challenging due to their increased clinical complexity. Given the acute and growing nature of the opioid crisis, MOUD is increasingly offered in a wide range of settings, where high-quality, clinician-delivered, empirically validated behavioral treatment for chronic pain may not be available. Therefore, digital treatments that support patient self-management of chronic pain and OUD have the potential for wider implementation to fill this gap.

          Objective

          This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Integrating the Management of Pain and Addiction via Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT), an interactive digital treatment program with asynchronous coach feedback, compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in individuals with chronic pain and OUD receiving MOUD.

          Methods

          Adult participants (n=160) receiving MOUD and reporting bothersome or high-impact chronic pain will be recruited from outpatient opioid treatment programs in Connecticut (United States) and randomized 1:1 to either IMPACT+TAU or TAU only. Participants randomized to IMPACT+TAU will complete an interactive digital treatment that includes 9 modules promoting training in pain and addiction coping skills and a progressive walking program. The program is augmented with a weekly personalized voice message from a trained coach based on daily participant-reported pain intensity and interference, craving to use opioids, sleep quality, daily steps, pain self-efficacy, MOUD adherence, and engagement with IMPACT collected through digital surveys. Outcomes will be assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months post randomization. The primary outcome is MOUD retention at 3 months post randomization (ie, post treatment). Secondary outcomes include pain interference, physical functioning, MOUD adherence, substance use, craving, pain intensity, sleep disturbance, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy. Semistructured qualitative interviews with study participants (n=34) randomized to IMPACT (completers and noncompleters) will be conducted to evaluate the usability and quality of the program and its outcomes.

          Results

          The study has received institutional review board approval and began recruitment at 1 site in July 2022. Recruitment at a second site started in January 2023, with a third and final site anticipated to begin recruitment in January 2024. Data collection is expected to continue through June 2025.

          Conclusions

          Establishing efficacy for a digital treatment for addiction and chronic pain that can be integrated into MOUD clinics will provide options for individuals with OUD, which reduce barriers to behavioral treatment. Participant feedback on the intervention will inform updates or modifications to improve engagement and efficacy.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05204576; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05204576

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          DERR1-10.2196/54342

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests

          To review empirical studies that assess saturation in qualitative research in order to identify sample sizes for saturation, strategies used to assess saturation, and guidance we can draw from these studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development of short forms from the PROMIS™ sleep disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks.

            This article reports on the development of short forms from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™) Sleep Disturbance (SD) and Sleep-Related Impairment (SRI) item banks. Results from post-hoc computerized adaptive testing (CAT) simulations, item discrimination parameters, item means, and clinical judgments were used to select the best-performing 8 items for SD and SRI. The final 8-item short forms provided less test information than the corresponding full banks, but correlated strongly with the longer forms. The short forms had greater measurement precision than the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), as indicated by larger test information values across the continuum of severity, despite having fewer total items--a major advantage for both research and clinical settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.

              This guideline provides recommendations for primary care clinicians who are prescribing opioids for chronic pain outside of active cancer treatment, palliative care, and end-of-life care. The guideline addresses 1) when to initiate or continue opioids for chronic pain; 2) opioid selection, dosage, duration, follow-up, and discontinuation; and 3) assessing risk and addressing harms of opioid use. CDC developed the guideline using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, and recommendations are made on the basis of a systematic review of the scientific evidence while considering benefits and harms, values and preferences, and resource allocation. CDC obtained input from experts, stakeholders, the public, peer reviewers, and a federally chartered advisory committee. It is important that patients receive appropriate pain treatment with careful consideration of the benefits and risks of treatment options. This guideline is intended to improve communication between clinicians and patients about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain, improve the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce the risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death. CDC has provided a checklist for prescribing opioids for chronic pain (http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38025) as well as a website (http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribingresources.html) with additional tools to guide clinicians in implementing the recommendations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                2024
                20 March 2024
                : 13
                : e54342
                Affiliations
                [1 ] VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven, CT United States
                [2 ] School of Medicine Yale University New Haven, CT United States
                [3 ] Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven, CT United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: R Ross MacLean ross.maclean@ 123456yale.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8067-7828
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-8972
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7807-6118
                https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8458-1413
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8925-8408
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-259X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9668-0308
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-2234
                https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9744-0420
                https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8703-769X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-0053
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-1467
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-6592
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-4681
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-8263
                Article
                v13i1e54342
                10.2196/54342
                10993119
                38506917
                57e62756-3f17-4743-b6a4-9f6c00a9f3af
                ©R Ross MacLean, Brett Ankawi, Mary A Driscoll, Melissa A Gordon, Tami L Frankforter, Charla Nich, Sara K Szollosy, Jennifer M Loya, Larissa Brito, Margaridha I P Ribeiro, Sara N Edmond, William C Becker, Steve Martino, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Alicia A Heapy. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 20.03.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 8 November 2023
                : 25 January 2024
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                The proposal for this study was peer reviewed by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). See the Multimedia Appendix for the peer-review report;

                chronic pain,digital treatment,medications for opioid use disorder,methadone,opioid use disorder

                Comments

                Comment on this article