1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      We-Care-Well: exploring the personal recovery of mental health caregivers through Participatory Action Research

      methods-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Family caregivers play a critical role in supporting the recovery journeys of their loved ones, yet the recovery journeys of family caregivers have not been well-explored. Using a Participatory Action Research approach, we explore the personal recovery journeys of family caregivers for individuals with mental illness. This case study involved piloting and exploring the impact of a novel online workshop series offered to mental health caregivers at Ontario Shores Center for Mental Health Sciences. Recovery courses and workshops conventionally engage patients living with mental health conditions. In the current case, the recovery model is adapted to the needs and experiences of their family caregivers, resulting in a pilot workshop series called “We Care Well”. Through participant-led discussions, interactive and take-home activities, and experiential learning, caregivers co-created workshop content and engaged in peer-learning on seven personal recovery-oriented topics. This included: self-care, resilience-building, non-violent communication, storytelling, and mental health advocacy. Throughout the sessions, participants implemented their learnings into their caregiving roles, and shared their experiences with the group to progress through their own recovery journeys. The We Care Well series was found to be an effective intervention to adapt and apply the personal recovery framework to mental health caregivers. PAR, and co-design are viable approaches to engage caregivers in mental health research, and can facilitate knowledge exchange, as well as relationship building with peers and program facilitators.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions.

          Positive psychology has flourished in the last 5 years. The authors review recent developments in the field, including books, meetings, courses, and conferences. They also discuss the newly created classification of character strengths and virtues, a positive complement to the various editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (e. g., American Psychiatric Association, 1994), and present some cross-cultural findings that suggest a surprising ubiquity of strengths and virtues. Finally, the authors focus on psychological interventions that increase individual happiness. In a 6-group, random-assignment, placebo-controlled Internet study, the authors tested 5 purported happiness interventions and 1 plausible control exercise. They found that 3 of the interventions lastingly increased happiness and decreased depressive symptoms. Positive interventions can supplement traditional interventions that relieve suffering and may someday be the practical legacy of positive psychology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

            No systematic review and narrative synthesis on personal recovery in mental illness has been undertaken. To synthesise published descriptions and models of personal recovery into an empirically based conceptual framework. Systematic review and modified narrative synthesis. Out of 5208 papers that were identified and 366 that were reviewed, a total of 97 papers were included in this review. The emergent conceptual framework consists of: (a) 13 characteristics of the recovery journey; (b) five recovery processes comprising: connectedness; hope and optimism about the future; identity; meaning in life; and empowerment (giving the acronym CHIME); and (c) recovery stage descriptions which mapped onto the transtheoretical model of change. Studies that focused on recovery for individuals of Black and minority ethnic (BME) origin showed a greater emphasis on spirituality and stigma and also identified two additional themes: culturally specific facilitating factors and collectivist notions of recovery. The conceptual framework is a theoretically defensible and robust synthesis of people's experiences of recovery in mental illness. This provides an empirical basis for future recovery-oriented research and practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Participatory action research.

              F Baum (2006)
              This glossary aims to clarify some of the key concepts associated with participatory action research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2562753/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1955454/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2661170/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2698882/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1366455/overviewRole:
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2601990/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                04 April 2024
                2024
                : 12
                : 1366144
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Research & Academics, Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences , Whitby, ON, Canada
                [2] 2Translational Research Program, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Andrew T. Olagunju, McMaster University, Canada

                Reviewed by: Mary Leamy, King's College London, United Kingdom

                Suzanna Zakaria, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang, Indonesia

                *Correspondence: Mary Chiu chium@ 123456ontarioshores.ca
                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2024.1366144
                11024292
                38638483
                585c2246-afa1-460a-8fe4-918cdf17a6fd
                Copyright © 2024 Redublo, Paul, Joshi, Arbour, Murray and Chiu.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 January 2024
                : 18 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 50, Pages: 10, Words: 7809
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                Categories
                Public Health
                Community Case Study
                Custom metadata
                Public Mental Health

                personal recovery,family and friend caregivers,mental health,participatory action research,chime framework,recovery college model

                Comments

                Comment on this article