48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article
      , MD, , PhD
      The Lancet. Respiratory medicine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Smokers increasingly use e-cigarettes for many reasons, including attempts to quit combustible cigarettes and to use nicotine where smoking is prohibited. We aimed to assess the association between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking cessation among adult cigarette smokers, irrespective of their motivation for using e-cigarettes.

          Methods

          PubMed and Web of Science were searched between April 27, 2015, and June 17, 2015. Data extracted included study location, design, population, definition and prevalence of e-cigarette use, comparison group (if applicable), cigarette consumption, level of nicotine dependence, other confounders, definition of quitting smoking, and odds of quitting smoking. The primary endpoint was cigarette smoking cessation. Odds of smoking cessation among smokers using e-cigarettes compared with smokers not using e-cigarettes were assessed using a random effects meta-analysis. A modification of the ACROBAT-NRSI tool and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess bias. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42015020382).

          Findings

          38 studies (of 577 studies identified) were included in the systematic review; all 20 studies with control groups (15 cohort studies, three cross-sectional studies, and two clinical trials) were included in random effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses. Odds of quitting cigarettes were 28% lower in those who used e-cigarettes compared with those who did not use e-cigarettes (odds ratio [OR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·57–0·91). Association of e-cigarette use with quitting did not significantly differ among studies of all smokers using e-cigarettes (irrespective of interest in quitting cigarettes) compared with studies of only smokers interested in cigarette cessation (OR 0·63, 95% CI 0·45–0·86 vs 0·86, 0·60–1·23; p=0·94). Other study characteristics (design, population, comparison group, control variables, time of exposure assessment, biochemical verification of abstinence, and definition of e-cigarette use) were also not associated with the overall effect size (p≥0·77 in all cases).

          Interpretation

          As currently being used, e-cigarettes are associated with significantly less quitting among smokers.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101605555
          41464
          Lancet Respir Med
          Lancet Respir Med
          The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
          2213-2600
          2213-2619
          21 January 2016
          14 January 2016
          February 2016
          01 February 2017
          : 4
          : 2
          : 116-128
          Affiliations
          Department of Medicine, (S Kalkhoran MD, Prof S A Glantz PhD) and Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Cardiovascular Research Institute (Prof S A Glantz), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Prof Stanton A Glantz, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA, glantz@ 123456medicine.ucsf.edu
          Article
          PMC4752870 PMC4752870 4752870 nihpa752765
          10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00521-4
          4752870
          26776875
          5a4908e4-5312-4d72-ad36-0846ef7aa2c8
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article