14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Site-Dependent Differences in DNA Methylation and Their Impact on Plant Establishment and Phosphorus Nutrition in Populus trichocarpa

      research-article
      , , , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The propagation via clonal stem cuttings is a frequent practice in tree plantations. Despite their clonal origin, the trees establish differently according to weather, temperature and nutrient availability, as well as the presence of various stresses. Here, clonal Populus trichocarpa (cv. Muhle Larson) cuttings from different sites were transferred into a common, fully nutrient supplied environment. Despite identical underlying genetics, stem cuttings derived from sites with lower phosphorus availability established worse, independent of phosphorus (P) level after transplantation. Differential growth of material from the sites was reflected in differences in the whole genome DNA methylome. Methylation differences were sequence context-dependent, but differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were apparently unrelated to P nutrition genes. Despite the undisputed negative general correlation of DNA promoter methylation with gene repression, only few of the top-ranked DMRs resulted in differential gene expression in roots or shoots. However, differential methylation was associated with site-dependent, different total amounts of microRNAs (miRNAs), with few miRNAs sequences directly targeted by differential methylation. Interestingly, in roots and shoots, the miRNA amount was dependent on the previous habitat and changed in roots in a habitat-dependent way under phosphate starvation conditions. Differentially methylated miRNAs, together with their target genes, showed P-dependent expression profiles, indicating miRNA expression differences as a P-related epigenetic modification in poplar. Together with differences in DNA methylation, such epigenetic mechanisms may explain habitat or seasonal memory in perennials and site-dependent growth performances.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning.

          Cytosine DNA methylation is important in regulating gene expression and in silencing transposons and other repetitive sequences. Recent genomic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have revealed that many endogenous genes are methylated either within their promoters or within their transcribed regions, and that gene methylation is highly correlated with transcription levels. However, plants have different types of methylation controlled by different genetic pathways, and detailed information on the methylation status of each cytosine in any given genome is lacking. To this end, we generated a map at single-base-pair resolution of methylated cytosines for Arabidopsis, by combining bisulphite treatment of genomic DNA with ultra-high-throughput sequencing using the Illumina 1G Genome Analyser and Solexa sequencing technology. This approach, termed BS-Seq, unlike previous microarray-based methods, allows one to sensitively measure cytosine methylation on a genome-wide scale within specific sequence contexts. Here we describe methylation on previously inaccessible components of the genome and analyse the DNA methylation sequence composition and distribution. We also describe the effect of various DNA methylation mutants on genome-wide methylation patterns, and demonstrate that our newly developed library construction and computational methods can be applied to large genomes such as that of mouse.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conserved Role of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Regulating Alternative Promoters

            While the methylation of DNA in 5′ promoters suppresses gene expression, the role of DNA methylation in gene bodies is unclear 1–5 . In mammals, tissue- and cell type-specific methylation is present in a small percentage of 5′ CpG island (CGI) promoters, while a far greater proportion occurs across gene bodies, coinciding with highly conserved sequences 5–10 . Tissue-specific intragenic methylation might reduce, 3 or, paradoxically, enhance transcription elongation efficiency 1,2,4,5 . Capped analysis of gene expression (CAGE) experiments also indicate that transcription commonly initiates within and between genes 11–15 . To investigate the role of intragenic methylation, we generated a map of DNA methylation from human brain encompassing 24.7 million of the 28 million CpG sites. From the dense, high-resolution coverage of CpG islands, the majority of methylated CpG islands were revealed to be in intragenic and intergenic regions, while less than 3% of CpG islands in 5′ promoters were methylated. The CpG islands in all three locations overlapped with RNA markers of transcription initiation, and unmethylated CpG islands also overlapped significantly with trimethylation of H3K4, a histone modification enriched at promoters 16 . The general and CpG-island-specific patterns of methylation are conserved in mouse tissues. An in-depth investigation of the human SHANK3 locus 17,18 and its mouse homologue demonstrated that this tissue-specific DNA methylation regulates intragenic promoter activity in vitro and in vivo. These methylation-regulated, alternative transcripts are expressed in a tissue and cell type-specific manner, and are expressed differentially within a single cell type from distinct brain regions. These results support a major role for intragenic methylation in regulating cell context-specific alternative promoters in gene bodies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis.

              MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that have recently emerged as important regulators of mRNA degradation, translational repression, and chromatin modification. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 43 miRNAs comprising 15 families have been reported thus far. In an attempt to identify novel and abiotic stress regulated miRNAs and siRNAs, we constructed a library of small RNAs from Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to dehydration, salinity, or cold stress or to the plant stress hormone abscisic acid. Sequencing of the library and subsequent analysis revealed 26 new miRNAs from 34 loci, forming 15 new families. Two of the new miRNAs from three loci are members of previously reported miR171 and miR319 families. Some of the miRNAs are preferentially expressed in specific tissues, and several are either upregulated or downregulated by abiotic stresses. Ten of the miRNAs are highly conserved in other plant species. Fifty-one potential targets with diverse function were predicted for the newly identified miRNAs based on sequence complementarity. In addition to miRNAs, we identified 102 other novel endogenous small RNAs in Arabidopsis. These findings suggest that a large number of miRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs are encoded by the Arabidopsis genome and that some of them may play important roles in plant responses to environmental stresses as well as in development and genome maintenance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                19 December 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 12
                : e0168623
                Affiliations
                [001]Crop Science Institute, Department of Nutritional Crop Physiology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
                Universität Stuttgart, GERMANY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: UL.

                • Data curation: BS.

                • Formal analysis: BS XC SM.

                • Funding acquisition: UL.

                • Investigation: BS XC SM.

                • Methodology: UL.

                • Project administration: UL.

                • Resources: UL.

                • Software: BS.

                • Supervision: UL.

                • Validation: BS.

                • Visualization: BS.

                • Writing – original draft: BS UL.

                • Writing – review & editing: BS UL.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-1055
                Article
                PONE-D-16-35767
                10.1371/journal.pone.0168623
                5167412
                27992519
                5a61c7f1-2b66-469d-bd9f-681e3be7eb63
                © 2016 Schönberger et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 September 2016
                : 2 December 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Pages: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: SPP1685, Lu673/18-1
                Award Recipient :
                This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the Priority Program SPP1685 under grant Lu673/18-1. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and life sciences
                Cell biology
                Chromosome biology
                Chromatin
                Chromatin modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Epigenetics
                Chromatin
                Chromatin modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                Chromatin
                Chromatin modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                DNA
                DNA modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                DNA
                DNA modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Epigenetics
                DNA modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                DNA modification
                DNA methylation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                Gene regulation
                MicroRNAs
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                RNA
                Non-coding RNA
                MicroRNAs
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Trees
                Poplars
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Anatomy
                Leaves
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Epigenetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Forestry
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article