143
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Conserved Role of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Regulating Alternative Promoters

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While the methylation of DNA in 5′ promoters suppresses gene expression, the role of DNA methylation in gene bodies is unclear 15 . In mammals, tissue- and cell type-specific methylation is present in a small percentage of 5′ CpG island (CGI) promoters, while a far greater proportion occurs across gene bodies, coinciding with highly conserved sequences 510 . Tissue-specific intragenic methylation might reduce, 3 or, paradoxically, enhance transcription elongation efficiency 1, 2, 4, 5 . Capped analysis of gene expression (CAGE) experiments also indicate that transcription commonly initiates within and between genes 1115 . To investigate the role of intragenic methylation, we generated a map of DNA methylation from human brain encompassing 24.7 million of the 28 million CpG sites. From the dense, high-resolution coverage of CpG islands, the majority of methylated CpG islands were revealed to be in intragenic and intergenic regions, while less than 3% of CpG islands in 5′ promoters were methylated. The CpG islands in all three locations overlapped with RNA markers of transcription initiation, and unmethylated CpG islands also overlapped significantly with trimethylation of H3K4, a histone modification enriched at promoters 16 . The general and CpG-island-specific patterns of methylation are conserved in mouse tissues. An in-depth investigation of the human SHANK3 locus 17, 18 and its mouse homologue demonstrated that this tissue-specific DNA methylation regulates intragenic promoter activity in vitro and in vivo. These methylation-regulated, alternative transcripts are expressed in a tissue and cell type-specific manner, and are expressed differentially within a single cell type from distinct brain regions. These results support a major role for intragenic methylation in regulating cell context-specific alternative promoters in gene bodies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome.

          This study describes comprehensive polling of transcription start and termination sites and analysis of previously unidentified full-length complementary DNAs derived from the mouse genome. We identify the 5' and 3' boundaries of 181,047 transcripts with extensive variation in transcripts arising from alternative promoter usage, splicing, and polyadenylation. There are 16,247 new mouse protein-coding transcripts, including 5154 encoding previously unidentified proteins. Genomic mapping of the transcriptome reveals transcriptional forests, with overlapping transcription on both strands, separated by deserts in which few transcripts are observed. The data provide a comprehensive platform for the comparative analysis of mammalian transcriptional regulation in differentiation and development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning.

            Cytosine DNA methylation is important in regulating gene expression and in silencing transposons and other repetitive sequences. Recent genomic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have revealed that many endogenous genes are methylated either within their promoters or within their transcribed regions, and that gene methylation is highly correlated with transcription levels. However, plants have different types of methylation controlled by different genetic pathways, and detailed information on the methylation status of each cytosine in any given genome is lacking. To this end, we generated a map at single-base-pair resolution of methylated cytosines for Arabidopsis, by combining bisulphite treatment of genomic DNA with ultra-high-throughput sequencing using the Illumina 1G Genome Analyser and Solexa sequencing technology. This approach, termed BS-Seq, unlike previous microarray-based methods, allows one to sensitively measure cytosine methylation on a genome-wide scale within specific sequence contexts. Here we describe methylation on previously inaccessible components of the genome and analyse the DNA methylation sequence composition and distribution. We also describe the effect of various DNA methylation mutants on genome-wide methylation patterns, and demonstrate that our newly developed library construction and computational methods can be applied to large genomes such as that of mouse.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution.

              Mammalian promoters can be separated into two classes, conserved TATA box-enriched promoters, which initiate at a well-defined site, and more plastic, broad and evolvable CpG-rich promoters. We have sequenced tags corresponding to several hundred thousand transcription start sites (TSSs) in the mouse and human genomes, allowing precise analysis of the sequence architecture and evolution of distinct promoter classes. Different tissues and families of genes differentially use distinct types of promoters. Our tagging methods allow quantitative analysis of promoter usage in different tissues and show that differentially regulated alternative TSSs are a common feature in protein-coding genes and commonly generate alternative N termini. Among the TSSs, we identified new start sites associated with the majority of exons and with 3' UTRs. These data permit genome-scale identification of tissue-specific promoters and analysis of the cis-acting elements associated with them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                11 April 2014
                8 July 2010
                24 April 2014
                : 466
                : 7303
                : 253-257
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158 USA
                [2 ]Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, 675 W. 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [3 ]Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
                [4 ]McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Verdun, QC H4H 1R3, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158 USA
                [6 ]Department of Pediatrics and Institute for Regeneration Medicine, and Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143 USA
                [7 ]Department of Genetics, Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63108 USA
                [8 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding authors: Ting Wang, twang@ 123456wustl.edu ; Joseph F. Costello, jcostello@ 123456cc.ucsf.edu
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                AKM current address: Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

                KS current address: EPFL-ISREC, SV 2818, Station 19, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.

                Article
                NIHMS202699
                10.1038/nature09165
                3998662
                20613842
                73469e51-adb8-456a-8460-6cb45691824c

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                intragenic dna methylation,alternate promoters,comparative epigenomics,shank3
                Uncategorized
                intragenic dna methylation, alternate promoters, comparative epigenomics, shank3

                Comments

                Comment on this article