94
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    13
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To help institutions collect information on undergraduate teaching practices, the authors developed a new classroom observation protocol known as the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS). This protocol allows college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty, after a short training period, to reliably characterize how faculty and students are spending their time in class.

          Abstract

          Instructors and the teaching practices they employ play a critical role in improving student learning in college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. Consequently, there is increasing interest in collecting information on the range and frequency of teaching practices at department-wide and institution-wide scales. To help facilitate this process, we present a new classroom observation protocol known as the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM or COPUS. This protocol allows STEM faculty, after a short 1.5-hour training period, to reliably characterize how faculty and students are spending their time in the classroom. We present the protocol, discuss how it differs from existing classroom observation protocols, and describe the process by which it was developed and validated. We also discuss how the observation data can be used to guide individual and institutional change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Where's the evidence that active learning works?

          Calls for reforms in the ways we teach science at all levels, and in all disciplines, are wide spread. The effectiveness of the changes being called for, employment of student-centered, active learning pedagogy, is now well supported by evidence. The relevant data have come from a number of different disciplines that include the learning sciences, cognitive psychology, and educational psychology. There is a growing body of research within specific scientific teaching communities that supports and validates the new approaches to teaching that have been adopted. These data are reviewed, and their applicability to physiology education is discussed. Some of the inherent limitations of research about teaching and learning are also discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                CBE Life Sci Educ
                CBE-LSE
                CBE-LSE
                CBE-LSE
                CBE Life Sciences Education
                American Society for Cell Biology
                1931-7913
                1931-7913
                Winter 2013
                : 12
                : 4
                : 618-627
                Affiliations
                [3]*School of Biology and Ecology and Maine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine–Orono, Orono, ME 04469-5751
                [1] Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
                [2] Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Michelle K. Smith ( michelle.k.smith@ 123456maine.edu ).
                Article
                CBE-13-08-0154
                10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
                3846513
                24297289
                5bda5868-086a-465e-be12-dfe87e743e2c
                © 2013 M. K. Smith et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2013 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).

                “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society of Cell Biology.

                History
                : 10 August 2013
                : 8 September 2013
                : 9 September 2013
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                December 2, 2013

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article