5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Insect cell cultivation: growth and kinetics

      Cytotechnology
      Springer Nature America, Inc

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Screening of insect cell lines for the production of recombinant proteins and infectious virus in the baculovirus expression system.

          Eight cell lines derived from the insects Spodoptera frugiperda, Trichoplusia ni, Mamestra brassicae, and Estigmene acrea were evaluated for recombinant beta-galactosidase and infectious virus production following infection with the baculovirus Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV). Production was assessed on a specific (per cell and per microgram of uninfected cellular protein) and on a volumetric (per milliliter) basis. Cell density was found to be an important factor in comparing the cell lines due to a density-dependent inhibition of specific protein and virus production that appeared to result from cell-cell contact. After infection of cells at low-density specific beta-galactosidase production per cell would drop between 3- and 6-fold in five of the eight cell lines when plated on tissue culture plates at near-confluent and confluent cell densities. The cell lines Sf 21 and Sf 9 were least sensitive to cell density. After accounting for cell density effects and differences in cell size, two cell lines, BTI Tn 5B1-4 and BTI TnM, were identified that were superior to the other cell lines, including Sf 21 and Sf 9, in beta-galactosidase production. Optimal volumetric and specific beta-galactosidase production from Tn 5B1-4 and TnM cells was 2-fold and 5-fold higher, respectively, in both cell lines than the optimal production from Sf 9 or Sf 21 cells. The Tn 5B1-4 cell line also had the highest viability of all the cell lines at 3 days postinfection and could be adapted to serum-free media.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparative recombinant protein production of eight insect cell lines.

            A recombinant Autographa californica baculovirus expressing secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) gene was used to evaluate the expression of a secreted glycoprotein in eight insect cell lines derived from Spodoptera frugiperda, Trichoplusia ni, Mamestra brassicae and Estigmene acrea. Because cell density was found to influence protein production, SEAP production was evaluated at optimal cell densities for each cell line on both a per cell and per milliliter basis. On a per cell basis, the T. ni-derived BTI-TN-5B1-4 cells produced a minimum of 20-fold more SEAP than the S. frugiperda-derived Sf9 or Sf2l cell lines and a minimum of 9-fold more than any of the other cell lines growing in serum-containing medium. On a per milliliter basis, BTI-TN-5B1-4 cells produced a minimum of fivefold more SEAP than any of the other cell lines tested. Using cell lines that were adapted to serum-free medium, SEAP yields were the same or better than their counterparts in serum-containing medium. At 3 days postinoculation, extracellular SEAP activity ranged from 59 to 85% of total SEAP activity with cell lines grown in serum-free and serum-containing media.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Oxygen demand and supply in cell culture

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cytotechnology
                Cytotechnology
                Springer Nature America, Inc
                0920-9069
                1573-0778
                1996
                1996
                : 20
                : 1-3
                : 43-56
                Article
                10.1007/BF00350388
                5c0cf7cb-ca50-44b2-9914-edf8e85c1307
                © 1996
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article