Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A nomogram prediction model for treatment failure in primary membranous nephropathy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) has a heterogeneous natural course. Immunosuppressive therapy is recommended for PMN patients at moderate or high risk of renal function deterioration. Prediction models for the treatment failure of PMN have rarely been reported.

          Methods

          This study retrospectively studied patients diagnosed as PMN by renal biopsy at Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. Information on clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, pathological examination, and treatment was collected. The outcome was treatment failure, defined as the lack of complete or partial remission at the end of 12 months. Simple logistic regression was used to identify candidate predictive variables. Forced-entry stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the prediction model, and performance was evaluated using C-statistic, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed by bootstrapping.

          Results

          In total, 310 patients were recruited for this study. 116 patients achieved the outcome. Forced-entry stepwise multivariable logistic regression indicated that PLA2Rab titer (OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001–1.004, p = 0.003), inflammatory cells infiltration (OR = 2.753, 95% CI: 1.468–5.370, p = 0.002) and C3 deposition on immunofluorescence (OR = 0.217, 95% CI: 0.041–0.964, p = 0.049) were the three independent risk factors for treatment failure of PMN. The final prediction model had a C-statistic (95% CI) of 0.653 (0.590–0.717) and a net benefit of 23%-77%.

          Conclusions

          PLA2R antibody, renal interstitial inflammation infiltration, and C3 deposition on immunofluorescence were the three independent risk factors for treatment failure in PMN. Our prediction model might help identify patients at risk of treatment failure; however, the performance awaits improvement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

          Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are routinely used to assess kidney function. Current equations have limited precision and systematically underestimate measured GFR at higher values. To develop a new estimating equation for GFR: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Cross-sectional analysis with separate pooled data sets for equation development and validation and a representative sample of the U.S. population for prevalence estimates. Research studies and clinical populations ("studies") with measured GFR and NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 1999 to 2006. 8254 participants in 10 studies (equation development data set) and 3896 participants in 16 studies (validation data set). Prevalence estimates were based on 16,032 participants in NHANES. GFR, measured as the clearance of exogenous filtration markers (iothalamate in the development data set; iothalamate and other markers in the validation data set), and linear regression to estimate the logarithm of measured GFR from standardized creatinine levels, sex, race, and age. In the validation data set, the CKD-EPI equation performed better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, especially at higher GFR (P < 0.001 for all subsequent comparisons), with less bias (median difference between measured and estimated GFR, 2.5 vs. 5.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), improved precision (interquartile range [IQR] of the differences, 16.6 vs. 18.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), and greater accuracy (percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR, 84.1% vs. 80.6%). In NHANES, the median estimated GFR was 94.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR, 79.7 to 108.1) vs. 85.0 (IQR, 72.9 to 98.5) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease was 11.5% (95% CI, 10.6% to 12.4%) versus 13.1% (CI, 12.1% to 14.0%). The sample contained a limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation is more accurate than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation and could replace it for routine clinical use. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies

            Clinical prediction models combine multiple predictors to estimate risk for the presence of a particular condition (diagnostic models) or the occurrence of a certain event in the future (prognostic models). PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool), a tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROB) and applicability of diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies, was developed by a steering group that considered existing ROB tools and reporting guidelines. The tool was informed by a Delphi procedure involving 38 experts and was refined through piloting. PROBAST is organized into the following 4 domains: participants, predictors, outcome, and analysis. These domains contain a total of 20 signaling questions to facilitate structured judgment of ROB, which was defined to occur when shortcomings in study design, conduct, or analysis lead to systematically distorted estimates of model predictive performance. PROBAST enables a focused and transparent approach to assessing the ROB and applicability of studies that develop, validate, or update prediction models for individualized predictions. Although PROBAST was designed for systematic reviews, it can be used more generally in critical appraisal of prediction model studies. Potential users include organizations supporting decision making, researchers and clinicians who are interested in evidence-based medicine or involved in guideline development, journal editors, and manuscript reviewers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ren Fail
                Ren Fail
                Renal Failure
                Taylor & Francis
                0886-022X
                1525-6049
                5 October 2023
                2023
                5 October 2023
                : 45
                : 2
                : 2265159
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Nephrology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China , Chengdu, China
                [b ]Renal and Metabolic Division, The George Institute for Global Health , Sydney, Australia
                Author notes
                [*]

                These two authors contributed equally to this work

                Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2265159

                CONTACT Yunlin Feng  fengyunlin@ 123456med.uestc.edu.cn  Nephrology Department, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital , Chengdu, 610072 China
                Article
                2265159
                10.1080/0886022X.2023.2265159
                10557540
                37795790
                5c581305-83e4-4613-ae44-034d78798059
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 5104
                Categories
                Research Article
                Clinical Study

                Nephrology
                primary membranous nephropathy,treatment failure,nomogram,prediction model,risk factors
                Nephrology
                primary membranous nephropathy, treatment failure, nomogram, prediction model, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article