12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Traumatic Craniocervical Dissociation in Patients with Congenital Assimilation of the Atlas to the Occiput

      case-report
      , , ,
      Case Reports in Orthopedics
      Hindawi

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Traumatic atlantooccipital dissociation (AOD) is a severe and usually fatal injury. Patients with assimilation of the atlas to the skull are exposed to a higher risk of injury and delay diagnosis due to the abnormal anatomy. We report two cases of acute traumatic craniocervical dislocation in patients with baseline congenital assimilation of the atlas to the skull. Computer tomography (CT) was used to identify the injury. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) showed variations of the vertebral arteries' location on both patients. Assimilation of the atlas was complete in patient one and partial in patient two. Emergent surgical instrumentation and fusion were performed with a very careful and meticulous posterior dissection. As general rule, most of the patients with CCD will undergo occiput to C2 posterior segmental instrumentation and fusion. In the presented cases, a more extensive fusion was necessary based on the type and severity of the CCJ injury and the anatomical anomalies associated. Postoperatively, patient one remained neurologically intact and patient two died. Alternative fixation techniques should be used to minimize risk of VA injury during the surgical procedures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnosis and treatment of craniocervical dislocation in a series of 17 consecutive survivors during an 8-year period.

          Craniocervical dissociation (CCD) is a highly unstable and usually fatal injury resulting from osseoligamentous disruption between the occiput and C-2. The purpose of this study was to elucidate systematic factors associated with delays in diagnosing and treating this life-threatening condition and to introduce an injury-severity classification with therapeutic implications. In a retrospective evaluation of institutional databases, the authors reviewed medical records and original images obtained in 17 consecutive surviving patients with CCD treated between 1994 and 2002. Images and clinical results of treatment were evaluated, emphasizing the timing of diagnosis, clinical effect of delayed diagnosis, potential clinical or imaging warning signs, and response to treatment. Craniocervical dissociation was identified or suspected on the initial lateral cervical spine radiograph acquired in two patients (12%) and was diagnosed based on screening computerized tomography findings in two additional patients (12%). A retrospective review of initial lateral x-ray films showed an abnormal dens-basion interval in 16 patients (94%). The 2-day average delay in diagnosis was associated with profound neurological deterioration in five patients (29%). Neurological status declined in one patient after a fixation procedure was performed. There were no cases of craniocervical pseudarthrosis or hardware failure during a mean 26-month follow-up period. The mean American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score of 50 improved to 79, and the number of patients with useful motor function (ASIA Grade D or E) increased from seven (41%) preoperatively to 13 (76%) postoperatively. The diagnosis of CCD was frequently delayed, and the delay was associated with an increased likelihood of neurological deterioration. Early diagnosis and spinal stabilization protected against worsening spinal cord injury.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The craniocervical junction: embryology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging in blunt trauma

            Abstract Imaging of the blunt traumatic injuries to the craniocervical junction can be challenging but central to improving morbidity and mortality related to such injury. The radiologist has a significant part to play in the appropriate management of patients who have suffered injury to this vital junction between the cranium and the spine. Knowledge of the embryology and normal anatomy as well as normal variant appearances avoids inappropriate investigations in these trauma patients. Osseous injury can be subtle while representing important radiological red flags for significant underlying ligamentous injury. An understanding of bony and ligamentous injury patterns can also give some idea of the biomechanics and degree of force required to inflict such trauma. This will assist greatly in predicting risk for other critical injuries related to vital neighbouring structures such as vasculature, brain stem, cranial nerves and spinal cord. The embryology and anatomy of the craniocervical junction will be outlined in this review and the relevant osseous and ligamentous injuries which can arise as a result of blunt trauma to this site described together. Appropriate secondary radiological imaging considerations related to potential complications of such trauma will also be discussed. Teaching points • The craniocervical junction is a distinct osseo-ligamentous entity with specific functional demands. • Understanding the embryology of the craniocervical junction may prevent erroneous radiological interpretation. • In blunt trauma, the anatomical biomechanical demands of the ligaments warrant consideration. • Dedicated MRI sequences can provide accurate evaluation of ligamentous integrity and injury. • Injury of the craniocervical junction carries risk of blunt traumatic cerebrovascular injury.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anomalous vertebral artery in craniovertebral junction with occipitalization of the atlas.

              STUDY DESIGN.: Observational study with 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography analysis. OBJECTIVE.: To examine the course of the vertebral artery (VA) at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) in individuals with occipitalization of the atlas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: The anatomy of the VA at the CVJ should be completely understood to decrease the risk of iatrogenic injury. Although quantitative anatomic studies have focused on the normal VA, the anomalous VA with occipitalization of the atlas has not been fully explored. METHODS.: A consecutive series of 36 cases with occipitalization of the atlas underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography. Seventy-two vertebral arteries were analyzed. In this setting, the safety of placing lateral mass screws (LMS) was studied. RESULTS.: Four different pathways of the VA at the CVJ with occipitalization of the atlas were found. Type I, wherein the VA enters the spinal canal below the C1 posterior arch, and the course of the VA is below the occipitalized C1 lateral mass (8.3% of 72 vertebral arteries); Type II, the VA enters the spinal canal below the C1 posterior arch, and the course of the VA is on the posterior surface of the occipitalized C1 lateral mass, or makes a curve on it (25%); Type III, wherein the VA ascends externally laterally after leaving the axis transverse foramen, enters an osseous foramen created between the atlas and occipital bone, then into the cranium (61.1%); and Type IV, in which the VA is absent (5.6%). CONCLUSION.: Four types of VA with occipitalization of the atlas are confirmed. Type-I and type-IV VA have relatively low risks for C1 LMS perforation. Type-II and type-III anomalies will probably increase the risk of VA injury during C1 LMS placement. Definite caution should also be taken during the procedure on the contralateral side of a type-IV VA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Case Rep Orthop
                Case Rep Orthop
                CRIOR
                Case Reports in Orthopedics
                Hindawi
                2090-6749
                2090-6757
                2019
                16 December 2019
                : 2019
                : 2617379
                Affiliations
                Department of Orthopaedics & Sport Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104, USA
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Akio Sakamoto

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-4192
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-5774
                Article
                10.1155/2019/2617379
                6942727
                5d58a24d-8c5c-4cf0-8c66-83422a3ee143
                Copyright © 2019 Celeste Tavolaro et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 October 2019
                : 4 December 2019
                Categories
                Case Report

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article