5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Migratory flight imposes oxidative stress in bats

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many animal species migrate over long distances, but the physiological challenges of migration are poorly understood. It has recently been suggested that increased molecular oxidative damage might be one important challenge for migratory animals. We tested the hypothesis that autumn migration imposes an oxidative challenge to bats by comparing values of 4 blood-based markers of oxidative status (oxidative damage and both enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants) between Nathusius’ bats Pipistrellus nathusii that were caught during migration flights with those measured in conspecifics after resting for 18 or 24 h. Experiments were carried out at Pape Ornithological Station in Pape (Latvia) in 2016 and 2017. Our results show that flying bats have a blood oxidative status different from that of resting bats due to higher oxidative damage and different expression of both nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants (glutathione peroxidase). The differences in oxidative status markers varied between sampling years and were independent from individual body condition or sex. Our work provides evidence that migratory flight might impose acute oxidative stress to bats and that resting helps animals to recover from oxidative damage accrued en route. Our data suggest that migrating bats and birds might share similar strategies of mitigating and recovering from oxidative stress.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists?

            The average amount of variance explained by the main factor of interest in ecological and evolutionary studies is an important quantity because it allows evaluation of the general strength of research findings. It also has important implications for the planning of studies. Theoretically we should be able to explain 100% of the variance in data, but randomness and noise may reduce this amount considerably in biological studies. We performed a meta-analysis using data from 43 published meta-analyses in ecology and evolution with 93 estimates of mean effect size using Pearson's r and 136 estimates using Hedges' d or g. This revealed that (depending on the exact analysis) the mean amount of variance (r 2) explained was 2.51-5.42%. The various 95% confidence intervals fell between 1.99 and 7.05%. There was a strongly positive relationship between the fail-safe number (the number of null results needed to nullify an effect) and the coefficient of determination (r 2) or effect size. Analysis at the level of individual tests of null hypotheses showed that the amount of variance key factors explained differed among fields with the largest amount in physiological ecology, lower amounts in ecology and the lowest in evolutionary studies. In all fields though, the hypothesized relationship (e.g. main effect of a fixed treatment) explained little of the variation in the trait of interest. Our finding has important implications for the interpretation of scientific studies. Across studies, the average effect size reported is between Pearson r=0.180 and 0.193 and Hedges' d=0.631 and 0.721. Thus the average sample sizes needed to conclude that a particular relationship is absent with a power of 80% and α=0.05 (two-tailed) are considerably larger than usually recorded in studies of evolution and ecology. For example, to detect r=0.193, the required sample size is 207.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Inflammation and oxidative stress in vertebrate host-parasite systems.

              Innate, inflammation-based immunity is the first line of vertebrate defence against micro-organisms. Inflammation relies on a number of cellular and molecular effectors that can strike invading pathogens very shortly after the encounter between inflammatory cells and the intruder, but in a non-specific way. Owing to this non-specific response, inflammation can generate substantial costs for the host if the inflammatory response, and the associated oxygen-based damage, get out of control. This imposes strong selection pressure that acts to optimize two key features of the inflammatory response: the timing of activation and resolution (the process of downregulation of the response). In this paper, we review the benefits and costs of inflammation-driven immunity. Our aim is to emphasize the importance of resolution of inflammation as a way of maintaining homeostasis against oxidative stress and to prevent the 'horror autotoxicus' of chronic inflammation. Nevertheless, host immune regulation also opens the way to pathogens to subvert host defences. Therefore, quantifying inflammatory costs requires assessing (i) short-term negative effects, (ii) delayed inflammation-driven diseases, and (iii) parasitic strategies to subvert inflammation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Handling Editor
                Journal
                Curr Zool
                Curr Zool
                czoolo
                Current Zoology
                Oxford University Press
                1674-5507
                2396-9814
                April 2019
                31 May 2018
                31 May 2018
                : 65
                : 2
                : 147-153
                Affiliations
                [1 ]UMR 7221 CNRS/MNHN, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 7 rue Cuvier, Paris, France
                [2 ]Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Belgium
                [3 ]Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, Berlin, Germany
                [4 ]Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Takustr. 6, Berlin, Germany
                [5 ]Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, K. Helmaņa 8, Jelgava, LV, Latvia
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to David Costantini. E-mail: david.costantini@ 123456mnhn.fr
                Article
                zoy039
                10.1093/cz/zoy039
                6430974
                30936903
                5d606e50-93e6-4837-9265-1d63c96f6d07
                © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 19 April 2018
                : 15 May 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: Alexander-von-Humboldt-Foundation
                Funded by: Berlin Funding for Graduates
                Funded by: Elsa-Neumann-Stipendium
                Categories
                Articles

                antioxidants,mammals,oxidative damage,stopover,stress
                antioxidants, mammals, oxidative damage, stopover, stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article