2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of Plasma Adenosine as a Marker of Cardiovascular Risk: Analytical and Biological Considerations

      research-article
      , MD 1 , 2 , , BSc 1 , 2 , 1 , , MD 3 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , BSc 3 , , MD 1 , , MD 3 , , MSc 1 , 2 , , MSc 1 , , MSc, MD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , BSc, MD 1 , , MSc, MD 1 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , 2 , , MD, PhD 1 , 2 ,
      Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      adenosine, biomarker, coronary artery disease, high‐performance liquid chromatography, plasma, Biomarkers, Translational Studies, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Revascularization, Coronary Artery Disease

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Adenosine is a ubiquitous regulatory molecule known to modulate signaling in many cells and processes vital to vascular homeostasis. While studies of adenosine receptors have dominated research in the field, quantification of adenosine systemically and locally remains limited owing largely to technical restrictions. Given the potential clinical implications of adenosine biology, there is a need for adequately powered studies examining the role of plasma adenosine in vascular health. We sought to describe the analytical and biological factors that affect quantification of adenosine in humans in a large, real‐world cohort of patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease.

          Methods and Results

          Between November 2016 and April 2018, we assessed 1141 patients undergoing angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease. High‐performance liquid chromatography was used for quantification of plasma adenosine concentration, yielding an analytical coefficient of variance (CV a) of 3.2%, intra‐subject variance (CV i) 35.8% and inter‐subject variance (CV g) 56.7%. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, medications, and clinical presentation had no significant impact on adenosine levels. Conversely, increasing age ( P=0.027) and the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease ( P=0.026) were associated with lower adenosine levels. Adjusted multivariable analysis supported only age being inversely associated with adenosine levels ( P=0.039).

          Conclusions

          Plasma adenosine is not significantly impacted by traditional cardiovascular risk factors; however, advancing age and presence of obstructive coronary artery disease may be associated with lower adenosine levels. The degree of intra‐ and inter‐subject variance of adenosine has important implications for biomarker use as a prognosticator of cardiovascular outcomes and as an end point in clinical studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adenosine receptors as drug targets--what are the challenges?

          Adenosine signalling has long been a target for drug development, with adenosine itself or its derivatives being used clinically since the 1940s. In addition, methylxanthines such as caffeine have profound biological effects as antagonists at adenosine receptors. Moreover, drugs such as dipyridamole and methotrexate act by enhancing the activation of adenosine receptors. There is strong evidence that adenosine has a functional role in many diseases, and several pharmacological compounds specifically targeting individual adenosine receptors--either directly or indirectly--have now entered the clinic. However, only one adenosine receptor-specific agent--the adenosine A2A receptor agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan; Astellas Pharma)--has so far gained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we focus on the biology of adenosine signalling to identify hurdles in the development of additional pharmacological compounds targeting adenosine receptors and discuss strategies to overcome these challenges.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women.

            Few studies have simultaneously investigated the role of soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) receptors types 1 and 2 (sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2), C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 as predictors of cardiovascular events. The value of these inflammatory markers as independent predictors remains controversial. We examined plasma levels of sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein as markers of risk for coronary heart disease among women participating in the Nurses' Health Study and men participating in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study in nested case-control analyses. Among participants who provided a blood sample and who were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, 239 women and 265 men had a nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease during eight years and six years of follow-up, respectively. Using risk-set sampling, we selected controls in a 2:1 ratio with matching for age, smoking status, and date of blood sampling. After adjustment for matching factors, high levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein were significantly related to an increased risk of coronary heart disease in both sexes, whereas high levels of soluble TNF-alpha receptors were significant only among women. Further adjustment for lipid and nonlipid factors attenuated all associations; only C-reactive protein levels remained significant. The relative risk among all participants was 1.79 for those with C-reactive protein levels of at least 3.0 mg per liter, as compared with those with levels of less than 1.0 mg per liter (95 percent confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.51; P for trend <0.001). Additional adjustment for the presence or absence of diabetes and hypertension moderately attenuated the relative risk to 1.68 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.18 to 2.38; P for trend = 0.008). Elevated levels of inflammatory markers, particularly C-reactive protein, indicate an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Although plasma lipid levels were more strongly associated with an increased risk than were inflammatory markers, the level of C-reactive protein remained a significant contributor to the prediction of coronary heart disease. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry.

              Most clinical chemical analytes vary in a random manner around a homeostatic set point. Replicate analyses of a series of specimens collected from a group of subjects allows estimation of analytical, within and between subject components of variation. The preferred experimental procedures and statistical methods for evaluation of data and analysis of variance are described; a detailed example is provided in the Appendix. The many uses of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry are reviewed, including setting analytical goals, deciding the significance of changes in serial results from an individual, evaluating the utility of conventional population-based reference values in patient management, and other applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bhibbert@ottawaheart.ca
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                05 August 2019
                06 August 2019
                : 8
                : 15 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.2019.8.issue-15 )
                : e012228
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] CAPITAL Research Group Division of Cardiology University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Canada
                [ 2 ] Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine University of Ottawa Canada
                [ 3 ] Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Benjamin Hibbert, MD, PhD, FRCPC, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Room H4238, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7. E‐mail: bhibbert@ 123456ottawaheart.ca
                [†]

                Dr Simard and Dr Jung contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                JAH34259
                10.1161/JAHA.119.012228
                6761640
                31379241
                5df699a5-db58-4233-9190-e73fda8d0100
                © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 30 January 2019
                : 24 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 11, Words: 8894
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Ottawa Heart Institute – Academic Medical Organization – Innovations Funding
                Funded by: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
                Funded by: Tier 1 University of Ottawa Chair in Cardiovascular Research
                Funded by: Vered Chair in Cardiology
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Interventional Cardiology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jah34259
                06 August 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.7 mode:remove_FC converted:06.08.2019

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                adenosine,biomarker,coronary artery disease,high‐performance liquid chromatography,plasma,biomarkers,translational studies,percutaneous coronary intervention,revascularization

                Comments

                Comment on this article