Abaloparatide Improves Rotator Cuff Healing via Anabolic Effects on Bone Remodeling in a Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear Model of Rat With Osteoporosis: A Comparison With Denosumab

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background:

Because of poor clinical outcomes, rotator cuff healing in patients with osteoporosis has recently gained attention. Antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis has been reported to improve healing after repair. However, the comparative effectiveness of anabolic and antiresorptive agents has not been investigated.

Hypothesis:

Anabolic therapy with abaloparatide (ABL) would outperform antiresorptive therapy with denosumab (Dmab) to improve rotator cuff healing in the osteoporotic status.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A chronic rotator cuff tear model was established in ovariectomy-induced postmenopausal osteoporotic rats. Then, bilateral rotator cuff repairs were conducted in all experimental rats, which were randomly divided into control (CON), Dmab, and ABL groups to receive the corresponding subcutaneous injections. The rats sacrificed at 2 weeks (the early healing period) were used to detect osteoblast and osteoclast activities, related gene expression (osteoclastogenesis, osteogenesis, and chondrogenesis), new bone formation, and mineralization. In the rats sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks, the bone mineral density and bone architecture at the repaired site were assessed by micro–computed tomography, and rotator cuff healing was evaluated using histological and biomechanical analyses.

Results:

At 8 weeks, significantly higher failure load and stiffness were observed in the ABL (25.13 ± 3.54 N, P < .001; 21.65 ± 3.08 N/mm, P < .001; respectively), and Dmab (21.21 ± 2.55 N, P < .001; 16.15 ± 2.07 N/mm, P = .008; respectively) groups than in the CON group (13.36 ± 1.70 N; 11.20 ± 2.59 N/mm; respectively), whereas the ABL treatment provided better failure load and stiffness than Dmab ( P = .019; P = .003). Although tendon-to-bone healing was improved by Dmab, the most mature tendon insertion at the interface was observed in the ABL group, including a more organized collagen and fibrocartilage and higher bone quality. ABL significantly promoted bone remodeling via coupling between osteoclasts and osteoblasts (osteoblast to osteoclast ratio: 4.80 ± 0.39; P = .022), thereby stimulating more new bone formation and mineralization at the tendon-to-bone healing interface than Dmab (osteoblast to osteoclast ratio: 3.21 ± 0.75) at 2 weeks. Moreover, ABL had significant effects on gene expression [Runt-realted transcription factor 2 ( Runx2, collagen type I-alpha 1 ( Col1A1]), and sclerostin for osteogenesis; aggrecan and collagen type II ( Col2) for chondrogenesis] in mineralized tissues, indicative of enhanced bone and fibrocartilage formation when compared with the CON and Dmab groups.

Conclusion:

ABL promoted rotator cuff healing in osteoporotic rats by significantly increasing the mineralized tissue quality and collagen maturity at the reattachment site, leading to improved biomechanical properties, and was superior to Dmab in both biomechanical and histological analyses.

Clinical Relevance:

Anabolic therapy with ABL may outperform antiresorptive therapy with Dmab in improving outcomes after rotator cuff repair in osteoporotic patients.

Related collections

Most cited references 53

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

National trends in rotator cuff repair.

Alexis Chiang Colvin, Natalia Egorova, Alicia Harrison … (2012)

Recent publications suggest that arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repairs have had comparable clinical results, although each technique has distinct advantages and disadvantages. National hospital and ambulatory surgery databases were reviewed to identify practice patterns for rotator cuff repair. The rates of medical visits for rotator cuff pathology, and the rates of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were examined for the years 1996 and 2006 in the United States. The national incidence of rotator cuff repairs and related data were obtained from inpatient (National Hospital Discharge Survey, NHDS) and ambulatory surgery (National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery, NSAS) databases. These databases were queried with use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes for arthroscopic (ICD-9 codes 83.63 and 80.21) and open (code 83.63 without code 80.21) rotator cuff repair. We also examined where the surgery was performed (inpatient versus ambulatory surgery center) and characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, and comorbidities. The unadjusted volume of all rotator cuff repairs increased 141% in the decade from 1996 to 2006. The unadjusted number of arthroscopic procedures increased by 600% while open repairs increased by only 34% during this time interval. There was a significant shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery (p < 0.001). The increase in national rates of rotator cuff repair over the last decade has been dramatic, particularly for arthroscopic assisted repair.

0 comments Cited 195 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Osteoclasts Provide Coupling Signals to Osteoblast Lineage Cells Through Multiple Mechanisms

Natalie Sims, T John Martin (2020)

Bone remodeling is essential for the repair and replacement of damaged and old bone. The major principle underlying this process is that osteoclast-mediated resorption of a quantum of bone is followed by osteoblast precursor recruitment; these cells differentiate to matrix-producing osteoblasts, which form new bone to replace what was resorbed. Evidence from osteopetrotic syndromes indicate that osteoclasts not only resorb bone, but also provide signals to promote bone formation. Osteoclasts act upon osteoblast lineage cells throughout their differentiation by facilitating growth factor release from resorbed matrix, producing secreted proteins and microvesicles, and expressing membrane-bound factors. These multiple mechanisms mediate the coupling of bone formation to resorption in remodeling. Additional interactions of osteoclasts with osteoblast lineage cells, including interactions with canopy and reversal cells, are required to achieve coordination between bone formation and resorption during bone remodeling.

0 comments Cited 100 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Bone modeling and remodeling: potential as therapeutic targets for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Bente Lomholt Langdahl, Serge Ferrari, David Dempster (2016)

The adult skeleton is renewed by remodeling throughout life. Bone remodeling is a process where osteoclasts and osteoblasts work sequentially in the same bone remodeling unit. After the attainment of peak bone mass, bone remodeling is balanced and bone mass is stable for one or two decades until age-related bone loss begins. Age-related bone loss is caused by increases in resorptive activity and reduced bone formation. The relative importance of cortical remodeling increases with age as cancellous bone is lost and remodeling activity in both compartments increases. Bone modeling describes the process whereby bones are shaped or reshaped by the independent action of osteoblast and osteoclasts. The activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are not necessarily coupled anatomically or temporally. Bone modeling defines skeletal development and growth but continues throughout life. Modeling-based bone formation contributes to the periosteal expansion, just as remodeling-based resorption is responsible for the medullary expansion seen at the long bones with aging. Existing and upcoming treatments affect remodeling as well as modeling. Teriparatide stimulates bone formation, 70% of which is remodeling based and 20-30% is modeling based. The vast majority of modeling represents overflow from remodeling units rather than de novo modeling. Denosumab inhibits bone remodeling but is permissive for modeling at cortex. Odanacatib inhibits bone resorption by inhibiting cathepsin K activity, whereas modeling-based bone formation is stimulated at periosteal surfaces. Inhibition of sclerostin stimulates bone formation and histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that bone formation is predominantly modeling based. The bone-mass response to some osteoporosis treatments in humans certainly suggests that nonremodeling mechanisms contribute to this response and bone modeling may be such a mechanism. To date, this has only been demonstrated for teriparatide, however, it is clear that rediscovering a phenomenon that was first observed more half a century ago will have an important impact on our understanding of how new antifracture treatments work.