Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex as predictor for achieved health outcomes and received care in ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage: a register-based study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Differences in stroke care and health outcomes between men and women are debated. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between patients’ sex and post-stroke health outcomes and received care in a Swedish setting.

          Methods

          Patients with a registered diagnosis of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or ischemic stroke (IS) within regional administrative systems (ICD-10 codes I61* or I63*) and the Swedish Stroke Register during 2010–2011 were included and followed for 1 year. Data linkage to multiple other data sources on individual level was performed. Adjustments were performed for age, socioeconomic factors, living arrangements, ADL dependency, and stroke severity in multivariate regression analyses of health outcomes and received care. Health outcomes (e.g., survival, functioning, satisfaction) and received care measures (regional and municipal resources and processes) were studied.

          Results

          Study population: 13,775 women and 13,916 men. After case-mix adjustments for the above factors, we found women to have higher 1-year survival rates after both IS (OR female = 1.17, p < 0.001) and ICH (OR female = 1.65, p < 0.001). Initial inpatient stay at hospital was, however, shorter for women ( β female, IS = − 0.05, p < 0.001; β female, ICH = − 0.08, p < 0.005). For IS, good function (mRS ≤ 2) was more common in men (OR female = 0.86, p < 0.001) who also received more inpatient care during the first year ( β female = − 0.05, p < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          A lower proportion of women had good functioning, a difference that remained in IS after adjustments for age, socioeconomic factors, living arrangements, ADL dependency, and stroke severity. The amount of received hospital care was lower for women after adjustments. Whether shorter hospital stay results in lower function or is a consequence of lower function cannot be elucidated. One-year survival was higher in men when no adjustments were made but lower after adjustments. This likely reflects that women were older at time of stroke, had more severe strokes, and more disability pre-stroke—factors that make a direct comparison between the sexes intricate.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0170-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes.

          Stroke has a greater effect on women than men because women have more events and are less likely to recover. Age-specific stroke rates are higher in men, but, because of their longer life expectancy and much higher incidence at older ages, women have more stroke events than men. With the exception of subarachnoid haemorrhage, there is little evidence of sex differences in stroke subtype or severity. Although several reports found that women are less likely to receive some in-hospital interventions, most differences disappear after age and comorbidities are accounted for. However, sex disparities persist in the use of thrombolytic treatment (with alteplase) and lipid testing. Functional outcomes and quality of life after stroke are consistently poorer in women, despite adjustment for baseline differences in age, prestroke function, and comorbidities. Here, we comprehensively review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes of stroke in women.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review.

            Epidemiological studies, mainly based on Western European surveys, have shown that stroke is more common in men than in women. In recent years, sex-specific data on stroke incidence, prevalence, subtypes, severity and case-fatality have become available from other parts of the world. The purpose of this article is to give a worldwide review on sex differences in stroke epidemiology. We searched PubMed, tables-of-contents, review articles, and reference lists for community-based studies including information on sex differences. In some areas, such as secular trends, ischemic subtypes and stroke severity, noncommunity-based studies were also reviewed. Male/female ratios were calculated. We found 98 articles that contained relevant sex-specific information, including 59 incidence studies from 19 countries and 5 continents. The mean age at first-ever stroke was 68.6 years among men, and 72.9 years among women. Male stroke incidence rate was 33% higher and stroke prevalence was 41% higher than the female, with large variations between age bands and between populations. The incidence rates of brain infarction and intracerebral hemorrhage were higher among men, whereas the rate of subarachnoidal hemorrhage was higher among women, although this difference was not statistically significant. Stroke tended to be more severe in women, with a 1-month case fatality of 24.7% compared with 19.7% for men. Worldwide, stroke is more common among men, but women are more severely ill. The mismatch between the sexes is larger than previously described.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defining equity in health.

              To propose a definition of health equity to guide operationalisation and measurement, and to discuss the practical importance of clarity in defining this concept. Conceptual discussion. Setting, Patients/Participants, and Main results: not applicable. For the purposes of measurement and operationalisation, equity in health is the absence of systematic disparities in health (or in the major social determinants of health) between groups with different levels of underlying social advantage/disadvantage-that is, wealth, power, or prestige. Inequities in health systematically put groups of people who are already socially disadvantaged (for example, by virtue of being poor, female, and/or members of a disenfranchised racial, ethnic, or religious group) at further disadvantage with respect to their health; health is essential to wellbeing and to overcoming other effects of social disadvantage. Equity is an ethical principle; it also is consonant with and closely related to human rights principles. The proposed definition of equity supports operationalisation of the right to the highest attainable standard of health as indicated by the health status of the most socially advantaged group. Assessing health equity requires comparing health and its social determinants between more and less advantaged social groups. These comparisons are essential to assess whether national and international policies are leading toward or away from greater social justice in health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +46709964353 , carl.willers@ki.se
                ingrid.lekander@ki.se
                elisabeth.ekstrand@skane.se
                mikael.lilja@regionjh.se
                helene.pessah@skane.se
                katharina.sunnerhagen@neuro.gu.se
                mia.von.euler@ki.se
                Journal
                Biol Sex Differ
                Biol Sex Differ
                Biology of Sex Differences
                BioMed Central (London )
                2042-6410
                7 March 2018
                7 March 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 61 Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Karolinska Institutet Stroke Research Network at Södersjukhuset, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Ivbar Institute AB, Stockholm, Sweden
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Medical Management Centre, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0930 2361, GRID grid.4514.4, Department of Health Sciences, , Lund University, ; Lund, Sweden
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, GRID grid.12650.30, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Research, Education and Development, Östersund, , Umeå University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                [7 ]GRID grid.411843.b, Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, , Skåne University Hospital, ; Lund, Sweden
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0930 2361, GRID grid.4514.4, Department of Clinical Sciences, , Lund University, ; Lund, Sweden
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, GRID grid.8761.8, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Rehabilitation Medicine, , University of Gothenburg, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Center for Gender Medicine, Department of Medicine Solna, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-9238
                Article
                170
                10.1186/s13293-018-0170-1
                5842547
                29514685
                6358e17c-33a4-4fa4-a8ca-c350fde7a4ab
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 September 2017
                : 20 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004348, Stockholms Läns Landsting;
                Award ID: LS 2015-0630
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Human biology
                stroke,sex,health outcomes,resources,utilization,epidemiology
                Human biology
                stroke, sex, health outcomes, resources, utilization, epidemiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article