21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Using Multiplexed Assays of Oncogenic Drivers in Lung Cancers to Select Targeted Drugs

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Targeting oncogenic drivers (genomic alterations critical to cancer development and maintenance) has transformed the care of patients with lung adenocarcinomas. The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium was formed to perform multiplexed assays testing adenocarcinomas of the lung for drivers in 10 genes to enable clinicians to select targeted treatments and enroll patients into clinical trials. To determine the frequency of oncogenic drivers in patients with lung adenocarcinomas and to use the data to select treatments targeting the identified driver(s) and measure survival. From 2009 through 2012, 14 sites in the United States enrolled patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and a performance status of 0 through 2 and tested their tumors for 10 drivers. Information was collected on patients, therapies, and survival. Tumors were tested for 10 oncogenic drivers, and results were used to select matched targeted therapies. Determination of the frequency of oncogenic drivers, the proportion of patients treated with genotype-directed therapy, and survival. From 2009 through 2012, tumors from 1007 patients were tested for at least 1 gene and 733 for 10 genes (patients with full genotyping). An oncogenic driver was found in 466 of 733 patients (64%). Among these 733 tumors, 182 tumors (25%) had the KRAS driver; sensitizing EGFR, 122 (17%); ALK rearrangements, 57 (8%); other EGFR, 29 (4%); 2 or more genes, 24 (3%); ERBB2 (formerly HER2), 19 (3%); BRAF, 16 (2%); PIK3CA, 6 (<1%); MET amplification, 5 (<1%); NRAS, 5 (<1%); MEK1, 1 (<1%); AKT1, 0. Results were used to select a targeted therapy or trial in 275 of 1007 patients (28%). The median survival was 3.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.96-7.70) for the 260 patients with an oncogenic driver and genotype-directed therapy compared with 2.4 years (IQR, 0.88-6.20) for the 318 patients with any oncogenic driver(s) who did not receive genotype-directed therapy (propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.9], P = .006). Actionable drivers were detected in 64% of lung adenocarcinomas. Multiplexed testing aided physicians in selecting therapies. Although individuals with drivers receiving a matched targeted agent lived longer, randomized trials are required to determine if targeting therapy based on oncogenic drivers improves survival. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01014286.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA
          JAMA
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          0098-7484
          May 21 2014
          May 21 2014
          : 311
          : 19
          : 1998
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
          [2 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
          [3 ]Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
          [4 ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
          [5 ]Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
          [6 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
          [7 ]University of Colorado Cancer Center Denver, Aurora
          [8 ]The Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
          [9 ]Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
          [10 ]David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
          [11 ]The John Hopkins University, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
          [12 ]University of Texas Southwestern, Medical Center, Dallas
          [13 ]H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
          [14 ]University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
          [15 ]Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
          [16 ]National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland17Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
          Article
          10.1001/jama.2014.3741
          4163053
          24846037
          64c8843f-7284-42cf-9106-a2a38d25c224
          © 2014
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article