38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    1
    shares

      More than a publisher.
      1949-1924

      Subscribe to our anniversary newsletter to learn more about the Hogrefe Group throughout the year – and be automatically entered for a chance to win prizes every month: SUBSCRIBE NOW

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Development and Validity of the Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire (PSSQ) : A New Tool to Assess Stigmatization Among Those Who Are Suicidal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Background: The detrimental consequences of stigma have been recognized in extensive research on mental illness stigma, but experiences of suicide-related stigmatization have not received sufficient research attention. The lack of a simple self-report assessment of personal suicide-related stigma led to the work reported here. Aim: To develop and assess the validity of the Personal Suicide Stigma Questionnaire (PSSQ). Method: The item pool for PSSQ was based on qualitative data and was tested in a community sample of 224 adults (mean age = 32.68 years, 83% female, 92.9% Caucasian) who reported lifetime suicidality. Factor analysis was used for item selection. The Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale – Short form (SSMIS-SF) and Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire – Revised (SBQ-R) were used to assess validity of the scale. Results: Following analysis, 16 items, forming three highly interrelated factors (Rejection, Minimization, and Self-blame), were selected for the PSSQ. The PSSQ scores showed predicted relationships with mental illness stigma and suicidality, suggesting its validity. Limitations: The validity of the scale still requires further research in clinical populations. Conclusion: The newly developed PSSQ can be used to assess the levels of suicide-related stigma experiences of suicidal individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We’ll Take It From Here.

          Empirical studies in psychology commonly report Cronbach's alpha as a measure of internal consistency reliability despite the fact that many methodological studies have shown that Cronbach's alpha is riddled with problems stemming from unrealistic assumptions. In many circumstances, violating these assumptions yields estimates of reliability that are too small, making measures look less reliable than they actually are. Although methodological critiques of Cronbach's alpha are being cited with increasing frequency in empirical studies, in this tutorial we discuss how the trend is not necessarily improving methodology used in the literature. That is, many studies continue to use Cronbach's alpha without regard for its assumptions or merely cite methodological articles advising against its use to rationalize unfavorable Cronbach's alpha estimates. This tutorial first provides evidence that recommendations against Cronbach's alpha have not appreciably changed how empirical studies report reliability. Then, we summarize the drawbacks of Cronbach's alpha conceptually without relying on mathematical or simulation-based arguments so that these arguments are accessible to a broad audience. We continue by discussing several alternative measures that make less rigid assumptions which provide justifiably higher estimates of reliability compared to Cronbach's alpha. We conclude with empirical examples to illustrate advantages of alternative measures of reliability including omega total, Revelle's omega total, the greatest lower bound, and Coefficient H. A detailed software appendix is also provided to help researchers implement alternative methods. (PsycINFO Database Record
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Modified Labeling Theory Approach to Mental Disorders: An Empirical Assessment

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The gender paradox in suicidal behavior and its impact on the suicidal process.

              An important gender difference has been reported regarding suicidal behavior with an overrepresentation of females in nonfatal suicidal behavior and a preponderance of males in completed suicide, also known as the 'gender paradox of suicidal behavior'. The concept of a 'suicidal process' classifies suicidal behavior chronologically; this process starts with suicidal ideation and then implies a progression of suicidality ranging from suicidal ideation over plans to suicide attempts and finally fatal suicide. The current paper aims to deepen the knowledge on the gender paradox by collecting and discussing the recent literature on this topic: the most relevant, impacting gender-related factors will be discussed within the suicidal process concept. Several factors had a gender-dependent impact on suicidal behavior: psychosocial life stressors such as stressful life events but also sociodemographical or socio-economical factors, and sexual abuse. The gender differences in psychiatric (co)morbidity and in response to or attitude towards antidepressant treatment also appear to have an impact. Furthermore, not only suicide methods but also the gender-dependent variation in reporting suicide has an influence. Finally, the gender differences in help seeking behavior as well as region-dependent cultural beliefs and societal attitudes are discussed. Especially life-events seem to exert an important influence at the beginning of a suicidal process, whereas the other factors occur at a further stage in the process, however without a fixed chronology. Also, the duration of the suicidal process is much shorter in male than in females. Finally, some implications with regard to clinical practice and suicide prevention are suggested. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                cri
                Crisis
                Hogrefe Publishing
                0227-5910
                2151-2396
                January 15, 2019
                2019
                : 40
                : 5
                : 317-325
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Mt. Gravatt, QLD, Australia
                [ 2 ]Suicidology Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Lithuania
                Author notes
                Jurgita Rimkeviciene, Suicidology Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania, jurgita.rimkeviciene@ 123456fsf.vu.lt
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-8214
                Article
                cri_40_5_317
                10.1027/0227-5910/a000567
                6701f9e5-dd4d-449a-99d4-69bcd75b909a
                Copyright @ 2019
                History
                : July 18, 2017
                : June 23, 2018
                : June 26, 2018
                Categories
                Research Trends

                Emergency medicine & Trauma,Psychology,Health & Social care,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
                attitudes,suicide attempts,discrimination,stigmatization,self-stigma

                Comments

                Comment on this article