Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reasons Why Athletes Do Not Return to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Comparative Study of 208 Athletes With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          There is a lack of information regarding the reasons why patients do not return to sports after an arthroscopic Bankart repair and whether there is a relationship between return to sports and functional outcomes.

          Purpose:

          To evaluate the reasons why competitive athletes who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair did not return to sports and whether there was a relationship between returning to sports and postoperative outcome scores and complications.

          Study Design:

          Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

          Methods:

          Of 217 competitive athletes who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for isolated anterior glenohumeral instability between June 2014 and December 2017, a total of 208 athletes (96%) were evaluated at minimum 2-year follow-up. Return to sports, the level of sports achieved, and the time between surgery and return to competition were assessed, and patients who did not return to sports were asked to provide the reasons for cessation. The Rowe score and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated.

          Results:

          The mean patient age was 24 years (range, 18-30 years), and the mean follow-up was 44 months (range, 24-90 months). Of the 208 athletes, 73% were able to return to sports (65% returned to their preinjury level), and 27% did not return to sports. Of those who did not return, the most frequent reasons were fear of reinjury (44%), lack of confidence in their shoulder (12%), and concern about a new rehabilitation process in case of recurrence (10%). The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed significant postoperative improvement in all patients ( P < .001), with no significant differences between the 2 study groups at the final follow-up. There were 21 recurrences (10%) and 5 complications (2.4%), and 11 patients (5.3%) underwent revision surgery, with no significant differences in these rates between the groups.

          Conclusion:

          Of patients who did not return to sports, 74% left for a reason independent of shoulder function, with the most frequent causes being fear of reinjury and a concern about new rehabilitation process. Neither outcome scores nor complications varied significantly between patients who returned and those who did not return to sports.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.

          Of 161 patients with 162 shoulders operated on during a thirty-year period (1946 to 1976), 124 were re-examined and twenty-one answered a questionnaire. The lesions found at surgery were separation of the capsule from the anterior glenoid rim in 85 per cent, a Hill-Sachs lesion of the humeral head in 77 per cent, and damage to the anterior glenoid rim (including fracture) in 73 per cent. There were five recurrences (3.5 per cent) after repair by the method described in the 145 shoulders that were followed. Only one of the forty-six patients with dislocation on the dominant side and one of the thirty-one with dislocation on the non-dominant side failed to return to the competitive athletic activities in which they participated prior to injury. The results at follow-up were rated excellent in 74 per cent, good in 23 per cent, and poor in 3 per cent. Ninety-eight per cent of the patients rated their result as excellent or good. Sixty-nine per cent of the shoulders had a full range of motion, and only 2 per cent of these shoulders redislocated. A fracture of the rim of the glenoid did not increase the risk of recurrence, while a moderate to severe Hill-Sachs lesion increased the risk only slightly. We concluded that with the meticulous technique of the Bankart repair as described, postoperative immobilization is not necessary, early return of motion and function can be expected, and resumption of athletic activities with no limitation of shoulder motion is possible for most patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury.

            Psychological factors have been shown to be associated with the recovery and rehabilitation period following sports injury, but less is known about the psychological response associated with returning to sport after injury. The aim of this review was to identify psychological factors associated with returning to sport following sports injury evaluated with the self-determination theory framework.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder.

              We performed ninety-five consecutive Latarjet procedures for the treatment of recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder between 1969 and 1983. In 1993, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic results that were available for fifty-six patients (fifty-eight shoulders) who had been followed for an average of 143 years (range, ten to twenty-three years). The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of glenohumeral osteoarthrosis and the factors related to its development after the Latarjet procedure. The procedure was performed for the treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation in fifty shoulders and painful recurrent anterior subluxation in eight. All patients had a radiographic evaluation (three anteroposterior radiographs, with the humerus in external, neutral, and internal rotation, and one lateral radiograph) before the operation and at the latest follow-up examination. At the time of the latest follow-up, none of the patients had recurrent dislocation, six patients had apprehension with regard to possible dislocation, and one had occasional subluxation. According to the system of Rowe et al., fifty-one (88 per cent) of the fifty-eight shoulders had an excellent or good result; five (9 per cent), a fair result; and two (3 per cent), a poor result. Twenty-two shoulders had no glenohumeral osteoarthrosis. Thirty-four shoulders had centered glenohumeral osteoarthrosis (the humeral head remained in front of the center of the glenoid cavity), which was grade 1 in twenty-five shoulders, grade 2 in four, grade 3 in three, and grade 4 in two, and two shoulders had grade-4 eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthrosis (the humeral head was more proximal than normal in relation to the center of the glenoid cavity). Postoperative grade-1 glenohumeral osteoarthrosis, unlike the higher grades, had no effect on the function of the shoulder.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthop J Sports Med
                Orthop J Sports Med
                OJS
                spojs
                Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2325-9671
                21 July 2021
                July 2021
                : 9
                : 7
                : 23259671211013394
                Affiliations
                []Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                [2-23259671211013394] Investigation performed at the Shoulder Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Luciano Andrés Rossi, MD, PhD, Peron 4190 (C1199ABB) Buenos Aires, Argentina (email: luciano.rossi@ 123456hospitalitaliano.org.ar ).
                Article
                10.1177_23259671211013394
                10.1177/23259671211013394
                8299894
                34368378
                68f6cc58-493a-4263-a0fa-1ed19c019397
                © The Author(s) 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 19 December 2020
                : 21 January 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ts3

                glenohumeral instability,return to sports,bankart,athletes

                Comments

                Comment on this article