8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Chinese Version of the Caring Dimensions Inventory: Reliability and Validity Assessment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Caring is central to nursing practice. Chinese nurses take care for the health of about 20% of the world’s population and their perception of caring is critical. However, until recently, instrument specifically designed to measure the caring of nurses in China was not found. Caring dimensions inventory (CDI) is one of the most frequently used instrument when measuring caring and is applicable to nurses from different cultures. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the 25-item CDI. The English version of CDI was translated into Chinese according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization. Content validity was conducted among seven senior nurses from different institutions in different cities in China. A convenience sample of nurses from 11 cities in China was employed. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of the CDI was carried out using a sample of 880 nurses. The overall content validity index was 0.98. Three factors (Nurturance, Collaboration, Skill) were identified in exploratory factor analysis and were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The three-factor solution explains 70.15% of the total variance. The Cronbach alpha for overall the CDI was 0.97. This study demonstrated that the Chinese version of the CDI showed satisfactory reliability and validity, indicating that it could be a useful measurement to assess nurses’ perception of caring in China.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Psychometric Theory.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

              Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                25 June 2021
                July 2021
                : 18
                : 13
                : 6834
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Research Management and Development Department, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau 999078, China; chingco@ 123456kwnc.edu.mo
                [2 ]Education Department, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau 999078, China; zmx@ 123456kwnc.edu.mo (M.-X.Z.); sichen@ 123456kwnc.edu.mo (S.-C.W.); joecheong@ 123456kwnc.edu.mo (P.-L.C.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: van@ 123456kwnc.edu.mo ; Tel.: +853-8295-6202
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-0497
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8525-9692
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-0778
                Article
                ijerph-18-06834
                10.3390/ijerph18136834
                8297071
                34202158
                6aaeae74-b2bc-4e9e-b76a-209a8c0049b1
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 08 June 2021
                : 23 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                caring dimensions inventory,reliability,validity,nurse,china
                Public health
                caring dimensions inventory, reliability, validity, nurse, china

                Comments

                Comment on this article