Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Perceiving social interactions in the posterior superior temporal sulcus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Humans spend a large percentage of their time perceiving the appearance, actions, and intentions of others, and extensive previous research has identified multiple brain regions engaged in these functions. However, social life depends on the ability to understand not just individuals, but also groups and their interactions. Here we show that a specific region of the posterior superior temporal sulcus responds strongly and selectively when viewing social interactions between two other agents. This region also contains information about whether the interaction is positive (helping) or negative (hindering), and may underlie our ability to perceive, understand, and navigate within our social world.

          Abstract

          Primates are highly attuned not just to social characteristics of individual agents, but also to social interactions between multiple agents. Here we report a neural correlate of the representation of social interactions in the human brain. Specifically, we observe a strong univariate response in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) to stimuli depicting social interactions between two agents, compared with ( i) pairs of agents not interacting with each other, ( ii) physical interactions between inanimate objects, and ( iii) individual animate agents pursuing goals and interacting with inanimate objects. We further show that this region contains information about the nature of the social interaction—specifically, whether one agent is helping or hindering the other. This sensitivity to social interactions is strongest in a specific subregion of the pSTS but extends to a lesser extent into nearby regions previously implicated in theory of mind and dynamic face perception. This sensitivity to the presence and nature of social interactions is not easily explainable in terms of low-level visual features, attention, or the animacy, actions, or goals of individual agents. This region may underlie our ability to understand the structure of our social world and navigate within it.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Human cooperation.

          Why should you help a competitor? Why should you contribute to the public good if free riders reap the benefits of your generosity? Cooperation in a competitive world is a conundrum. Natural selection opposes the evolution of cooperation unless specific mechanisms are at work. Five such mechanisms have been proposed: direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, spatial selection, multilevel selection, and kin selection. Here we discuss empirical evidence from laboratory experiments and field studies of human interactions for each mechanism. We also consider cooperation in one-shot, anonymous interactions for which no mechanisms are apparent. We argue that this behavior reflects the overgeneralization of cooperative strategies learned in the context of direct and indirect reciprocity: we show that automatic, intuitive responses favor cooperative strategies that reciprocate. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Social evaluation by preverbal infants.

            The capacity to evaluate other people is essential for navigating the social world. Humans must be able to assess the actions and intentions of the people around them, and make accurate decisions about who is friend and who is foe, who is an appropriate social partner and who is not. Indeed, all social animals benefit from the capacity to identify individual conspecifics that may help them, and to distinguish these individuals from others that may harm them. Human adults evaluate people rapidly and automatically on the basis of both behaviour and physical features, but the ontogenetic origins and development of this capacity are not well understood. Here we show that 6- and 10-month-old infants take into account an individual's actions towards others in evaluating that individual as appealing or aversive: infants prefer an individual who helps another to one who hinders another, prefer a helping individual to a neutral individual, and prefer a neutral individual to a hindering individual. These findings constitute evidence that preverbal infants assess individuals on the basis of their behaviour towards others. This capacity may serve as the foundation for moral thought and action, and its early developmental emergence supports the view that social evaluation is a biological adaptation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              People thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                24 October 2017
                9 October 2017
                : 114
                : 43
                : E9145-E9152
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA 02139;
                [2] bMcGovern Institute of Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA 02139;
                [3] cSchool of Psychology, Bangor University , Bangor LL57 2DG, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: lisik@ 123456mit.edu or ngk@ 123456mit.edu .

                Contributed by Nancy Kanwisher, September 14, 2017 (sent for review August 16, 2017; reviewed by Alex Martin and Kevin Pelphrey)

                Author contributions: L.I., K.K., and N.K. designed research; L.I., D.B., and N.K. performed research; L.I. analyzed data; and L.I. and N.K. wrote the paper.

                Reviewers: A.M., National Institute of Mental Health; and K.P., George Washington University.

                1L.I. and K.K. contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PMC5664556 PMC5664556 5664556 201714471
                10.1073/pnas.1714471114
                5664556
                29073111
                6d7beb3f-8277-4e0a-8052-c76c3b98d6dd
                Published under the PNAS license.
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) 100000001
                Award ID: CCF-1231216
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: Director's Pioneer Award
                Funded by: DOD | United States Navy | ONR | Office of Naval Research Global (ONRG) 100007297
                Award ID: Understanding Scenes and Events through Joint Parsing
                Award ID: Cognitive Reasoning and Lifelong Learning
                Categories
                PNAS Plus
                Biological Sciences
                Neuroscience
                PNAS Plus

                social brain,social perception,social interaction,superior temporal sulcus,fMRI

                Comments

                Comment on this article