32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Repeat prenatal corticosteroid prior to preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis for the PRECISE study group (prenatal repeat corticosteroid international IPD study group: assessing the effects using the best level of evidence) - study protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is to assess whether the effects of repeat prenatal corticosteroid treatment given to women at risk of preterm birth to benefit their babies are modified in a clinically meaningful way by factors related to the women or the trial protocol.

          Methods/Design

          The Prenatal Repeat Corticosteroid International IPD Study Group: assessing the effects using the best level of Evidence (PRECISE) Group will conduct an IPD meta-analysis. The PRECISE International Collaborative Group was formed in 2010 and data collection commenced in 2011. Eleven trials with up to 5,000 women and 6,000 infants are eligible for the PRECISE IPD meta-analysis. The primary study outcomes for the infants will be serious neonatal outcome (defined by the PRECISE International IPD Study Group as one of death (foetal, neonatal or infant); severe respiratory disease; severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 and 4); chronic lung disease; necrotising enterocolitis; serious retinopathy of prematurity; and cystic periventricular leukomalacia); use of respiratory support (defined as mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airways pressure or other respiratory support); and birth weight (Z-scores). For the children, the primary study outcomes will be death or any neurological disability (however defined by trialists at childhood follow up and may include developmental delay or intellectual impairment (developmental quotient or intelligence quotient more than one standard deviation below the mean), cerebral palsy (abnormality of tone with motor dysfunction), blindness (for example, corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60 in the better eye) or deafness (for example, hearing loss requiring amplification or worse)). For the women, the primary outcome will be maternal sepsis (defined as chorioamnionitis; pyrexia after trial entry requiring the use of antibiotics; puerperal sepsis; intrapartum fever requiring the use of antibiotics; or postnatal pyrexia).

          Discussion

          Data analyses are expected to commence in 2011 with results publicly available in 2012.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation.

            Large pragmatic trials provide the most reliable data about the effects of treatments, but should be designed, analysed, and reported to enable the most effective use of treatments in routine practice. Subgroup analyses are important if there are potentially large differences between groups in the risk of a poor outcome with or without treatment, if there is potential heterogeneity of treatment effect in relation to pathophysiology, if there are practical questions about when to treat, or if there are doubts about benefit in specific groups, such as elderly people, which are leading to potentially inappropriate undertreatment. Analyses must be predefined, carefully justified, and limited to a few clinically important questions, and post-hoc observations should be treated with scepticism irrespective of their statistical significance. If important subgroup effects are anticipated, trials should either be powered to detect them reliably or pooled analyses of several trials should be undertaken. Formal rules for the planning, analysis, and reporting of subgroup analyses are proposed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth.

              Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a serious complication of preterm birth and the primary cause of early neonatal mortality and disability. To assess the effects on fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, on maternal mortality and morbidity, and on the child in later life of administering corticosteroids to the mother before anticipated preterm birth. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (30 October 2005). Randomised controlled comparisons of antenatal corticosteroid administration (betamethasone, dexamethasone, or hydrocortisone) with placebo or with no treatment given to women with a singleton or multiple pregnancy, expected to deliver preterm as a result of either spontaneous preterm labour, preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes or elective preterm delivery. Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. Twenty-one studies (3885 women and 4269 infants) are included. Treatment with antenatal corticosteroids does not increase risk to the mother of death, chorioamnionitis or puerperal sepsis. Treatment with antenatal corticosteroids is associated with an overall reduction in neonatal death (relative risk (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.81, 18 studies, 3956 infants), RDS (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.73, 21 studies, 4038 infants), cerebroventricular haemorrhage (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69, 13 studies, 2872 infants), necrotising enterocolitis (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.74, eight studies, 1675 infants), respiratory support, intensive care admissions (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.99, two studies, 277 infants) and systemic infections in the first 48 hours of life (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.85, five studies, 1319 infants). Antenatal corticosteroid use is effective in women with premature rupture of membranes and pregnancy related hypertension syndromes. The evidence from this new review supports the continued use of a single course of antenatal corticosteroids to accelerate fetal lung maturation in women at risk of preterm birth. A single course of antenatal corticosteroids should be considered routine for preterm delivery with few exceptions. Further information is required concerning optimal dose to delivery interval, optimal corticosteroid to use, effects in multiple pregnancies, and to confirm the long-term effects into adulthood.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Syst Rev
                Syst Rev
                Systematic Reviews
                BioMed Central
                2046-4053
                2012
                12 February 2012
                : 1
                : 12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies (ARCH), Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
                [2 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
                [3 ]National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Paediatrics and Obstetrics/Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [5 ]National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [6 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                [7 ]Department of Neonatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
                [8 ]Pediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise, USA
                [9 ]Northwest Perinatal Centre, Portland, USA
                [10 ]Department of Paediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
                [11 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [12 ]Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
                [13 ]Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA
                [14 ]Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA
                [15 ]School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, USA
                [16 ]The Biostatistics Centre, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
                [17 ]Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [18 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, USA
                Article
                2046-4053-1-12
                10.1186/2046-4053-1-12
                3351733
                22588009
                6e9c8c45-a447-46bc-a802-7cd302557ef4
                Copyright ©2012 Crowther et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 December 2011
                : 12 February 2012
                Categories
                Protocol

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article