11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidental cardiovascular findings on chest CT scans requested for suspected COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Computed tomography scans of the chest are often requested as a complementary examination to investigate a clinical suspicion of pulmonary disease caused by the novel coronavirus 19 (COVID-19).

          Objectives

          Our objective was to analyze the prevalence of incidental cardiovascular findings on chest CT scans requested to assess radiological signs suggestive of COVID-19 infection.

          Methods

          This cross-sectional, descriptive, and retrospective study reviewed 1,444 chest tomographies conducted in the Radiology department of the Hospital de Clínicas Gaspar Vianna, from March 1 to July 30, 2020, describing the prevalence of images suggestive of viral pneumonia by COVID-19 and incidental pulmonary and cardiovascular findings.

          Results

          The mean age of the patients was 50.6 ± 16.4 years and female sex was more frequent. Computed tomography without contrast was the most frequently used method (97.2%). Aortic and coronary wall calcification and cardiomegaly were the most prevalent cardiovascular findings. CT angiography revealed aortic aneurysms (9.7%), aortic dissection (7.3%) and thoracic aortic ulcers (2.4%).

          Conclusions

          Incidental cardiovascular findings occurred in about half of the chest CT scans of patients with suspected COVID-19, especially aortic calcifications, cardiomegaly, and coronary calcification.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

          Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64–128·55; p=0·0033) on admission. Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0–24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors. The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days. Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study

            Abstract Objective To delineate the clinical characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) who died. Design Retrospective case series. Setting Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China. Participants Among a cohort of 799 patients, 113 who died and 161 who recovered with a diagnosis of covid-19 were analysed. Data were collected until 28 February 2020. Main outcome measures Clinical characteristics and laboratory findings were obtained from electronic medical records with data collection forms. Results The median age of deceased patients (68 years) was significantly older than recovered patients (51 years). Male sex was more predominant in deceased patients (83; 73%) than in recovered patients (88; 55%). Chronic hypertension and other cardiovascular comorbidities were more frequent among deceased patients (54 (48%) and 16 (14%)) than recovered patients (39 (24%) and 7 (4%)). Dyspnoea, chest tightness, and disorder of consciousness were more common in deceased patients (70 (62%), 55 (49%), and 25 (22%)) than in recovered patients (50 (31%), 48 (30%), and 1 (1%)). The median time from disease onset to death in deceased patients was 16 (interquartile range 12.0-20.0) days. Leukocytosis was present in 56 (50%) patients who died and 6 (4%) who recovered, and lymphopenia was present in 103 (91%) and 76 (47%) respectively. Concentrations of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, cardiac troponin I, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and D-dimer were markedly higher in deceased patients than in recovered patients. Common complications observed more frequently in deceased patients included acute respiratory distress syndrome (113; 100%), type I respiratory failure (18/35; 51%), sepsis (113; 100%), acute cardiac injury (72/94; 77%), heart failure (41/83; 49%), alkalosis (14/35; 40%), hyperkalaemia (42; 37%), acute kidney injury (28; 25%), and hypoxic encephalopathy (23; 20%). Patients with cardiovascular comorbidity were more likely to develop cardiac complications. Regardless of history of cardiovascular disease, acute cardiac injury and heart failure were more common in deceased patients. Conclusion Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection can cause both pulmonary and systemic inflammation, leading to multi-organ dysfunction in patients at high risk. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and respiratory failure, sepsis, acute cardiac injury, and heart failure were the most common critical complications during exacerbation of covid-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chest CT Findings in 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Infections from Wuhan, China: Key Points for the Radiologist

              A cluster of patients with an acute severe lower respiratory tract illness linked to a seafood and live animal market was reported by public health officials in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 (1). Shortly thereafter, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention commenced an investigation into the outbreak. A previously unknown coronavirus (2019 novel coronavirus [2019-nCoV]) was isolated from respiratory epithelial cells in these patients (2). Initially confined to Wuhan, the infection has spread elsewhere, with 9720 confirmed cases in China and 106 confirmed cases in other countries—including six in the United States as of January 31, 2020 (3,4). Seven coronaviruses are known to cause disease in humans (2,5,6). Two strains, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), have zoonotic origins and have been linked to outbreaks of severe respiratory illnesses in humans (6). Although 2019-nCoV, too, is believed to have a zoonotic origin, person-to-person transmission has been documented (7). Most patients with 2019-nCoV infection present with fever (98%), cough (76%), and myalgia or fatigue (44%). Dyspnea has been reported in 55% of patients, developing in a median of 8 days after onset of initial symptoms. Six of 41 patients (15%) in the largest published cohort to date (8) died from their illness, and there are now 80 confirmed deaths (4). Limited information exists regarding chest imaging findings of 2019-nCoV lung infection (Table). One initial report included chest radiographs of a single patient. A bedside chest radiograph obtained 8 days after symptom onset showed bilateral lung consolidation with relative peripheral sparing. A radiograph obtained 3 days later showed more extensive, basal predominant lung consolidation with possible small pleural effusions corresponding to clinical worsening (2). A second report showed CT images from a single patient who had peripheral, bilateral ground-glass opacity (9). A different report of six family members with 2019-nCoV lung infection mentions lung opacities present on chest CT scans but lacks details on pattern or distribution aside from ground-glass opacities in an asymptomatic 10-year-old boy (7). A recent cohort study of 41 patients with confirmed 2019-nCoV infection included limited analysis of chest imaging studies. All but one patient was reported to have bilateral lung involvement on chest radiographs (8). Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were more likely to have larger areas of bilateral consolidation on CT scans, whereas patients not requiring admission to the intensive care unit with milder illness were more likely to have ground-glass opacity and small areas of consolidation, the latter description suggesting an organizing pneumonia pattern of lung injury. A study of CT scans of 21 patients with 2019-nCoV infection (10) showed three (21%) with normal CT scans, 12 (57%) with ground-glass opacity only, and six (29%) with ground-glass opacity and consolidation at presentation. Fifteen patients (71%) had two or more lobes involved, and 16 (76%) had bilateral disease. Interestingly, three patients (14%) had normal scans at diagnosis. One of those patients still had a normal scan at short-term follow-up. Seven other patients underwent follow-up CT (range, 1–4 days; mean, 2.5 days); five (63%) had mild progression, and two (25%) had moderate progression. Reported Chest CT Findings in 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infections Overall, the imaging findings reported for 2019-nCoV are similar to those reported for SARS-CoV (11–13) and MERS-CoV (14,15), not surprising as the responsible viruses are also coronaviruses. Given that up to 30% of patients with 2019-nCoV infection develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (8), chest imaging studies showing extensive consolidation and ground-glass opacity, typical of acute lung injury, are not unexpected (16,17). The long-term imaging features of 2019-nCoV are not yet known but presumably will resemble those of other causes of acute lung injury. As the number of reported cases of 2019-nCoV infection continue to increase, radiologists may encounter patients with this infection. A high index of suspicion and detailed exposure and travel history are critical to considering this diagnosis. In the correct clinical setting, bilateral ground-glass opacities or consolidation at chest imaging should prompt the radiologist to suggest 2019-nCoV as a possible diagnosis. Furthermore, a normal chest CT scan does not exclude the diagnosis of 2019-nCoV infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Vasc Bras
                J Vasc Bras
                jvb
                Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
                Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
                1677-5449
                1677-7301
                07 January 2022
                2021
                : 20
                : e20210052
                Affiliations
                [1 ] originalCentro Universitário Metropolitano da Amazônia – UNIFAMAZ, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [2 ] originalHospital Santa Helena, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
                [3 ] originalHospital Metropolitano de Urgência e Emergência, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
                [4 ] originalHospital de Clínicas Gaspar Vianna – HCGV, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [5 ] originalUniversidade do Estado do Pará – UEPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [6 ] originalUniversidade Federal do Pará – UFPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [1 ] originalCentro Universitário Metropolitano da Amazônia – UNIFAMAZ, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [2 ] originalHospital Santa Helena, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
                [3 ] originalHospital Metropolitano de Urgência e Emergência, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
                [4 ] originalHospital de Clínicas Gaspar Vianna – HCGV, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [5 ] originalUniversidade do Estado do Pará – UEPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                [6 ] originalUniversidade Federal do Pará – UFPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
                Author notes

                Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article.

                Correspondence José Maciel Caldas dos Reis Centro Universitário Metropolitano da Amazônia – UNIFAMAZ Travessa Angustura, 2932 CEP 66093-040 - Belém (PA), Brasil Tel.: +55 (91) 4005-2551/+55 (91) 98151-4646 E-mail: macielreis.angiovasc@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information JMCR - Full member, Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV); MSc in Cirurgia e Pesquisa Experimental, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA); Professor of Habilidades Cirúrgicas, Centro Universitário Metropolitano da Amazônia (UNIFAMAZ). GSM - Full member of SBACV; Board certified in Cirurgia Vascular, Hospital Santa Helena. MVO - Full member of SBACV; Board certified in Cirurgia Vascular from Hospital Beneficente Portuguesa de São Paulo; Vascular Coordinator, Hospital Metropolitano de Urgência e Emergência. MMF - Graduate, Programa de Residência em Cirurgia Geral, Hospital de Clínicas Gaspar Vianna (HCGV). TMMFS and HLSF - Medical students, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA). MCA - Professor of Bioestatística, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA).

                Author contributions Conception and design: JMCR, MMF, TMMFS Analysis and interpretation: JMCR, MMF, TMMFS, MCA Data collection: MMF, HLSF, TMMFS Writing the article: JMCR, MMF, TMMFS Critical revision of the article: JMCR, GSM, VMO, MCA Final approval of the article*: JMCR, GSM, VMO, MMF, TMMFS, HLSF, MCA Statistical analysis: MCA Overall responsibility: JMCR *All authors have read and approved of the final version of the article submitted to J Vasc Bras.

                Conflito de interesse: Os autores declararam não haver conflitos de interesse que precisam ser informados.

                Correspondência José Maciel Caldas dos Reis Centro Universitário Metropolitano da Amazônia – UNIFAMAZ Travessa Angustura, 2932 CEP 66093-040 - Belém (PA), Brasil Tel.: (91) 4005-2551/(91) 98151-4646 E-mail: macielreis.angiovasc@ 123456gmail.com

                Informações sobre os autores JMCR - Membro Titular, SBACV; Mestre em Cirurgia e Pesquisa Experimental, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA); Professor de Habilidades Cirúrgicas, Centro Universitário Metropolitano da Amazônia (UNIFAMAZ). GSM - Membro Efetivo, SBACV; Especialista em Cirurgia Vascular, Hospital Santa Helena. MVO - Membro Efetivo, SBACV; Especialista em Cirurgia Vascular, Hospital Beneficente Portuguesa de São Paulo; Coordenador; Cirurgia Vascular; Hospital Metropolitano de Urgência e Emergência. MMF - Concluinte, Programa de Residência em Cirurgia Geral, Hospital de Clínicas Gaspar Vianna (HCGV). TMMFS e HLSF - Graduandos em Medicina, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA). MCA - Professora de Bioestatística, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA).

                Contribuições dos autores Concepção e desenho do estudo: JMCR, MMF, TMMFS Análise e interpretação dos dados: JMCR, MMF, TMMFS, MCA Coleta de dados: MMF, HLSF, TMMFS Redação do artigo: JMCR, MMF, TMMFS Revisão crítica do texto: JMCR, GSM, VMO, MCA Aprovação final do artigo*: JMCR, GSM, VMO, MMF, TMMFS, HLSF, MCA Análise estatística: MCA Responsabilidade geral pelo estudo: JMCR *Todos os autores leram e aprovaram a versão final submetida do J Vasc Bras.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-6970
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0940-7646
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-8267
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-4747
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-1655
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-3384
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-5972
                Article
                jvbAO20210052_PT 00332
                10.1590/1677-5449.210052
                8759582
                6ee166de-1b75-4ec1-bf31-d1405d96e6c8
                Copyright© 2021 The authors.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 April 2021
                : 07 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 12, Equations: 0, References: 22
                Categories
                Original Article

                incidental finding,cardiovascular finding,tomography,covid-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article