5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before December 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 2.2 Impact Factor I 5.8 CiteScore I 0.782 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Development of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Citrate Accumulation in Liver Transplant Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Patients with impaired citrate metabolism may experience citrate accumulation (CA), which causes life-threatening metabolic acidosis and hypocalcemia. CA poses a challenge for clinicians when deciding on the use of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for patients with liver dysfunction. This study aimed to develop a prediction model integrating multiple clinical variables to assess the risk of CA in liver transplant patients. Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study included postoperative liver transplant patients who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with RCA. The study end point was CA. A prediction model was developed using a generalized linear mixed-effect model based on the Akaike information criterion. The predictive values were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve and bootstrap resampling (times = 500) to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). A nomogram was used to visualize the model. Results: This study included 32 patients who underwent 133 CRRT sessions with RCA. CA occurred in 46 CRRT sessions. The model included lactate, norepinephrine >0.1 μg/kg/min, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and standard bicarbonate, which were tested before starting each CRRT session and body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease as predictors. The AUC of the model was 0.867 (95% CI 0.786–0.921), which was significantly higher than that of the single predictor ( p < 0.05). A nomogram visualized the prediction model. Conclusions: The prediction model integrating multiple clinical variables showed a good predictive value for CA. A nomogram visualized the model for easy application in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials

          The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or SOFA score was developed to assess the acute morbidity of critical illness at a population level and has been widely validated as a tool for this purpose across a range of healthcare settings and environments. In recent years, the SOFA score has become extensively used in a range of other applications. A change in the SOFA score of 2 or more is now a defining characteristic of the sepsis syndrome, and the European Medicines Agency has accepted that a change in the SOFA score is an acceptable surrogate marker of efficacy in exploratory trials of novel therapeutic agents in sepsis. The requirement to detect modest serial changes in a patients’ SOFA score therefore means that increased clarity on how the score should be assessed in different circumstances is required. This review explores the development of the SOFA score, its applications and the challenges associated with measurement. In addition, it proposes guidance designed to facilitate the consistent and valid assessment of the score in multicentre sepsis trials involving novel therapeutic agents or interventions. Conclusion The SOFA score is an increasingly important tool in defining both the clinical condition of the individual patient and the response to therapies in the context of clinical trials. Standardisation between different assessors in widespread centres is key to detecting response to treatment if the SOFA score is to be used as an outcome in sepsis clinical trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            KDIGO Clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury

            (2024)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: an updated meta-analysis of RCTs

              M Bai, M Zhou, L HE (2024)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2022
                February 2022
                05 May 2021
                : 51
                : 2
                : 111-121
                Affiliations
                [_a] aSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
                [_b] bDepartment of Health Science, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, USA
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6774-9241
                Article
                513947 Blood Purif 2022;51:111–121
                10.1159/000513947
                33951630
                6f0de83b-3f95-41f4-bee1-80f1f0e49c9a
                © 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 19 June 2020
                : 16 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Research Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Liver transplantation,Prediction model,Citrate accumulation,Regional citrate anticoagulation,Continuous renal replacement therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article