14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS): dissemination and implementation research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS) was designed to characterise the availability, placement, promotion and price of tobacco products, with items chosen for relevance to regulating the retail tobacco environment. This study describes the process to develop the STARS instrument and protocol employed by a collaboration of US government agencies, US state tobacco control programmes (TCPs), advocacy organisations, public health attorneys and researchers from the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control (SCTC) Research Initiative.

          Methods

          To evaluate dissemination and early implementation experiences, we conducted telephone surveys with state TCP leaders (n=50, response rate=100%), and with individuals recruited via a STARS download registry on the SCTC website. Website registrants were surveyed within 6 months of the STARS release (n=105, response rate=66%) and again after ∼5 months (retention rate=62%).

          Results

          Among the state TCPs, 42 reported conducting any retail marketing surveillance, with actual or planned STARS use in 34 of these states and in 12 of the 17 states where marketing surveillance was not previously reported. Within 6 months of the STARS release, 21% of surveyed registrants reported using STARS and 35% were likely/very likely to use it in the next 6 months. To investigate implementation fidelity, we compared data collected by self-trained volunteers and by trained professionals, the latter method being more typically in retail marketing surveillance studies. Results suggest high or moderate reliability for most STARS measures.

          Conclusion

          The study concludes with examples of states that used STARS to inform policy change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effect of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation.

          We examined the influence of tobacco outlet density and residential proximity to tobacco outlets on continuous smoking abstinence 6 months after a quit attempt. We used continuation ratio logit models to examine the relationships of tobacco outlet density and tobacco outlet proximity with biochemically verified continuous abstinence across weeks 1, 2, 4, and 26 after quitting among 414 adult smokers from Houston, Texas (33% non-Latino White, 34% non-Latino Black, and 33% Latino). Analyses controlled for age, race/ethnicity, partner status, education, gender, employment status, prequit smoking rate, and the number of years smoked. Residential proximity to tobacco outlets, but not tobacco outlet density, provided unique information in the prediction of long-term, continuous abstinence from smoking during a specific quit attempt. Participants residing less than 250 meters (P = .01) or less than 500 meters (P = .04) from the closest tobacco outlet were less likely to be abstinent than were those living 250 meters or farther or 500 meters or farther, respectively, from outlets. Because residential proximity to tobacco outlets influences smoking cessation, zoning restrictions to limit tobacco sales in residential areas may complement existing efforts to reduce tobacco use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A longitudinal study of exposure to retail cigarette advertising and smoking initiation.

            Accumulating evidence suggests that widespread advertising for cigarettes at the point of sale encourages adolescents to smoke; however, no longitudinal study of exposure to retail tobacco advertising and smoking behavior has been reported. A school-based survey included 1681 adolescents (aged 11-14 years) who had never smoked. One measure of exposure assessed the frequency of visiting types of stores that contain the most cigarette advertising. A more detailed measure combined data about visiting stores near school with observations of cigarette advertisements and pack displays in those stores. Follow-up surveys 12 and 30 months after baseline (retention rate: 81%) documented the transition from never to ever smoking, even just a puff. After 12 months, 18% of adolescents initiated smoking, but the incidence was 29% among students who visited convenience, liquor, or small grocery stores at least twice per week and 9% among those who reported the lowest visit frequency (less than twice per month). Adjusting for multiple risk factors, the odds of initiation remained significantly higher (odds ratio: 1.64 [95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.55]) for adolescents who reported moderate visit frequency (0.5-1.9 visits per week), and the odds of initiation more than doubled for those who visited > or = 2 times per week (odds ratio: 2.58 [95% confidence interval: 1.68-3.97]). Similar associations were observed for the more detailed exposure measure and persisted at 30 months. Exposure to retail cigarette advertising is a risk factor for smoking initiation. Policies and parenting practices that limit adolescents' exposure to retail cigarette advertising could improve smoking prevention efforts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tobacco industry consumer research on smokeless tobacco users and product development.

              Since 2006, RJ Reynolds (RJR) and Philip Morris have both introduced new smokeless "snus" tobacco products. We analyzed previously secret tobacco industry documents describing the history of RJR and Philip Morris's consumer research, smokeless product development, and marketing strategies. We found that RJR had invested in smokeless research, development, and marketing since 1968. RJR first targeted low-income males through sampling and sponsorship at fishing, rodeo, and baseball events, and through advertising portraying the user as "hard working." In the early 1990s, Philip Morris and RJR hoped to attract more urban, female smokeless users. The current "snus" campaigns appear to appeal to these targeted consumers and smokers in smoke-free environments. These efforts may expand the tobacco market and undermine smoking cessation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tob Control
                Tob Control
                tobaccocontrol
                tc
                Tobacco Control
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0964-4563
                1468-3318
                October 2016
                : 25
                : Suppl 1 , Advancing the Science of State and Community Tobacco Control
                : i67-i74
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA
                [2 ]Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [3 ]RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                [4 ]Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. , Louis, Missouri, USA
                [5 ]Barker Bi-Coastal Health Consultants , Calabasas, California, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Lisa Henriksen, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5705, USA; lhenriksen@ 123456stanford.edu
                Article
                tobaccocontrol-2016-053076
                10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053076
                5099212
                27697950
                6fa61fa4-dae0-4724-9c4e-9efb38a70af3
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 28 May 2016
                : 27 June 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054;
                Award ID: U01-CA154241
                Award ID: U01-CA154281
                Award ID: U01-CA154248
                Categories
                1506
                Research Paper
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Public health
                advertising and promotion,price,public policy,surveillance and monitoring,environment

                Comments

                Comment on this article